xref: /llvm-project/llvm/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.rst (revision f623dc9a8c37c3f2ed0a2138563a8b9e37adc1ce)
1================================
2Source Level Debugging with LLVM
3================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7
8Introduction
9============
10
11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug
12information in LLVM.  It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug
13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating
14front-ends or dealing directly with the information.  Further, this document
15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like.
16
17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information
18--------------------------------------------
19
20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important
21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code.
22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here.  The
23important ones are:
24
25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the
26  compiler.  No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to
27  be modified because of debugging information.
28
29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described
30  ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information.
31
32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages,
33  LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of
34  the source-level-language.
35
36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another.
37  LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language,
38  and the debugging information should work with any language.
39
40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler
41  to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging
42  formats.  This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level
43  debuggers, like GDB or DBX.
44
45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of
46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping
47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects.  The description of
48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an
49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end
50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard
51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_).
52
53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns
54the stored debug information into source-language specific information.  As
55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a
56specific language or family of languages.
57
58Debug information consumers
59---------------------------
60
61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped
62away during the compilation process.  This meta information provides an LLVM
63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source
64code.
65
66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and
67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and
68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView,
69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such
70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived
71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target
72debug info formats such as STABS.
73
74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools
75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original
76source from generated code.
77
78.. _intro_debugopt:
79
80Debug information and optimizations
81-----------------------------------
82
83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact
84well with optimizations and analysis.  In particular, the LLVM debug
85information provides the following guarantees:
86
87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read
88  the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM
89  optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug
90  info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid
91  breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as
92  possible.  Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the
93  current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program
94  variables, or calling functions that have been deleted.
95
96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging
97  information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they
98  perform aggressive optimizations.  This means that, with effort, the LLVM
99  optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code.
100
101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from
102  happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup,
103  tail duplication, etc).
104
105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of
106  the program, using existing facilities.  For example, duplicate
107  information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information
108  is automatically removed.
109
110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with
111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify
112the program as it executes from a debugger.  Compiling a program with
113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and
114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call
115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program
116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away
117completely.
118
119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to
120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information.  It can be run like
121this:
122
123.. code-block:: bash
124
125  % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks  # or some other level
126  % make TEST=dbgopt
127
128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes.  If
129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported
130as a failure.  See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test
131infrastructure and how to run various tests.
132
133.. _format:
134
135Debugging information format
136============================
137
138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for
139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without
140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information.  In
141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from
142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes
143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function.
144
145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types,
146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end
147in the form of LLVM metadata.
148
149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and
150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc).  It uses a generic
151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions,
152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and
153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target
154debugger to interpret the information.
155
156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some
157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps
158these to a minimum.  The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes
159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects
160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_.  These abstract objects are used by a
161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc.
162
163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects
164common to any source-language.  :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout
165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends.
166
167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes
168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``.
169
170.. _format_common_intrinsics:
171
172Debugger intrinsic functions
173----------------------------
174
175LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to
176track source local variables through optimization and code generation.
177
178``llvm.dbg.addr``
179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
180
181.. code-block:: llvm
182
183  void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata)
184
185This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable).
186The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a
187static alloca in the function entry block.  The second argument is a
188`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of
189the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
190<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.  An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the
191*address* of a source variable.
192
193.. code-block:: text
194
195    %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4
196    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1,
197                             metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2
198    !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
199    !2 = !DILocation(...)
200    ...
201    %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8
202    ; The address of i is buffer+64.
203    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3,
204                             metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4
205    !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
206    !4 = !DILocation(...)
207
208A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point
209of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the
210variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly
211multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively
212partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value``
213and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available.
214After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing
215the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same
216concrete source variable must agree on the memory location.
217
218
219``llvm.dbg.declare``
220^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
221
222.. code-block:: llvm
223
224  void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata)
225
226This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be
227one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable
228<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if
229a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that
230address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire
231lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info
232in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it,
233and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases.
234
235
236``llvm.dbg.value``
237^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
238
239.. code-block:: llvm
240
241  void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata)
242
243This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new
244value.  The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata).  The second
245argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a
246description of the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
247<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.
248
249An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable
250directly, not its address.  Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may
251be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting
252the complex expression derives the direct value.
253
254Object lifetimes and scoping
255============================
256
257In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or
258scopes limited to a subset of a function.  In the C family of languages, for
259example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source
260block that they are defined in.  In functional languages, values are only
261readable after they have been defined.  Though this is a very obvious concept,
262it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this
263sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules.
264
265In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to
266llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information.  Consider the
267following C fragment, for example:
268
269.. code-block:: c
270
271  1.  void foo() {
272  2.    int X = 21;
273  3.    int Y = 22;
274  4.    {
275  5.      int Z = 23;
276  6.      Z = X;
277  7.    }
278  8.    X = Y;
279  9.  }
280
281.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the
282   default in clang.
