Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4 |
|
#
1106bc20 |
| 12-May-2022 |
Fraser Cormack <fraser@codeplay.com> |
[CodeGen][NFC] Move some comments from the end of lines to above them
This avoids wrapping the line itself awkwardly when it exceeds 80 chars. It also better matches our style most other places.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3 |
|
#
8f2ec974 |
| 27-Apr-2022 |
Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com> |
[X86] Move target-generic code into CodeGen [NFC]
This code is the same for all platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124566
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.2 |
|
#
61e36e87 |
| 19-Apr-2022 |
Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com> |
[safestack] Support safestack in stack size diagnostics
Current stack size diagnostics ignore the size of the unsafe stack. This patch attaches the size of the static portion of the unsafe stack to
[safestack] Support safestack in stack size diagnostics
Current stack size diagnostics ignore the size of the unsafe stack. This patch attaches the size of the static portion of the unsafe stack to the function as metadata, which can be used by the backend to emit diagnostics regarding stack usage.
Reviewed By: phosek, mcgrathr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119996
show more ...
|
#
d7938b1a |
| 17-Apr-2022 |
Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> |
MachineModuleInfo: Move HasSplitStack handling to AsmPrinter
This is used to emit one field in doFinalization for the module. We can accumulate this when emitting all individual functions directly i
MachineModuleInfo: Move HasSplitStack handling to AsmPrinter
This is used to emit one field in doFinalization for the module. We can accumulate this when emitting all individual functions directly in the AsmPrinter, rather than accumulating additional state in MachineModuleInfo.
Move the special case behavior predicate into MachineFrameInfo to share it. This now promotes it to generic behavior. I'm assuming this is fine because no other target implements adjustForSegmentedStacks, or has tests using the split-stack attribute.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
#
989f1c72 |
| 15-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-in
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
a278250b |
| 10-Mar-2022 |
Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org> |
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https:/
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
show more ...
|
#
7f230fee |
| 07-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init |
|
#
d636b76e |
| 22-Jan-2022 |
Daniel McIntosh <Daniel.McIntosh@ibm.com> |
[CodeGen] Use AdjustStackOffset for Callee Saved Registers in PEI::calculateFrameObjectOffsets
Also, changes how the CSR loop is indexed, which should avoid bugs like the one fixed by rG4a57bb5a3b74
[CodeGen] Use AdjustStackOffset for Callee Saved Registers in PEI::calculateFrameObjectOffsets
Also, changes how the CSR loop is indexed, which should avoid bugs like the one fixed by rG4a57bb5a3b74bdad9b0518009a7d7ac7ca2ac650
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120668
show more ...
|
#
deaf22bc |
| 09-Feb-2022 |
Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com> |
[X86] Implement -fzero-call-used-regs option
The "-fzero-call-used-regs" option tells the compiler to zero out certain registers before the function returns. It's also available as a function attrib
[X86] Implement -fzero-call-used-regs option
The "-fzero-call-used-regs" option tells the compiler to zero out certain registers before the function returns. It's also available as a function attribute: zero_call_used_regs.
The two upper categories are:
- "used": Zero out used registers. - "all": Zero out all registers, whether used or not.
The individual options are:
- "skip": Don't zero out any registers. This is the default. - "used": Zero out all used registers. - "used-arg": Zero out used registers that are used for arguments. - "used-gpr": Zero out used registers that are GPRs. - "used-gpr-arg": Zero out used GPRs that are used as arguments. - "all": Zero out all registers. - "all-arg": Zero out all registers used for arguments. - "all-gpr": Zero out all GPRs. - "all-gpr-arg": Zero out all GPRs used for arguments.
