1================================ 2Source Level Debugging with LLVM 3================================ 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 8Introduction 9============ 10 11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug 12information in LLVM. It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug 13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating 14front-ends or dealing directly with the information. Further, this document 15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like. 16 17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information 18-------------------------------------------- 19 20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important 21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code. 22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here. The 23important ones are: 24 25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the 26 compiler. No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to 27 be modified because of debugging information. 28 29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described 30 ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information. 31 32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages, 33 LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of 34 the source-level-language. 35 36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another. 37 LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language, 38 and the debugging information should work with any language. 39 40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler 41 to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging 42 formats. This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level 43 debuggers, like GDB or DBX. 44 45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of 46:ref:`debug records <debug_records>` to define a mapping 47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects. The description of 48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an 49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end 50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard 51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_). 52 53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns 54the stored debug information into source-language specific information. As 55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a 56specific language or family of languages. 57 58Debug information consumers 59--------------------------- 60 61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped 62away during the compilation process. This meta information provides an LLVM 63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source 64code. 65 66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and 67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and 68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView, 69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such 70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived 71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target 72debug info formats such as STABS. 73 74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools 75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original 76source from generated code. 77 78.. _intro_debugopt: 79 80Debug information and optimizations 81----------------------------------- 82 83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact 84well with optimizations and analysis. In particular, the LLVM debug 85information provides the following guarantees: 86 87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read 88 the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM 89 optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug 90 info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid 91 breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as 92 possible. Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the 93 current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program 94 variables, or calling functions that have been deleted. 95 96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging 97 information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they 98 perform aggressive optimizations. This means that, with effort, the LLVM 99 optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code. 100 101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from 102 happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup, 103 tail duplication, etc). 104 105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of 106 the program, using existing facilities. For example, duplicate 107 information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information 108 is automatically removed. 109 110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with 111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify 112the program as it executes from a debugger. Compiling a program with 113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and 114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call 115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program 116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away 117completely. 118 119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to 120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information. It can be run like 121this: 122 123.. code-block:: bash 124 125 % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks # or some other level 126 % make TEST=dbgopt 127 128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes. If 129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported 130as a failure. See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test 131infrastructure and how to run various tests. 132 133.. _format: 134 135Debugging information format 136============================ 137 138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for 139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without 140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information. In 141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from 142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes 143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function. 144 145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types, 146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end 147in the form of LLVM metadata. 148 149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and 150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc). It uses a generic 151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions, 152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and 153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target 154debugger to interpret the information. 155 156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some 157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps 158these to a minimum. The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes 159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects 160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_. These abstract objects are used by a 161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc. 162 163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects 164common to any source-language. :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout 165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends. 166 167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes 168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``. 169 170There are two models for defining the values of source variables at different 171states of the program and tracking these values through optimization and code 172generation: :ref:`debug records <debug_records>`, the current default, and 173:ref:`intrinsic function calls <format_common_intrinsics>`, which are 174non-default but currently supported for backwards compatibility - though these 175two models must never be mixed within an IR module. For an explanation of why 176we changed to the new model, how it works, and guidance on how to update old 177code or IR to use debug records, see the `RemoveDIs <RemoveDIsDebugInfo.html>`_ 178document. 179 180.. _debug_records: 181 182Debug Records 183---------------------------- 184 185Debug records define the value that a source variable has during execution of 186the program; they appear interleaved with instructions, although they are not 187instructions themselves and have no effect on the code generated by the 188compiler. 189 190LLVM uses several types of debug records to define source variables. The 191common syntax for these records is: 192 193.. code-block:: llvm 194 195 #dbg_<kind>([<arg>, ]* <DILocation>) 196 ; Using the intrinsic model, the above is equivalent to: 197 call void llvm.dbg.<kind>([metadata <arg>, ]*), !dbg <DILocation> 198 199Debug records are always printed with an extra level of indentation compared 200to instructions, and always have the prefix `#dbg_` and a list of 201comma-separated arguments in parentheses, as with a `call`. 202 203``#dbg_declare`` 204^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 205 206.. code-block:: llvm 207 208 #dbg_declare([Value|MDNode], DILocalVariable, DIExpression, DILocation) 209 210This record provides information about a local element (e.g., variable). 211The first argument is an SSA value corresponding to a variable address, and is 212typically a static alloca in the function entry block. The second argument is a 213`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of 214the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 215<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. The fourth argument is a `source location 216<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. A ``#dbg_declare`` record describes the 217*address* of a source variable. 218 219.. code-block:: llvm 220 221 %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4 222 #dbg_declare(ptr %i.addr, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 223 ; ... 224 !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 225 !2 = !DILocation(...) 226 ; ... 