283
284Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this:
285
286.. code-block:: text
287
288  ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
289  define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 {
290  entry:
291    %X = alloca i32, align 4
292    %Y = alloca i32, align 4
293    %Z = alloca i32, align 4
294    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14
295    store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !14
296    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !15, metadata !13), !dbg !16
297    store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !16
298    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19
299    store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !19
300    %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20
301    store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21
302    %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22
303    store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23
304    ret void, !dbg !24
305  }
306
307  ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
308  declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
309
310  attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
311  attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
312
313  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
314  !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9}
315  !llvm.ident = !{!10}
316
317  !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2)
318  !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
319  !2 = !{}
320  !3 = !{!4}
321  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
322  !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6)
323  !6 = !{null}
324  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2}
325  !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
326  !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
327  !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"}
328  !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12)
329  !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
330  !13 = !DIExpression()
331  !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
332  !15 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12)
333  !16 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4)
334  !17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12)
335  !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
336  !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18)
337  !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !18)
338  !21 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !18)
339  !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4)
340  !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4)
341  !24 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4)
342
343
344This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging
345information.  In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and
346location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied
347together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements,
348variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function.
349
350.. code-block:: llvm
351
352  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14
353    ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X]
354
355The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the
356variable ``X``.  The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides
357scope information for the variable ``X``.
358
359.. code-block:: text
360
361  !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
362  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
363                              isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
364                              isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
365
366Here ``!14`` is metadata providing `location information
367<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_.  In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a
368`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_.  This way the location
369information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is
370declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``.
371
372Now lets take another example.
373
374.. code-block:: llvm
375
376  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19
377    ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z]
378
379The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for
380variable ``Z``.  The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides
381scope information for the variable ``Z``.
382
383.. code-block:: text
384
385  !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
386  !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18)
387
388Here ``!19`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column
389number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!18``.  The lexical scope itself resides
390inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above.
391
392The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward
393way to find instructions covered by a scope.
394
395Object lifetime in optimized code
396=================================
397
398In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a
399memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily
400optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can
401eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA
402values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an
403``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the
404variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic:
405
406* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceding dbg.values for (any
407  overlapping fragments of) the specified variable.
408* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream
409  the variable's value changes.
410* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a
411  constant value.
412
413Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization
414passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such
415changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any
416execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the
417developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed
418in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so
419risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist,
420damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their
421trust in the debugger.
422
423Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a
424redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value``
425with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations
426and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding
427these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the
428amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the
429remaining information.
430
431To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example:
432
433.. code-block:: llvm
434
435  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
436  entry:
437    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
438    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
439  truebr:
440    %tval = add i32 %bar, 1
441    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
442    %g1 = call i32 @gazonk()
443    br label %exit
444  falsebr:
445    %fval = add i32 %bar, 2
446    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
447    %g2 = call i32 @gazonk()
448    br label %exit
449  exit:
450    %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ]
451    %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ]
452    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2)
453    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
454    %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10
455    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
456    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
457    ret i32 %toret
458  }
459
460Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could,
461perhaps, be optimized into the following code:
462
463.. code-block:: llvm
464
465  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
466  entry:
467    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
468    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
469    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
470    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
471    ret i32 %toret
472  }
473
474What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable
475locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth
476dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands
477(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we
478might consider this placement of dbg.values:
479
480.. code-block:: llvm
481
482  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
483  entry:
484    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
485    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
486    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
487    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
488    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
489    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
490    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
491    ret i32 %toret
492  }
493
494However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at
495the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments
496that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate
497the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef
498dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``:
499
500.. code-block:: llvm
501
502  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
503  entry:
504    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
505    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
506    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2)
507    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
508    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
509    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
510    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
511    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
512    ret i32 %toret
513  }
514
515In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be
516recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable
517locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can
518observe re-ordering of assignments.
519
520How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen
521============================================================
522
523LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes,
524ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and
525instruction ranges. This
526is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping
527instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations
528however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic
529represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the
530variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program
531within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each
532variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions.
533From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable
534location fidelity are:
535
5361. Instruction Selection
5372. Register allocation
5383. Block layout
539
540each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can
541significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of
542different passes.
543
544Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations
545specified by ``llvm.dbg.declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire
546duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table.
547Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored:
548frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a
549disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to
550describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway.
551
552Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR
553---------------------------------------------------
554
555Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as
556it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must
557``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations.
558Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR
559there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR
560locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR
561instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as
562multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable
563locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into
564locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations,
565allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug
566metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection
567has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug
568metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the
569variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or
570otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes
571unavailable.
572
573Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out:
574in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR
575the equivalent location is used.
576
577After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions
578corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are
579inserted. There are two forms of this type of instruction.
580
581The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus:
582
583.. code-block:: text
584
585  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression()
586
587And has the following operands:
588 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register,
589   a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original
590   debug intrinsic referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable
591   location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand.
592 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is
593   directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The
594   ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the
595   latter.