This is used to help mitigate Return-Oriented Programming exploits.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110869
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
dc9f65be |
| 14-Dec-2021 |
John Brawn <john.brawn@arm.com> |
[AArch64][SVE] Fix handling of stack protection with SVE
Fix a couple of things that were causing stack protection to not work correctly in functions that have scalable vectors on the stack: * Use
[AArch64][SVE] Fix handling of stack protection with SVE
Fix a couple of things that were causing stack protection to not work correctly in functions that have scalable vectors on the stack: * Use TypeSize when determining if accesses to a variable are considered out-of-bounds so that the behaviour is correct for scalable vectors. * When stack protection is enabled move the stack protector location to the top of the SVE locals, so that any overflow in them (or the other locals which are below that) will be detected.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111631
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
273a0c8b |
| 04-Nov-2021 |
Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> |
PrologEpilogInserter: Use explicit control for scavenge slot placement
AMDGPU is unusual in that the both stack is indexed in the same direction as stack growth (up). We therefore always need the em
PrologEpilogInserter: Use explicit control for scavenge slot placement
AMDGPU is unusual in that the both stack is indexed in the same direction as stack growth (up). We therefore always need the emergency stack slots placed as low as possible to ensure they are in range of load/store instruction immediate offsets. The existing logic is mostly OK, but failed if we required stack realignment.
I don't understand what the existing control isFPCloseToIncomingSP is supposed to mean, but can only be used to stop placing the scavenge slots earlier. Make this explicit so that targets can opt-in rather than opt-out only.
show more ...
|
#
fc981ced |
| 21-Nov-2021 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC)
|
#
bd4dad87 |
| 07-Oct-2021 |
Jack Andersen <jackoalan@gmail.com> |
[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand
Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are invariably treated as RegState::
[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand
Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are invariably treated as RegState::Debug operands. This change enforces this invariant as part of MachineInstr::addOperand so that all passes emit this flag consistently.
RegState::Debug is inconsistently set on DBG_VALUE registers throughout LLVM. This runs the risk of a filtering iterator like MachineRegisterInfo::reg_nodbg_iterator to process these operands erroneously when not parsed from MIR sources.
This issue was observed in the development of the llvm-mos fork which adds a backend that relies on physical register operands much more than existing targets. Physical RegUnit 0 has the same numeric encoding as $noreg (indicating an undef for DBG_VALUE). Allowing debug operands into the machine scheduler correlates $noreg with RegUnit 0 (i.e. a collision of register numbers with different zero semantics). Eventually, this causes an assert where DBG_VALUE instructions are prohibited from participating in live register ranges.
Reviewed By: MatzeB, StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110105
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
e4223438 |
| 21-Sep-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
Make DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit's limit param required
And always print it.
This makes some LLVM diagnostics match up better with Clang's diagnostics.
Updated some AMDGPU uses of DiagnosticInfoRe
Make DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit's limit param required
And always print it.
This makes some LLVM diagnostics match up better with Clang's diagnostics.
Updated some AMDGPU uses of DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit and now we print better diagnostics for those.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110204
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
95ef464a |
| 29-Jul-2021 |
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com> |
Handle subregs and superregs in callee-saved register mask
If a target lists both a subreg and a superreg in a callee-saved register mask, the prolog will spill both aliasing registers. Instead, don
Handle subregs and superregs in callee-saved register mask
If a target lists both a subreg and a superreg in a callee-saved register mask, the prolog will spill both aliasing registers. Instead, don't spill the subreg if a superreg is being spilled. This case is hit by the PowerPC SPE code, as well as a modified RISC-V backend for CHERI I maintain out of tree.
Reviewed By: jhibbits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73170
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3 |
|
#
f53d7915 |
| 22-Jun-2021 |
Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> |
Improve the diagnostic of DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit (and warn-stack-size in particular)
Before: `warning: stack size limit exceeded (888) in main` After: `warning: stack frame size (888) exceeds l
Improve the diagnostic of DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit (and warn-stack-size in particular)
Before: `warning: stack size limit exceeded (888) in main` After: `warning: stack frame size (888) exceeds limit (100) in function 'main'` (the -Wframe-larger-than limit will be mentioned)
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104667
show more ...
|
#
8ace1213 |
| 21-Jun-2021 |
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> |
[IR] convert warn-stack-size from module flag to fn attr
Otherwise, this causes issues when building with LTO for object files that use different values.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/li
[IR] convert warn-stack-size from module flag to fn attr
Otherwise, this causes issues when building with LTO for object files that use different values.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1395
Reviewed By: dblaikie, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104342
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
fc018ebb |
| 10-Jun-2021 |
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> |
[IR] make -warn-frame-size into a module attr
-Wframe-larger-than= is an interesting warning; we can't know the frame size until PrologueEpilogueInsertion (PEI); very late in the compilation pipelin
[IR] make -warn-frame-size into a module attr
-Wframe-larger-than= is an interesting warning; we can't know the frame size until PrologueEpilogueInsertion (PEI); very late in the compilation pipeline.