227 %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8 228 ; The address of i is buffer+64. 229 #dbg_declare(ptr %buffer, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64), !4) 230 ; ... 231 !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 232 !4 = !DILocation(...) 233 234A frontend should generate exactly one ``#dbg_declare`` record at the point 235of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the 236variable from memory to SSA values will replace this record with possibly 237multiple ``#dbg_value``` records. Passes that delete stores are effectively 238partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of ``#dbg_value`` records to 239track the source variable value when it is available. After optimization, there 240may be multiple ``#dbg_declare`` records describing the program points where 241the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same concrete source variable 242must agree on the memory location. 243 244 245``#dbg_value`` 246^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 247 248.. code-block:: llvm 249 250 #dbg_value([Value|DIArgList|MDNode], DILocalVariable, DIExpression, DILocation) 251 252This record provides information when a user source variable is set to a new 253value. The first argument is the new value. The second argument is a `local 254variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of the 255variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 256<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. The fourth argument is a `source location 257<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. 258 259A ``#dbg_value`` record describes the *value* of a source variable 260directly, not its address. Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may 261be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting 262the complex expression derives the direct value. 263 264``#dbg_assign`` 265^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 266.. toctree:: 267 :hidden: 268 269 AssignmentTracking 270 271.. code-block:: llvm 272 273 #dbg_assign( [Value|DIArgList|MDNode] Value, 274 DILocalVariable Variable, 275 DIExpression ValueExpression, 276 DIAssignID ID, 277 [Value|MDNode] Address, 278 DIExpression AddressExpression, 279 DILocation SourceLocation ) 280 281This record marks the position in IR where a source assignment occurred. It 282encodes the value of the variable. It references the store, if any, that 283performs the assignment, and the destination address. 284 285The first three arguments are the same as for a ``#dbg_value``. The fourth 286argument is a ``DIAssignID`` used to reference a store. The fifth is the 287destination of the store, the sixth is a `complex 288expression <LangRef.html#diexpression>`_ that modfies it, and the seventh is a 289`source location <LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. 290 291See :doc:`AssignmentTracking` for more info. 292 293Debugger intrinsic functions 294---------------------------- 295 296.. _format_common_intrinsics: 297 298In intrinsic-mode, LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to 299track source local variables through optimization and code generation. These 300intrinsic functions each correspond to one of the debug records above, with a 301few syntactic differences: each argument to a debugger intrinsic must be wrapped 302as metadata, meaning it must be prefixed with ``metadata``, and the 303``DILocation`` argument in each record must be a metadata attachment to the 304call instruction, meaning it appears after the argument list with the prefix 305``!dbg``. 306 307``llvm.dbg.declare`` 308^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 309 310.. code-block:: llvm 311 312 void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) 313 314This intrinsic is equivalent to ``#dbg_declare``: 315 316.. code-block:: llvm 317 318 #dbg_declare(i32* %i.addr, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 319 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1, 320 metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2 321 322``llvm.dbg.value`` 323^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 324 325.. code-block:: llvm 326 327 void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) 328 329This intrinsic is equivalent to ``#dbg_value``: 330 331.. code-block:: llvm 332 333 #dbg_value(i32 %i, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 334 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %i, metadata !1, 335 metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2 336 337``llvm.dbg.assign`` 338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 339 340.. code-block:: llvm 341 342 void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata) 343 344This intrinsic is equivalent to ``#dbg_assign``: 345 346.. code-block:: llvm 347 348 #dbg_assign(i32 %i, !1, !DIExpression(), !2, 349 ptr %i.addr, !DIExpression(), !3) 350 call void @llvm.dbg.assign( 351 metadata i32 %i, metadata !1, metadata !DIExpression(), metadata !2, 352 metadata ptr %i.addr, metadata !DIExpression(), metadata !3), !dbg !3 353 354 355Object lifetimes and scoping 356============================ 357 358In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or 359scopes limited to a subset of a function. In the C family of languages, for 360example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source 361block that they are defined in. In functional languages, values are only 362readable after they have been defined. Though this is a very obvious concept, 363it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this 364sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules. 365 366In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to 367llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information. Consider the 368following C fragment, for example: 369 370.. code-block:: c 371 372 1. void foo() { 373 2. int X = 21; 374 3. int Y = 22; 375 4. { 376 5. int Z = 23; 377 6. Z = X; 378 7. } 379 8. X = Y; 380 9. } 381 382Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this: 383 384.. code-block:: text 385 386 ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable 387 define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 { 388 entry: 389 %X = alloca i32, align 4 390 %Y = alloca i32, align 4 391 %Z = alloca i32, align 4 392 #dbg_declare(ptr %X, !11, !DIExpression(), !13) 393 store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !13 394 #dbg_declare(ptr %Y, !14, !DIExpression(), !15) 395 store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !15 396 #dbg_declare(ptr %Z, !16, !DIExpression(), !18) 397 store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !18 398 %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20 399 store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21 400 %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22 401 store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23 402 ret void, !dbg !24 403 } 404 405 attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" } 406 attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone } 407 408 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} 409 !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9} 410 !llvm.ident = !{!10} 411 412 !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2) 413 !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 414 !2 = !{} 415 !3 = !{!4} 416 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 417 !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6) 418 !6 = !{null} 419 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2} 420 !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 421 !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2} 422 !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"} 423 !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12) 424 !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 425 !13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 426 !14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12) 427 !15 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4) 428 !16 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12) 429 !17 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 430 !18 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !17) 431 !29 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !17) 432 !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !17) 433 !21 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4) 434 !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4) 435 !23 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4) 436 437 438This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging 439information. In particular, it shows how the ``#dbg_declare`` record and 440location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied 441together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements, 442variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function. 443 444.. code-block:: llvm 445 446 #dbg_declare(ptr %X, !11, !DIExpression(), !13) 447 ; [debug line = 2:9] [debug variable = X] 448 449The first record ``#dbg_declare`` encodes debugging information for the 450variable ``X``. The location ``!13`` at the end of the record provides 451scope information for the variable ``X``. 452 453.. code-block:: text 454 455 !13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 456 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 457 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 458 isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 459 460Here ``!13`` is metadata providing `location information 461<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a 462`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_. This way the location 463information parameter to the records indicates that the variable ``X`` is 464declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``. 465 466Now lets take another example. 467 468.. code-block:: llvm 469 470 #dbg_declare(ptr %Z, !16, !DIExpression(), !18) 471 ; [debug line = 5:11] [debug variable = Z] 472 473The third record ``#dbg_declare`` encodes debugging information for 474variable ``Z``. The metadata ``!18`` at the end of the record provides 475scope information for the variable ``Z``. 