596 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
597 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
598
599The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus:
600
601.. code-block:: text
602
603  DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2
604
605And has the following operands:
606 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
607 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
608 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable
609   location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first
610   operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location
611   operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated
612   by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression
613   <LangRef.html#diexpression>`.
614
615The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the
616positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block.  As
617with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable
618assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some
619instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below).
620Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if
621they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry.
622
623To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider
624the following example:
625
626.. code-block:: llvm
627
628  define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) {
629  entry:
630    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
631    br label %bb1, !dbg !5
632
633  bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb1, %entry
634    %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ]
635    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
636    %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5
637    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
638    %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5
639    %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5
640    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
641    %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5
642    %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5
643    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
644    %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2
645    %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5
646    br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5
647
648  bb2:                                              ; preds = %bb1
649    ret i32 0, !dbg !5
650  }
651
652If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced:
653
654.. code-block:: text
655
656  bb.0.entry:
657    successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
658    liveins: $rdi
659
660    %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi
661    %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
662    DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
663
664  bb.1.bb1:
665    successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000)
666
667    %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1
668    DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
669    DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5
670    %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
671    %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5
672    DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
673    %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5
674    DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
675    %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2)
676    %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5
677    JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5
678    JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5
679
680  bb.2.bb2:
681    %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
682    $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5
683    RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5
684
685Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value``
686intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing.
687Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded:
688
689* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value.
690* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register
691  ``%0``.
692* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction
693  (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding
694  the GEPs effect into the DIExpression.
695* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is
696  insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg``
697  DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location.
698* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``.
699
700Instruction Scheduling
701----------------------
702
703A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection
704and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can
705significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst
706case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such
707circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is
708better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state.
709Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any
710corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction
711is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration
712of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR:
713
714.. code-block:: text
715
716  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
717  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
718  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
719  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
720  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
721  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
722
723Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR:
724
725.. code-block:: text
726
727  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
728  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
729  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
730  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
731  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
732  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
733
734In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move
735the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order
736assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution
737above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because
738``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over
739misrepresenting the original program.
740
741In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following:
742
743.. code-block:: text
744
745  DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2
746  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
747  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
748  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
749  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
750  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
751  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
752
753Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1``
754disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the
755undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where
756an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur
757in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1``
758would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This
759accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding
760portion of the original program.
761
762Variable locations during Register Allocation
763---------------------------------------------
764
765To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the
766LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and
767deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy
768propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the
769VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original
770positions, translating virtual register references into their physical
771machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this
772pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by
773the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs
774because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by
775the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass.
776
777LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations
778-----------------------------------------------
779
780After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the
781LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims:
782
783* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills,
784* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block.
785
786After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than
787corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value,
788it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the
789block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is
790straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block
791requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which
792presents several difficulties:
793
794.. code-block:: text
795
796  define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 {
797  entry:
798    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
799
800  bb1:
801    %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ]
802    br label %exit, !dbg !26
803
804  truebr:
805    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
806    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
807    %value1 = add i32 %input, 1
808    br label %bb1
809
810  falsebr:
811    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
812    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
813    %value = add i32 %input, 2
814    br label %bb1
815
816  exit:
817    ret i32 %value, !dbg !30
818  }
819
820Here the difficulties are:
821
822* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order
823* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI
824  node
825
826As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an
827imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable
828location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way
829that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi
830nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for
831every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable
832location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being
833generated.
834
835Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both
836conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing
837constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would
838want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined
839as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without
840inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing
841codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values
842to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics.
843
844Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control
845flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks:
846when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all
847predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the
848predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined.
849
850Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable
851locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little
852effort is then required by supporting classes (such as
853DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every
854valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From
855the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location
856of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location
857of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block.
858
859.. _ccxx_frontend:
860
861C/C++ front-end specific debug information
862==========================================
863
864The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a
865format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_
866in terms of information content.  This allows code generators to
867trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf
868information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to
869translate it as needed.
870
871This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs.  Other
872languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to
873representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose
874to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model.
875As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM
876source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here.
877
878The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and
879the debug information that would best describe those constructs.  The
880canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in
881``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the
882helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``.
883
884C/C++ source file information
885-----------------------------
886
887``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an
888instruction.  One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using
889``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``.
890
891.. code-block:: c++
892
893  if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction
894    unsigned Line = Loc->getLine();
895    StringRef File = Loc->getFilename();
896    StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory();
897    bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode();
898  }
899
900When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been
901added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example
902
903.. code-block:: c++
904
905  if (MyBoolean) {
906    MyObject MO;
907    ...
908  }
909
910At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written
911explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when
912making code coverage.
913
914C/C++ global variable information
915---------------------------------
916
917Given an integer global variable declared as follows:
918
919.. code-block:: c
920
921  _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100;
922
923a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
924
925.. code-block:: text
926
927  ;;
928  ;; Define the global itself.
929  ;;
930  @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0
931
932  ;;
933  ;; List of debug info of globals
934  ;;
935  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
936
937  ;; Some unrelated metadata.