-Wframe-larger-than= was propagated through CC1 as an -mllvm flag, then was a cl::opt in LLVM's PEI pass; this meant it was dropped during LTO and needed to be re-specified via -plugin-opt.
Instead, make it part of the IR proper as a module level attribute, similar to D103048. Introduce -fwarn-stack-size CC1 option.
Reviewed By: rsmith, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103928
show more ...
|
#
8496fc2e |
| 26-May-2021 |
Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com> |
[DebugInstrRef][1/3] Track PHI values through register allocation
This patch introduces "DBG_PHI" instructions, a marker of where a PHI instruction used to be, before PHI elimination. Under the inst
[DebugInstrRef][1/3] Track PHI values through register allocation
This patch introduces "DBG_PHI" instructions, a marker of where a PHI instruction used to be, before PHI elimination. Under the instruction referencing model, we want to know where every value in the function is defined -- and a PHI, even if implicit, is such a place.
Just like instruction numbers, we can use this to identify a value to be used as a variable value, but we don't need to know what instruction defines that value, for example:
bb1: DBG_PHI $rax, 1 [... more insts ... ] bb2: DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 0, !1234, !DIExpression()
This specifies that on entry to bb1, whatever value is in $rax is known as value number one -- and the later DBG_INSTR_REF marks the position where variable !1234 should take on value number one.
PHI locations are stored in MachineFunction for the duration of the regalloc phase in the DebugPHIPositions map. The map is populated by PHIElimination, and then flushed back into the instruction stream by virtregrewriter. A small amount of maintenence is needed in LiveDebugVariables to account for registers being split, but only for individual positions, not for entire ranges of blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86812
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2 |
|
#
ea0eec69 |
| 20-Jan-2021 |
Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com> |
IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory,
IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001 in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three values there:
* 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR] * 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR] * 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.
All other values are currently reserved.
If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.
There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr if necessary).
show more ...
|
#
6248d111 |
| 07-May-2021 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
Retire TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillAlignment
getSpillAlign does the same thing.
|
#
a9968c0a |
| 15-Mar-2021 |
Tomas Matheson <tomas.matheson@arm.com> |
[NFC][CodeGen] Tidy up TargetRegisterInfo stack realignment functions
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false. This means that the behavior of needsStackRealig
[NFC][CodeGen] Tidy up TargetRegisterInfo stack realignment functions
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false. This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore, needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
show more ...
|
#
489ca73a |
| 29-Mar-2021 |
Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es> |
[PrologEpilogInserter][AMDGPU] Only adjust offset for emergency spill slots if the stack grows down
D89239 adjusts the stack offset of emergency spill slots for overaligned stacks. However the adjus
[PrologEpilogInserter][AMDGPU] Only adjust offset for emergency spill slots if the stack grows down
D89239 adjusts the stack offset of emergency spill slots for overaligned stacks. However the adjustment is not valid for targets whose stack grows up (such as AMDGPU).
This change makes the adjustment conditional only to those targets whose stack grows down.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99504
show more ...
|
#
1db137b1 |
| 10-Mar-2021 |
Stephen Tozer <Stephen.Tozer@Sony.com> |
[DebugInfo] Handle DBG_VALUES with multiple variable location operands in MIR
This patch adds handling for DBG_VALUE_LIST in the MIR-passes (after finalize-isel), excluding the debug liveness passes
[DebugInfo] Handle DBG_VALUES with multiple variable location operands in MIR
This patch adds handling for DBG_VALUE_LIST in the MIR-passes (after finalize-isel), excluding the debug liveness passes and DWARF emission. This most significantly affects MachineSink, which now needs to consider all used registers of a debug value when sinking, but for most passes this change is simply replacing getDebugOperand(0) with an iteration over all debug operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92578
show more ...
|
#
f6774130 |
| 04-Mar-2021 |
Stephen Tozer <Stephen.Tozer@Sony.com> |
Reapply "[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values"
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc
Reapply "[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values"
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.
This reverts commit d2000b45d033c06dc7973f59909a0ad12887ff51.
show more ...
|