476 477.. code-block:: text 478 479 !17 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 480 !18 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !17) 481 482Here ``!18`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column 483number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!17``. The lexical scope itself resides 484inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above. 485 486The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward 487way to find instructions covered by a scope. 488 489Object lifetime in optimized code 490================================= 491 492In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a 493memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily 494optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can 495eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA 496values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values a 497``#dbg_value`` record is created for each assignment, recording the 498variable's new location. Compared with the ``#dbg_declare`` record: 499 500* A #dbg_value terminates the effect of any preceding #dbg_values for (any 501 overlapping fragments of) the specified variable. 502* The #dbg_value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream 503 the variable's value changes. 504* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a 505 constant value. 506 507Care must be taken to update ``#dbg_value`` records when optimization 508passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such 509changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any 510execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the 511developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed 512in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so 513risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist, 514damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their 515trust in the debugger. 516 517Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a 518redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``#dbg_value`` 519with operand ``poison`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations 520and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding 521these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the 522amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the 523remaining information. 524 525To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example: 526 527.. code-block:: llvm 528 529 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 530 entry: 531 #dbg_value(i32 0, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 532 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 533 truebr: 534 %tval = add i32 %bar, 1 535 #dbg_value(i32 %tval, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 536 %g1 = call i32 @gazonk() 537 br label %exit 538 falsebr: 539 %fval = add i32 %bar, 2 540 #dbg_value(i32 %fval, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 541 %g2 = call i32 @gazonk() 542 br label %exit 543 exit: 544 %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ] 545 %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ] 546 #dbg_value(i32 %merge, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 547 #dbg_value(i32 %g, !3, !DIExpression(), !4) 548 %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10 549 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 550 #dbg_value(i32 %toret, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 551 ret i32 %toret 552 } 553 554Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could, 555perhaps, be optimized into the following code: 556 557.. code-block:: llvm 558 559 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 560 entry: 561 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 562 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 563 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 564 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 565 ret i32 %toret 566 } 567 568What ``#dbg_value`` records should be placed to represent the original variable 569locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth 570#dbg_values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands 571(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we 572might consider this placement of #dbg_values: 573 574.. code-block:: llvm 575 576 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 577 entry: 578 #dbg_value(i32 0, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 579 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 580 #dbg_value(i32 %g, !3, !DIExpression(), !4) 581 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 582 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 583 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 584 #dbg_value(i32 %toret, !1, !DIExpression(), !4) 585 ret i32 %toret 586 } 587 588However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at 589the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments 590that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate 591the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an poison 592#dbg_value before the #dbg_value for ``!3``: 593 594.. code-block:: llvm 595 596 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 597 entry: 598 #dbg_value(i32 0, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 599 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 600 #dbg_value(i32 poison, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 601 #dbg_value(i32 %g, !3, !DIExpression(), !2) 602 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 603 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 604 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 605 #dbg_value(i32 %toret, !1, !DIExpression(), !2) 606 ret i32 %toret 607 } 608 609There are a few other #dbg_value configurations that mean it terminates 610dominating location definitions without adding a new location. The complete 611list is: 612 613* Any location operand is ``poison`` (or ``undef``). 614* Any location operand is an empty metadata tuple (``!{}``) (which cannot 615 occur in a ``!DIArgList``). 616* There are no location operands (empty ``DIArgList``) and the ``DIExpression`` 617 is empty. 618 619This class of #dbg_value that kills variable locations is called a "kill 620#dbg_value" or "kill location", and for legacy reasons the term "undef 621#dbg_value" may be used in existing code. The ``DbgVariableIntrinsic`` methods 622``isKillLocation`` and ``setKillLocation`` should be used where possible rather 623than inspecting location operands directly to check or set whether a #dbg_value 624is a kill location. 625 626In general, if any #dbg_value has its operand optimized out and cannot be 627recovered, then a kill #dbg_value is necessary to terminate earlier variable 628locations. Additional kill #dbg_values may be necessary when the debugger can 629observe re-ordering of assignments. 630 631How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen 632============================================================ 633 634LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes, 635ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and 636instruction ranges. This 637is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping 638instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations 639however the story is more complex. As each ``#dbg_value`` record 640represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the 641debug records effectively embed a small imperative program 642within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each 643variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions. 644From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable 645location fidelity are: 646 6471. Instruction Selection 6482. Register allocation 6493. Block layout 650 651each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can 652significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of 653different passes. 654 655Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations 656specified by ``#dbg_declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire 657duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table. 658Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored: 659frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a 660disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to 661describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway. 662 663Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR 664--------------------------------------------------- 665 666Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as 667it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must 668``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations. 669Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR 670there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR 671locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR 672instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as 673multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable 674locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into 675locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations, 676allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug 677metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection 678has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug 679metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the 680variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or 681otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes 682unavailable. 683 684Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out: 685in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug record, and in MIR 686the equivalent location is used. 687 688After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions 689corresponding to each ``#dbg_value`` record are inserted. There are two 690forms of this type of instruction. 