938  !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7}
939  !llvm.ident = !{!8}
940
941  ;; Define the global variable itself
942  !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64)
943
944  ;; Define the compile unit.
945  !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2,
946                               producer: "clang version 4.0.0",
947                               isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug,
948                               enums: !3, globals: !4)
949
950  ;;
951  ;; Define the file
952  ;;
953  !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin",
954               directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
955
956  ;; An empty array.
957  !3 = !{}
958
959  ;; The Array of Global Variables
960  !4 = !{!0}
961
962  ;;
963  ;; Define the type
964  ;;
965  !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
966
967  ;; Dwarf version to output.
968  !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
969
970  ;; Debug info schema version.
971  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
972
973  ;; Compiler identification
974  !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"}
975
976
977The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in
978case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler
979attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing)
980alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output
981for DW_AT_alignment value.
982
983C/C++ function information
984--------------------------
985
986Given a function declared as follows:
987
988.. code-block:: c
989
990  int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
991    return 0;
992  }
993
994a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
995
996.. code-block:: text
997
998  ;;
999  ;; Define the anchor for subprograms.
1000  ;;
1001  !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
1002                     isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
1003                     flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false,
1004                     retainedNodes: !2)
1005
1006  ;;
1007  ;; Define the subprogram itself.
1008  ;;
1009  define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 {
1010  ...
1011  }
1012
1013C++ specific debug information
1014==============================
1015
1016C++ special member functions information
1017----------------------------------------
1018
1019DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted.
1020
1021Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted:
1022
1023.. code-block:: c
1024
1025  class foo {
1026   public:
1027     foo(const foo&) = deleted;
1028  };
1029
1030A C++ frontend would generate following:
1031
1032.. code-block:: text
1033
1034  !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted)
1035
1036and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as:
1037
1038.. code-block:: text
1039
1040  DW_TAG_subprogram [7] *
1041    DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1]    (indexed (00000006) string = "foo")
1042    DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1]       (5)
1043    ...
1044    DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1045
1046Fortran specific debug information
1047==================================
1048
1049Fortran function information
1050----------------------------
1051
1052There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs.  LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE.  This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive.
1053
1054.. code-block:: fortran
1055
1056  elemental function elem_func(a)
1057
1058a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1059
1060.. code-block:: text
1061
1062  !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1,
1063          line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6,
1064          spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0,
1065          retainedNodes: !2)
1066
1067and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as:
1068
1069.. code-block:: text
1070
1071  DW_TAG_subprogram [3]
1072     DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr]     (0x0000000000000010 ".text")
1073     DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4]   (0x00000001)
1074     ...
1075     DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1076
1077There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType.
1078
1079.. code-block:: fortran
1080
1081  character(len=*), intent(in) :: string
1082
1083a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1084
1085.. code-block:: text
1086
1087  !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15)
1088  !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32)
1089
1090and this will materialize in DWARF tags as:
1091
1092.. code-block:: text
1093
1094   DW_TAG_string_type
1095                DW_AT_name      ("character(*)!2")
1096                DW_AT_string_length     (0x00000064)
1097   0x00000064:    DW_TAG_variable
1098                  DW_AT_location      (DW_OP_fbreg +16)
1099                  DW_AT_type  (0x00000083 "integer*8")
1100                  ...
1101                  DW_AT_artificial    (true)
1102
1103Debugging information format
1104============================
1105
1106Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties
1107----------------------------------------------------------
1108
1109Introduction
1110^^^^^^^^^^^^
1111
1112Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using
1113declared properties.  The language provides features to declare a property and
1114to let compiler synthesize accessor methods.
1115
1116The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance
1117variables and class variables.  However, the debugger does not know anything
1118about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces.  The debugger consumes
1119information generated by compiler in DWARF format.  The format does not support
1120encoding of Objective C properties.  This proposal describes DWARF extensions to
1121encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers
1122inspect Objective C properties.
1123
1124Proposal
1125^^^^^^^^
1126
1127Objective C properties exist separately from class members.  A property can be
1128defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each
1129access.  Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar.
1130Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler,
1131in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the
1132standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but
1133there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar.
1134
1135To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the
1136``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a
1137given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description.
1138The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property.
1139
1140If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed
1141in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG
1142for that property.  And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar
1143directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that
1144ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used
1145to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing
1146back to the property it is backing.