691 692The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus: 693 694.. code-block:: text 695 696 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression() 697 698And has the following operands: 699 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register, 700 a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original 701 debug record referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable 702 location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` #dbg_value operand. 703 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is 704 directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The 705 ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the 706 latter. 707 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug record. 708 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug record. 709 710The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus: 711 712.. code-block:: text 713 714 DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2 715 716And has the following operands: 717 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug record. 718 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug record. 719 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable 720 location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first 721 operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location 722 operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated 723 by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression 724 <LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. 725 726The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the 727positions of their matching ``#dbg_value`` records in the IR block. As 728with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable 729assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some 730instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below). 731Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if 732they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry. 733 734To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider 735the following example: 736 737.. code-block:: llvm 738 739 define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) { 740 entry: 741 #dbg_value(i32 0, !3, !DIExpression(), !5) 742 br label %bb1, !dbg !5 743 744 bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %entry 745 %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ] 746 #dbg_value(i32 %bar.0, !3, !DIExpression(), !5) 747 %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5 748 #dbg_value(i32 *%addr1, !3, !DIExpression(), !5) 749 %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5 750 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5 751 #dbg_value(i32 *%addr2, !3, !DIExpression(), !5) 752 %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5 753 %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5 754 #dbg_value(i32 %add, !3, !DIExpression(), !5) 755 %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2 756 %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5 757 br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5 758 759 bb2: ; preds = %bb1 760 ret i32 0, !dbg !5 761 } 762 763If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced: 764 765.. code-block:: text 766 767 bb.0.entry: 768 successors: %bb.1(0x80000000) 769 liveins: $rdi 770 771 %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi 772 %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 773 DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 774 775 bb.1.bb1: 776 successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000) 777 778 %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1 779 DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 780 DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5 781 %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 782 %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5 783 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 784 %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5 785 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 786 %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2) 787 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5 788 JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5 789 JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5 790 791 bb.2.bb2: 792 %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 793 $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5 794 RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5 795 796Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``#dbg_value`` 797record in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing. 798Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded: 799 800* For the first #dbg_value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value. 801* The #dbg_value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register 802 ``%0``. 803* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction 804 (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding 805 the GEPs effect into the DIExpression. 806* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is 807 insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg`` 808 DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location. 809* The final #dbg_value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``. 810 811Instruction Scheduling 812---------------------- 813 814A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection 815and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can 816significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst 817case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such 818circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is 819better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state. 820Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any 821corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction 822is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration 823of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR: 824 825.. code-block:: text 826 827 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 828 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 829 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 830 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 831 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 832 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 833 834Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR: 835 836.. code-block:: text 837 838 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 839 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 840 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 841 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 842 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 843 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 844 845In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move 846the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order 847assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution 848above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because 849``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over 850misrepresenting the original program. 851 852In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following: 853 854.. code-block:: text 855 856 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2 857 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 858 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 859 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 860 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 861 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 862 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 863 864Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1`` 865disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the 866undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where 867an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur 868in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1`` 869would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This 870accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding 871portion of the original program. 872 873Variable locations during Register Allocation 874--------------------------------------------- 875 876To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the 877LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and 878deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy 879propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the 880VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original 881positions, translating virtual register references into their physical 882machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this 883pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by 884the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs 885because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by 886the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass. 887 888LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations 889----------------------------------------------- 890 891After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the 892LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims: 893 894* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills, 895* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block. 896 897After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than 898corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value, 899it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the 900block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is 901straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block 902requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which 903presents several difficulties: 904 905.. code-block:: text 906 907 define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 { 908 entry: 909 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 910 911 bb1: 912 %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ] 913 br label %exit, !dbg !26 914 915 truebr: 916 #dbg_value(i32 %input, !30, !DIExpression(), !24) 917 #dbg_value(i32 1, !23, !DIExpression(), !24) 918 %value1 = add i32 %input, 1 919 br label %bb1 920 921 falsebr: 922 #dbg_value(i32 %input, !30, !DIExpression(), !24) 923 #dbg_value(i32 2, !23, !DIExpression(), !24) 924 %value2 = add i32 %input, 2 925 br label %bb1 926 927 exit: 928 ret i32 %value, !dbg !30 929 } 930 931Here the difficulties are: 932 933* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order 934* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI 935 node 936 937As mentioned above, the ``#dbg_value`` records essentially form an 938imperative program embedded in the IR, with each record defining a variable 939location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way 940that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi 941nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for 942every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable 943location, which would lead to a large number of debugging records being 944generated. 945 946Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both 947conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing 948constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would 949want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined 950as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without 951inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing 952codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other #dbg_values 953to avoid adding very large numbers of records. 954 955Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control 956flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks: 957when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all 958predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the 959predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined. 960 961Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable 962locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little 963effort is then required by supporting classes (such as 964DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every 965valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From 966the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location 967of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location 968of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block. 969 970.. _ccxx_frontend: 971 972C/C++ front-end specific debug information 973========================================== 974 975The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a 976format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_ 977in terms of information content. This allows code generators to 978trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf 979information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to 980translate it as needed. 981 982This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs. Other 983languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to 984representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose 985to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model. 986As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM 987source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here. 988 989The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and 990the debug information that would best describe those constructs. The 991canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in 992``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the 993helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``. 994 995C/C++ source file information 996----------------------------- 997 998``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an 999instruction. One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using 1000``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``. 1001 1002.. code-block:: c++ 1003 1004 if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction 1005 unsigned Line = Loc->getLine(); 1006 StringRef File = Loc->getFilename(); 1007 StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory(); 1008 bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode(); 1009 } 1010 1011When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been 1012added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example 1013 1014.. code-block:: c++ 1015 1016 if (MyBoolean) { 1017 MyObject MO; 1018 ... 1019 } 1020 1021At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written 1022explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when 1023making code coverage. 1024 1025C/C++ global variable information 1026--------------------------------- 1027 1028Given an integer global variable declared as follows: 1029 1030.. code-block:: c 1031 1032 _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100; 1033 1034a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1035 1036.. code-block:: text 1037 1038 ;; 1039 ;; Define the global itself. 1040 ;; 1041 @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0 1042 1043 ;; 1044 ;; List of debug info of globals 1045 ;; 1046 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} 1047 1048 ;; Some unrelated metadata. 1049 !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7} 1050 !llvm.ident = !{!8} 1051 1052 ;; Define the global variable itself 1053 !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64) 1054 1055 ;; Define the compile unit. 1056 !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, 1057 producer: "clang version 4.0.0", 1058 isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, 1059 enums: !3, globals: !4) 1060 1061 ;; 1062 ;; Define the file 1063 ;; 1064 !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", 1065 directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 1066 1067 ;; An empty array. 1068 !3 = !{} 1069 1070 ;; The Array of Global Variables 1071 !4 = !{!0} 1072 1073 ;; 1074 ;; Define the type 1075 ;; 1076 !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 1077 1078 ;; Dwarf version to output. 1079 !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4} 1080 1081 ;; Debug info schema version. 1082 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 1083 1084 ;; Compiler identification 1085 !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"} 1086 1087 1088The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in 1089case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler 1090attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing) 1091alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output 1092for DW_AT_alignment value. 1093 1094C/C++ function information 1095-------------------------- 1096 1097Given a function declared as follows: 1098 1099.. code-block:: c 1100 1101 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { 1102 return 0; 1103 } 1104 1105a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1106 1107.. code-block:: text 1108 1109 ;; 1110 ;; Define the anchor for subprograms. 1111 ;; 1112 !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 1113 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 1114 flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, 1115 retainedNodes: !2) 1116 1117 ;; 1118 ;; Define the subprogram itself. 1119 ;; 1120 define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 { 1121 ... 1122 } 1123 1124C++ specific debug information 1125============================== 1126 1127C++ special member functions information 1128---------------------------------------- 1129 1130DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted. 1131 1132Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted: 1133 1134.. code-block:: c 1135 1136 class foo { 1137 public: 1138 foo(const foo&) = deleted; 1139 }; 1140 1141A C++ frontend would generate following: 1142 1143.. code-block:: text 1144 1145 !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted) 1146 1147and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as: 1148 1149.. code-block:: text 1150 1151 DW_TAG_subprogram [7] * 1152 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1] (indexed (00000006) string = "foo") 1153 DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1] (5) 1154 ... 1155 DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1156 1157Fortran specific debug information 1158================================== 1159 1160Fortran function information 1161---------------------------- 1162 1163There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE. This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive. 1164 1165.. code-block:: fortran 1166 1167 elemental function elem_func(a) 1168 1169a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1170 1171.. code-block:: text 1172 1173 !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1, 1174 line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6, 1175 spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0, 1176 retainedNodes: !2) 1177 1178and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as: 1179 1180.. code-block:: text 1181 1182 DW_TAG_subprogram [3] 1183 DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr] (0x0000000000000010 ".text") 1184 DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000001) 1185 ... 1186 DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1187 1188There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType. 1189 1190.. code-block:: fortran 1191 1192 character(len=*), intent(in) :: string 1193 1194a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1195 1196.. code-block:: text 1197 1198 !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15) 1199 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32) 1200 1201A fortran deferred-length character can also contain the information of raw storage of the characters in addition to the length of the string. This information is encoded in the stringLocationExpression field. Based on this information, DW_AT_data_location attribute is emitted in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info. 1202 1203 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), stringLocationExpression: !DIExpression(DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref), size: 32) 1204 1205and this will materialize in DWARF tags as: 1206 1207.. code-block:: text 1208 1209 DW_TAG_string_type 1210 DW_AT_name ("character(*)!2") 1211 DW_AT_string_length (0x00000064) 1212 0x00000064: DW_TAG_variable 1213 DW_AT_location (DW_OP_fbreg +16) 1214 DW_AT_type (0x00000083 "integer*8") 1215 DW_AT_data_location (DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref) 1216 ... 