1147
1148The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion:
1149
1150.. code-block:: objc
1151
1152  @interface I1 {
1153    int n2;
1154  }
1155
1156  @property int p1;
1157  @property int p2;
1158  @end
1159
1160  @implementation I1
1161  @synthesize p1;
1162  @synthesize p2 = n2;
1163  @end
1164
1165This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output):
1166
1167.. code-block:: none
1168
1169  0x00000100:  TAG_structure_type [7] *
1170                 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1171                 AT_name( "I1" )
1172                 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1173                 AT_decl_line( 3 )
1174
1175  0x00000110    TAG_APPLE_property
1176                  AT_name ( "p1" )
1177                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1178
1179  0x00000120:   TAG_APPLE_property
1180                  AT_name ( "p2" )
1181                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1182
1183  0x00000130:   TAG_member [8]
1184                  AT_name( "_p1" )
1185                  AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" )
1186                  AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1187                  AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1188
1189  0x00000140:    TAG_member [8]
1190                   AT_name( "n2" )
1191                   AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" )
1192                   AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1193
1194  0x00000150:  AT_type( ( int ) )
1195
1196Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an
1197auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives
1198with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example.  But we actually
1199don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar
1200directly.
1201
1202Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in
1203the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in
1204the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation.  In that case,
1205the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the
1206current translation unit.
1207
1208Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using
1209``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``.
1210
1211.. code-block:: objc
1212
1213  @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr;
1214
1215.. code-block:: none
1216
1217  TAG_APPLE_property [8]
1218    AT_name( "pr" )
1219    AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) )
1220    AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic)
1221
1222The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using
1223``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes.
1224
1225.. code-block:: objc
1226
1227  @interface I1
1228  @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3;
1229  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a;
1230  @end
1231
1232  @implementation I1
1233  @synthesize p3;
1234  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ }
1235  @end
1236
1237The DWARF for this would be:
1238
1239.. code-block:: none
1240
1241  0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] *
1242                AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1243                AT_name( "I1" )
1244                AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1245                AT_decl_line( 3 )
1246
1247  0x000003cd      TAG_APPLE_property
1248                    AT_name ( "p3" )
1249                    AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" )
1250                    AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1251
1252  0x000003f3:     TAG_member [8]
1253                    AT_name( "_p3" )
1254                    AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1255                    AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} )
1256                    AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1257
1258New DWARF Tags
1259^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1260
1261+-----------------------+--------+
1262| TAG                   | Value  |
1263+=======================+========+
1264| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 |
1265+-----------------------+--------+
1266
1267New DWARF Attributes
1268^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1269
1270+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1271| Attribute                      | Value  | Classes   |
1272+================================+========+===========+
1273| DW_AT_APPLE_property           | 0x3fed | Reference |
1274+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1275| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter    | 0x3fe9 | String    |
1276+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1277| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter    | 0x3fea | String    |
1278+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1279| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant  |
1280+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1281
1282New DWARF Constants
1283^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1284
1285+--------------------------------------+-------+
1286| Name                                 | Value |
1287+======================================+=======+
1288| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly           | 0x01  |
1289+--------------------------------------+-------+
1290| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter             | 0x02  |
1291+--------------------------------------+-------+
1292| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign             | 0x04  |
1293+--------------------------------------+-------+
1294| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite          | 0x08  |
1295+--------------------------------------+-------+
1296| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain             | 0x10  |
1297+--------------------------------------+-------+
1298| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy               | 0x20  |
1299+--------------------------------------+-------+
1300| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic          | 0x40  |
1301+--------------------------------------+-------+
1302| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter             | 0x80  |
1303+--------------------------------------+-------+
1304| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic             | 0x100 |
1305+--------------------------------------+-------+
1306| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak               | 0x200 |
1307+--------------------------------------+-------+
1308| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong             | 0x400 |
1309+--------------------------------------+-------+
1310| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained  | 0x800 |
1311+--------------------------------------+-------+
1312| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability        | 0x1000|
1313+--------------------------------------+-------+
1314| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable    | 0x2000|
1315+--------------------------------------+-------+
1316| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class              | 0x4000|
1317+--------------------------------------+-------+
1318
1319Name Accelerator Tables
1320-----------------------
1321
1322Introduction
1323^^^^^^^^^^^^
1324
1325The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a
1326debugger needs.  The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries
1327in the table are publicly visible names only.  This means no static or hidden
1328functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``".  No static variables or private
1329class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``".  Many compilers add different
1330things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or
1331clang.
1332
1333The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of
1334these tables.  For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name
1335of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union,
1336the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name
1337given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information
1338entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member."
1339So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully
1340qualified name.  Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as
1341"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or
1342"``a::b::c``".  So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in
1343order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered
1344into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to
1345use.
1346
1347All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of
1348its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of
1349space in the object file.  These tables, when they are written to disk, are not
1350sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting.
1351These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table
1352itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially
1353for large C++ programs.
1354
1355Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this
1356table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we
1357won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables.
1358At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we
1359need.
1360
1361These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs.  LLDB
1362uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH.  LLDB is then
1363often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in
1364namespace "``baz``".  Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes
1365tables.  Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression,
1366we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot.  Having new
1367accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this
1368type of debugging experience greatly.
1369
1370We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory
1371from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing.  We would also
1372be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain
1373exactly what we need.  The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these
1374issues.  In order to solve these issues we need to:
1375
1376* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is
1377* Lookups should be very fast
1378* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers
1379* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box
1380* Strict rules for the contents of tables
1381
1382Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse
1383of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not
1384duplicated.  We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by
1385simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing.