1217 DW_AT_artificial (true) 1218 1219A Fortran front-end may need to generate a *trampoline* function to call a 1220function defined in a different compilation unit. In this case, the front-end 1221can emit the following descriptor for the trampoline function: 1222 1223.. code-block:: text 1224 1225 !DISubprogram(name: "sub1_.t0p", linkageName: "sub1_.t0p", scope: !4, file: !4, type: !5, spFlags: DISPFlagLocalToUnit | DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !7, retainedNodes: !24, targetFuncName: "sub1_") 1226 1227The targetFuncName field is the name of the function that the trampoline 1228calls. This descriptor results in the following DWARF tag: 1229 1230.. code-block:: text 1231 1232 DW_TAG_subprogram 1233 ... 1234 DW_AT_linkage_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1235 DW_AT_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1236 DW_AT_trampoline ("sub1_") 1237 1238Debugging information format 1239============================ 1240 1241Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties 1242---------------------------------------------------------- 1243 1244Introduction 1245^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1246 1247Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using 1248declared properties. The language provides features to declare a property and 1249to let compiler synthesize accessor methods. 1250 1251The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance 1252variables and class variables. However, the debugger does not know anything 1253about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces. The debugger consumes 1254information generated by compiler in DWARF format. The format does not support 1255encoding of Objective C properties. This proposal describes DWARF extensions to 1256encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers 1257inspect Objective C properties. 1258 1259Proposal 1260^^^^^^^^ 1261 1262Objective C properties exist separately from class members. A property can be 1263defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each 1264access. Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar. 1265Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler, 1266in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the 1267standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but 1268there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar. 1269 1270To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the 1271``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a 1272given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description. 1273The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property. 1274 1275If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed 1276in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG 1277for that property. And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar 1278directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that 1279ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used 1280to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing 1281back to the property it is backing. 1282 1283The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion: 1284 1285.. code-block:: objc 1286 1287 @interface I1 { 1288 int n2; 1289 } 1290 1291 @property int p1; 1292 @property int p2; 1293 @end 1294 1295 @implementation I1 1296 @synthesize p1; 1297 @synthesize p2 = n2; 1298 @end 1299 1300This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output): 1301 1302.. code-block:: none 1303 1304 0x00000100: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1305 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1306 AT_name( "I1" ) 1307 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1308 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1309 1310 0x00000110 TAG_APPLE_property 1311 AT_name ( "p1" ) 1312 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1313 1314 0x00000120: TAG_APPLE_property 1315 AT_name ( "p2" ) 1316 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1317 1318 0x00000130: TAG_member [8] 1319 AT_name( "_p1" ) 1320 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" ) 1321 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1322 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1323 1324 0x00000140: TAG_member [8] 1325 AT_name( "n2" ) 1326 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" ) 1327 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1328 1329 0x00000150: AT_type( ( int ) ) 1330 1331Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an 1332auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives 1333with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example. But we actually 1334don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar 1335directly. 1336 1337Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in 1338the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in 1339the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation. In that case, 1340the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the 1341current translation unit. 1342 1343Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using 1344``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``. 1345 1346.. code-block:: objc 1347 1348 @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr; 1349 1350.. code-block:: none 1351 1352 TAG_APPLE_property [8] 1353 AT_name( "pr" ) 1354 AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) ) 1355 AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic) 1356 1357The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using 1358``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes. 1359 1360.. code-block:: objc 1361 1362 @interface I1 1363 @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3; 1364 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a; 1365 @end 1366 1367 @implementation I1 1368 @synthesize p3; 1369 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ } 1370 @end 1371 1372The DWARF for this would be: 1373 1374.. code-block:: none 1375 1376 0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1377 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1378 AT_name( "I1" ) 1379 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1380 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1381 1382 0x000003cd TAG_APPLE_property 1383 AT_name ( "p3" ) 1384 AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" ) 1385 AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1386 1387 0x000003f3: TAG_member [8] 1388 AT_name( "_p3" ) 1389 AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1390 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} ) 1391 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1392 1393New DWARF Tags 1394^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1395 1396+-----------------------+--------+ 1397| TAG | Value | 1398+=======================+========+ 1399| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 | 1400+-----------------------+--------+ 1401 1402New DWARF Attributes 1403^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1404 1405+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1406| Attribute | Value | Classes | 1407+================================+========+===========+ 1408| DW_AT_APPLE_property | 0x3fed | Reference | 1409+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1410| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter | 0x3fe9 | String | 1411+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1412| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter | 0x3fea | String | 1413+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1414| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant | 1415+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1416 1417New DWARF Constants 1418^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1419 1420+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1421| Name | Value | 1422+======================================+=======+ 1423| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly | 0x01 | 1424+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1425| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter | 0x02 | 1426+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1427| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign | 0x04 | 1428+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1429| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite | 0x08 | 1430+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1431| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain | 0x10 | 1432+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1433| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy | 0x20 | 1434+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1435| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic | 0x40 | 1436+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1437| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter | 0x80 | 1438+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1439| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic | 0x100 | 1440+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1441| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak | 0x200 | 1442+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1443| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong | 0x400 | 1444+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1445| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained | 0x800 | 1446+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1447| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability | 0x1000| 1448+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1449| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable | 0x2000| 1450+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1451| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class | 0x4000| 1452+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1453 1454Name Accelerator Tables 1455----------------------- 1456 1457Introduction 1458^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1459 1460The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a 1461debugger needs. The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries 1462in the table are publicly visible names only. This means no static or hidden 1463functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``". No static variables or private 1464class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``". Many compilers add different 1465things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or 1466clang. 