1386
1387The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that
1388debuggers tend to do.  Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the
1389mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find
1390the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches.  In the
1391case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time.
1392
1393Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the
1394accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content.
1395
1396Hash Tables
1397^^^^^^^^^^^
1398
1399Standard Hash Tables
1400""""""""""""""""""""
1401
1402Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the
1403bucket contents:
1404
1405.. code-block:: none
1406
1407  .------------.
1408  |  HEADER    |
1409  |------------|
1410  |  BUCKETS   |
1411  |------------|
1412  |  DATA      |
1413  `------------'
1414
1415The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash:
1416
1417.. code-block:: none
1418
1419  .------------.
1420  | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0]
1421  | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1]
1422  | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2]
1423  | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3]
1424  |            | ...
1425  | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1426  '------------'
1427
1428So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table
14290x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket.  Each bucket must
1430contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data
1431for the current string value.
1432
1433.. code-block:: none
1434
1435              .------------.
1436  0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer
1437              | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash
1438              | "erase"    | string value
1439              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1440              |------------|
1441  0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer
1442              | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash
1443              | "dump"     | string value
1444              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1445              |------------|
1446  0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer
1447              | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash
1448              | "main"     | string value
1449              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1450              `------------'
1451
1452The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the
1453negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present.  So
1454if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit
1455hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``.  We would need to go to
1456the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches.  To
1457do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and
1458skip to the next bucket.  Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and
1459touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash.  All of
1460these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match.
1461
1462Name Hash Tables
1463""""""""""""""""
1464
1465To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit
1466differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values,
1467followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then
1468the data for all hash values:
1469
1470.. code-block:: none
1471
1472  .-------------.
1473  |  HEADER     |
1474  |-------------|
1475  |  BUCKETS    |
1476  |-------------|
1477  |  HASHES     |
1478  |-------------|
1479  |  OFFSETS    |
1480  |-------------|
1481  |  DATA       |
1482  `-------------'
1483
1484The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array.  By
1485making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow
1486ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as
1487possible.  Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup
1488goes.  If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions.  So for a
1489table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash
1490values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and
1491``OFFSETS`` as:
1492
1493.. code-block:: none
1494
1495  .-------------------------.
1496  |  HEADER.magic           | uint32_t
1497  |  HEADER.version         | uint16_t
1498  |  HEADER.hash_function   | uint16_t
1499  |  HEADER.bucket_count    | uint32_t
1500  |  HEADER.hashes_count    | uint32_t
1501  |  HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t
1502  |  HEADER_DATA            | HeaderData
1503  |-------------------------|
1504  |  BUCKETS                | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes
1505  |-------------------------|
1506  |  HASHES                 | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values
1507  |-------------------------|
1508  |  OFFSETS                | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data
1509  |-------------------------|
1510  |  ALL HASH DATA          |
1511  `-------------------------'
1512
1513So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up
1514with:
1515
1516.. code-block:: none
1517
1518              .------------.
1519              | HEADER     |
1520              |------------|
1521              |          0 | BUCKETS[0]
1522              |          2 | BUCKETS[1]
1523              |          5 | BUCKETS[2]
1524              |          6 | BUCKETS[3]
1525              |            | ...
1526              |        ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1527              |------------|
1528              | 0x........ | HASHES[0]
1529              | 0x........ | HASHES[1]
1530              | 0x........ | HASHES[2]
1531              | 0x........ | HASHES[3]
1532              | 0x........ | HASHES[4]
1533              | 0x........ | HASHES[5]
1534              | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1535              | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1536              | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1537              | 0x........ | HASHES[9]
1538              | 0x........ | HASHES[10]
1539              | 0x........ | HASHES[11]
1540              | 0x........ | HASHES[12]
1541              | 0x........ | HASHES[13]
1542              | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes]
1543              |------------|
1544              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0]
1545              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1]
1546              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2]
1547              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3]
1548              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4]
1549              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5]
1550              | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1551              | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1552              | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1553              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9]
1554              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10]
1555              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11]
1556              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12]
1557              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13]
1558              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes]
1559              |------------|
1560              |            |
1561              |            |
1562              |            |
1563              |            |
1564              |            |
1565              |------------|
1566  0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase")
1567              | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase"
1568              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1569              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1570              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1571              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1572              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1573              |------------|
1574  0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision")
1575              | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision"
1576              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1577              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1578              | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump")
1579              | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump"
1580              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1581              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1582              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1583              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1584              |------------|
1585  0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main")
1586              | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main"
1587              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1588              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1589              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1590              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1591              | 0x........ | HashData[4]
1592              | 0x........ | HashData[5]
1593              | 0x........ | HashData[6]
1594              | 0x........ | HashData[7]
1595              | 0x........ | HashData[8]
1596              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1597              `------------'
1598
1599So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for
1600debugger lookup.  If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we
1601would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit
1602hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``.  ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which
1603is the index into the ``HASHES`` table.  We would then compare any consecutive
160432 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in
1605``BUCKETS[3]``.  We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo
1606``n_buckets`` is still 3.  In the case of a failed lookup we would access the
1607memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes
1608before we know that we have no match.  We don't end up marching through
1609multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache
1610lines being accessed as small as possible.
1611
1612The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J.
1613Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections.  It is a
1614very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash
1615collisions.
1616
1617Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``.
1618
1619Details
1620^^^^^^^
1621
1622These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the
1623table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"),
1624how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each
1625hash value.
1626
1627Header Layout
1628"""""""""""""
1629
1630The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part.  The exact format of the
1631header is:
1632
1633.. code-block:: c
1634
1635  struct Header
1636  {
1637    uint32_t   magic;           // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection
1638    uint16_t   version;         // Version number
1639    uint16_t   hash_function;   // The hash function enumeration that was used
1640    uint32_t   bucket_count;    // The number of buckets in this hash table
1641    uint32_t   hashes_count;    // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table
1642    uint32_t   header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment
1643                                // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not
1644                                // include the size of the preceding fields
1645    HeaderData header_data;     // Implementation specific header data
1646  };
1647
1648The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'``
1649encoded as an ASCII integer.  This allows the detection of the start of the
1650hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table
1651can be correctly extracted.  The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit
1652``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the
1653future.  The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t``
1654enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table.
1655The current values for the hash function enumerations include:
1656
1657.. code-block:: c
1658
1659  enum HashFunctionType
1660  {
1661    eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function
1662  };
1663
1664``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets
1665are in the ``BUCKETS`` array.  ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit
1666hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets
1667are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array.  ``header_data_len`` specifies the size
1668in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of
1669this table.
1670
1671Fixed Lookup
1672""""""""""""
1673
1674The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data.
1675
1676.. code-block:: c
1677
1678  struct FixedTable
1679  {
1680    uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count];  // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below
1681    uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count];  // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table
1682    uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count];  // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above
1683  };
1684
1685``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array.  The
1686``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the
1687hash table.  Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets``
1688array that points to the data for the hash value.
1689
1690This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain
1691different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables.
1692This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in
1693later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing.
1694
1695DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot
1696of information for each name.  We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and
1697able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features
1698that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store
1699for each name.
1700
1701The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk.
1702We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs)
1703for each name.  To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or
1704Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name.  First comes the type of
1705the data in each atom:
1706
1707.. code-block:: c
1708
1709  enum AtomType
1710  {
1711    eAtomTypeNULL       = 0u,
1712    eAtomTypeDIEOffset  = 1u,   // DIE offset, check form for encoding
1713    eAtomTypeCUOffset   = 2u,   // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question
1714    eAtomTypeTag        = 3u,   // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2
1715    eAtomTypeNameFlags  = 4u,   // Flags from enum NameFlags
1716    eAtomTypeTypeFlags  = 5u,   // Flags from enum TypeFlags
1717  };
1718
1719The enumeration values and their meanings are:
1720
1721.. code-block:: none
1722
1723  eAtomTypeNULL       - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list
1724  eAtomTypeDIEOffset  - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name
1725  eAtomTypeCUOffset   - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE
1726  eAtomTypeDIETag     - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is
1727  eAtomTypeNameFlags  - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...)
1728  eAtomTypeTypeFlags  - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...)
1729
1730Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each
1731atom type data is encoded:
1732
1733.. code-block:: c
1734
1735  struct Atom
1736  {
1737    uint16_t type;  // AtomType enum value
1738    uint16_t form;  // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines
1739  };
1740
1741The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact
1742encoding of the data for the Atom type.  See the DWARF specification for the
1743``DW_FORM_`` definitions.
1744
1745.. code-block:: c
1746
1747  struct HeaderData
1748  {
1749    uint32_t die_offset_base;
1750    uint32_t atom_count;
1751    Atoms    atoms[atom_count0];
1752  };
1753
1754``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms
1755that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``,
1756``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``.  It also defines
1757what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large
1758each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data
1759should be interpreted.
1760
1761For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions +
1762globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and
1763the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom``
1764array to be:
1765
1766.. code-block:: c
1767
1768  HeaderData.atom_count = 1;
1769  HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset;
1770  HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4;
1771
1772This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is
1773encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4).  This allows a single name to have
1774multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined
1775function for instance.  Future tables could include more information about the
1776DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block,
1777or inlined.
1778
1779The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the
1780".debug_str" table.  The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which
1781may already contain copies of all of the strings.  This helps make sure, with
1782help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF
1783sections and keeps the hash table size down.  Another benefit to having the
1784compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that
1785DWARF parsing can be made much faster.
1786
1787After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data.  The hash data
1788needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data
1789at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple:
1790
1791.. code-block:: c
1792
1793  uint32_t str_offset
1794  uint32_t hash_data_count
1795  HashData[hash_data_count]
1796
1797If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the
1798hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision):
1799
1800.. code-block:: none
1801
1802  .------------.
1803  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1804  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1805  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1806  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1807  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1808  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1809  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1810  `------------'
1811
1812If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets:
1813
1814.. code-block:: none
1815
1816  .------------.
1817  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1818  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1819  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1820  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1821  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1822  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1823  | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print")
1824  | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count
1825  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1826  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1827  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1828  `------------'
1829
1830Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1
183132 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries.
1832
1833Contents
1834^^^^^^^^
1835
1836As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the
1837different tables.  For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``",
1838"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``".
1839
1840"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1841``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or
1842``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``,
1843``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``.  It also contains
1844``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and
1845static variables).  All global and static variables should be included,
1846including those scoped within functions and classes.  For example using the
1847following code:
1848
1849.. code-block:: c
1850
1851  static int var = 0;
1852
1853  void f ()
1854  {
1855    static int var = 0;
1856  }
1857
1858Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table.  All
1859functions should emit both their full names and their basenames.  For C or C++,
1860the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the
1861``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the
1862function basename.  If global or static variables have a mangled name in a
1863``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the
1864simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute.
1865
1866"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1867tag is one of:
1868
1869* DW_TAG_array_type
1870* DW_TAG_class_type
1871* DW_TAG_enumeration_type
1872* DW_TAG_pointer_type
1873* DW_TAG_reference_type
1874* DW_TAG_string_type
1875* DW_TAG_structure_type
1876* DW_TAG_subroutine_type
1877* DW_TAG_typedef
1878* DW_TAG_union_type
1879* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type
1880* DW_TAG_set_type
1881* DW_TAG_subrange_type
1882* DW_TAG_base_type
1883* DW_TAG_const_type
1884* DW_TAG_file_type
1885* DW_TAG_namelist
1886* DW_TAG_packed_type
1887* DW_TAG_volatile_type
1888* DW_TAG_restrict_type
1889* DW_TAG_atomic_type
1890* DW_TAG_interface_type
1891* DW_TAG_unspecified_type
1892* DW_TAG_shared_type
1893
1894Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must
1895not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero
1896value).  For example, using the following code:
1897
1898.. code-block:: c
1899
1900  int main ()
1901  {
1902    int *b = 0;
1903    return *b;
1904  }
1905
1906We get a few type DIEs:
1907
1908.. code-block:: none
1909
1910  0x00000067:     TAG_base_type [5]
1911                  AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed )
1912                  AT_name( "int" )
1913                  AT_byte_size( 0x04 )
1914
1915  0x0000006e:     TAG_pointer_type [6]
1916                  AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) )
1917                  AT_byte_size( 0x08 )
1918
1919The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``.
1920
1921"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs.
1922If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and
1923the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes).
1924Why?  This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the
1925standard C++ library that demangles mangled names.
1926
1927
1928Language Extensions and File Format Changes
1929^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1930
1931Objective-C Extensions
1932""""""""""""""""""""""
1933
1934"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an
1935Objective-C class.  The name used in the hash table is the name of the
1936Objective-C class itself.  If the Objective-C class has a category, then an
1937entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class
1938name with the category.  So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of
1939method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add
1940an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for
1941"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234.  This allows us to quickly
1942track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing
1943expressions.  It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where
1944anyone can add methods to a class.  The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also
1945emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually
1946contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more
1947compile units.  Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries.
1948So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions
1949given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class
1950functions for a class + category name.  This table does not contain any
1951selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names +
1952category) to all of the methods and class functions.  The selectors are added
1953as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section.
1954
1955In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is
1956the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString
1957stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only
1958("``stringWithCString:``").
1959
1960Mach-O Changes
1961""""""""""""""
1962
1963The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files.  For
1964mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with
1965names as follows:
1966
1967* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``"
1968* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``"
1969* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit)
1970* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``"
1971
1972.. _codeview:
1973
1974CodeView Debug Info Format
1975==========================
1976
1977LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this
1978section describes the design and implementation of that support.
1979
1980Format Background
1981-----------------
1982
1983CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the
1984majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the
1985overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information
1986from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently
1987merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is
1988generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a
198916-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind.
1990
1991Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object
1992file.  All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and
1993inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be
1994one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to
1995it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation,
1996the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing
1997to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object
1998file ``.debug$S`` sections.
1999
2000Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in
2001the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such
2002as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented
2003using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to
2004CodeView consumers and do not require type records.
2005
2006Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type
2007index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While
2008the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a
2009linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always
2010referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only
2011"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete,
2012non-forward-declaration type records.
2013
2014Working with CodeView
2015---------------------
2016
2017These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve
2018LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper
2019embedded in ``llvm-readobj``.
2020
2021* Testing MSVC's output::
2022
2023    $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file
2024    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj
2025
2026* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang::
2027
2028    $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm
2029
2030  Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases.
2031
2032* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata::
2033
2034    $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj
2035    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt
2036
2037  Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj
2038
2039Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type
2040records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records,
2041dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records
2042in LLVM's backend.
2043