1467 1468The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of 1469these tables. For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name 1470of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union, 1471the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name 1472given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information 1473entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member." 1474So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully 1475qualified name. Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as 1476"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or 1477"``a::b::c``". So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in 1478order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered 1479into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to 1480use. 1481 1482All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of 1483its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of 1484space in the object file. These tables, when they are written to disk, are not 1485sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting. 1486These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table 1487itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially 1488for large C++ programs. 1489 1490Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this 1491table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we 1492won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables. 1493At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we 1494need. 1495 1496These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs. LLDB 1497uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH. LLDB is then 1498often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in 1499namespace "``baz``". Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes 1500tables. Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression, 1501we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot. Having new 1502accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this 1503type of debugging experience greatly. 1504 1505We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory 1506from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing. We would also 1507be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain 1508exactly what we need. The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these 1509issues. In order to solve these issues we need to: 1510 1511* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is 1512* Lookups should be very fast 1513* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers 1514* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box 1515* Strict rules for the contents of tables 1516 1517Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse 1518of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not 1519duplicated. We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by 1520simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing. 1521 1522The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that 1523debuggers tend to do. Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the 1524mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find 1525the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches. In the 1526case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time. 1527 1528Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the 1529accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content. 1530 1531Hash Tables 1532^^^^^^^^^^^ 1533 1534Standard Hash Tables 1535"""""""""""""""""""" 1536 1537Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the 1538bucket contents: 1539 1540.. code-block:: none 1541 1542 .------------. 1543 | HEADER | 1544 |------------| 1545 | BUCKETS | 1546 |------------| 1547 | DATA | 1548 `------------' 1549 1550The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash: 1551 1552.. code-block:: none 1553 1554 .------------. 1555 | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0] 1556 | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1] 1557 | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2] 1558 | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3] 1559 | | ... 1560 | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1561 '------------' 1562 1563So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table 15640x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket. Each bucket must 1565contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data 1566for the current string value. 1567 1568.. code-block:: none 1569 1570 .------------. 1571 0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer 1572 | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash 1573 | "erase" | string value 1574 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1575 |------------| 1576 0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer 1577 | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash 1578 | "dump" | string value 1579 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1580 |------------| 1581 0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer 1582 | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash 1583 | "main" | string value 1584 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1585 `------------' 1586 1587The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the 1588negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present. So 1589if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit 1590hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``. We would need to go to 1591the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches. To 1592do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and 1593skip to the next bucket. Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and 1594touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash. All of 1595these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match. 1596 1597Name Hash Tables 1598"""""""""""""""" 1599 1600To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit 1601differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values, 1602followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then 1603the data for all hash values: 1604 1605.. code-block:: none 1606 1607 .-------------. 1608 | HEADER | 1609 |-------------| 1610 | BUCKETS | 1611 |-------------| 1612 | HASHES | 1613 |-------------| 1614 | OFFSETS | 1615 |-------------| 1616 | DATA | 1617 `-------------' 1618 1619The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array. By 1620making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow 1621ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as 1622possible. Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup 1623goes. If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions. So for a 1624table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash 1625values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and 1626``OFFSETS`` as: 1627 1628.. code-block:: none 1629 1630 .-------------------------. 1631 | HEADER.magic | uint32_t 1632 | HEADER.version | uint16_t 1633 | HEADER.hash_function | uint16_t 1634 | HEADER.bucket_count | uint32_t 1635 | HEADER.hashes_count | uint32_t 1636 | HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t 1637 | HEADER_DATA | HeaderData 1638 |-------------------------| 1639 | BUCKETS | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes 1640 |-------------------------| 1641 | HASHES | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values 1642 |-------------------------| 1643 | OFFSETS | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data 1644 |-------------------------| 1645 | ALL HASH DATA | 1646 `-------------------------' 1647 1648So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up 1649with: 1650 1651.. code-block:: none 1652 1653 .------------. 1654 | HEADER | 1655 |------------| 1656 | 0 | BUCKETS[0] 1657 | 2 | BUCKETS[1] 1658 | 5 | BUCKETS[2] 1659 | 6 | BUCKETS[3] 1660 | | ... 1661 | ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1662 |------------| 1663 | 0x........ | HASHES[0] 1664 | 0x........ | HASHES[1] 1665 | 0x........ | HASHES[2] 1666 | 0x........ | HASHES[3] 1667 | 0x........ | HASHES[4] 1668 | 0x........ | HASHES[5] 1669 | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1670 | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1671 | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1672 | 0x........ | HASHES[9] 1673 | 0x........ | HASHES[10] 1674 | 0x........ | HASHES[11] 1675 | 0x........ | HASHES[12] 1676 | 0x........ | HASHES[13] 1677 | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes] 1678 |------------| 1679 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0] 1680 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1] 1681 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2] 1682 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3] 1683 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4] 1684 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5] 1685 | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1686 | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1687 | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1688 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9] 1689 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10] 1690 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11] 1691 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12] 1692 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13] 1693 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes] 1694 |------------| 1695 | | 1696 | | 1697 | | 1698 | | 1699 | | 1700 |------------| 1701 0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase") 1702 | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase" 1703 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1704 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1705 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1706 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1707 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1708 |------------| 1709 0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision") 1710 | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision" 1711 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1712 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1713 | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump") 1714 | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump" 1715 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1716 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1717 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1718 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1719 |------------| 1720 0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main") 1721 | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main" 1722 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1723 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1724 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1725 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1726 | 0x........ | HashData[4] 1727 | 0x........ | HashData[5] 1728 | 0x........ | HashData[6] 1729 | 0x........ | HashData[7] 1730 | 0x........ | HashData[8] 1731 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1732 `------------' 1733 1734So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for 1735debugger lookup. If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we 1736would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit 1737hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``. ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which 1738is the index into the ``HASHES`` table. We would then compare any consecutive 173932 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in 1740``BUCKETS[3]``. We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo 1741``n_buckets`` is still 3. In the case of a failed lookup we would access the 1742memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes 1743before we know that we have no match. We don't end up marching through 1744multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache 1745lines being accessed as small as possible. 1746 1747The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J. 1748Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections. It is a 1749very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash 1750collisions. 1751 1752Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``. 1753 1754Details 1755^^^^^^^ 1756 1757These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the 1758table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"), 1759how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each 1760hash value. 1761 1762Header Layout 1763""""""""""""" 1764 1765The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part. The exact format of the 1766header is: 1767 1768.. code-block:: c 1769 1770 struct Header 1771 { 1772 uint32_t magic; // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection 1773 uint16_t version; // Version number 1774 uint16_t hash_function; // The hash function enumeration that was used 1775 uint32_t bucket_count; // The number of buckets in this hash table 1776 uint32_t hashes_count; // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table 1777 uint32_t header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment 1778 // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not 1779 // include the size of the preceding fields 1780 HeaderData header_data; // Implementation specific header data 1781 }; 1782 1783The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'`` 1784encoded as an ASCII integer. This allows the detection of the start of the 1785hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table 1786can be correctly extracted. The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit 1787``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the 1788future. The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t`` 1789enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table. 1790The current values for the hash function enumerations include: 1791 1792.. code-block:: c 1793 1794 enum HashFunctionType 1795 { 1796 eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function 1797 }; 1798 1799``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets 1800are in the ``BUCKETS`` array. ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit 1801hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets 1802are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array. ``header_data_len`` specifies the size 1803in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of 1804this table. 1805 1806Fixed Lookup 1807"""""""""""" 1808 1809The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data. 1810 1811.. code-block:: c 1812 1813 struct FixedTable 1814 { 1815 uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count]; // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below 1816 uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count]; // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table 1817 uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count]; // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above 1818 }; 1819 1820``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array. The 1821``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the 1822hash table. Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets`` 1823array that points to the data for the hash value. 1824 1825This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain 1826different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables. 1827This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in 1828later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing. 1829 1830DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot 1831of information for each name. We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and 1832able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features 1833that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store 1834for each name. 1835 1836The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk. 1837We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs) 1838for each name. To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or 1839Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name. First comes the type of 1840the data in each atom: 1841 1842.. code-block:: c 1843 1844 enum AtomType 1845 { 1846 eAtomTypeNULL = 0u, 1847 eAtomTypeDIEOffset = 1u, // DIE offset, check form for encoding 1848 eAtomTypeCUOffset = 2u, // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question 1849 eAtomTypeTag = 3u, // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2 1850 eAtomTypeNameFlags = 4u, // Flags from enum NameFlags 1851 eAtomTypeTypeFlags = 5u, // Flags from enum TypeFlags 1852 }; 1853 1854The enumeration values and their meanings are: 1855 1856.. code-block:: none 1857 1858 eAtomTypeNULL - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list 1859 eAtomTypeDIEOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name 1860 eAtomTypeCUOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE 1861 eAtomTypeDIETag - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is 1862 eAtomTypeNameFlags - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...) 1863 eAtomTypeTypeFlags - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...) 1864 1865Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each 1866atom type data is encoded: 1867 1868.. code-block:: c 1869 1870 struct Atom 1871 { 1872 uint16_t type; // AtomType enum value 1873 uint16_t form; // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines 1874 }; 1875 1876The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact 1877encoding of the data for the Atom type. See the DWARF specification for the 1878``DW_FORM_`` definitions. 1879 1880.. code-block:: c 1881 1882 struct HeaderData 1883 { 1884 uint32_t die_offset_base; 1885 uint32_t atom_count; 1886 Atoms atoms[atom_count0]; 1887 }; 1888 1889``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms 1890that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``, 1891``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``. It also defines 1892what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large 1893each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data 1894should be interpreted. 1895 1896For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions + 1897globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and 1898the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom`` 1899array to be: 1900 1901.. code-block:: c 1902 1903 HeaderData.atom_count = 1; 1904 HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset; 1905 HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4; 1906 1907This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is 1908encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4). This allows a single name to have 1909multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined 1910function for instance. Future tables could include more information about the 1911DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block, 1912or inlined. 1913 1914The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the 1915".debug_str" table. The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which 1916may already contain copies of all of the strings. This helps make sure, with 1917help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF 1918sections and keeps the hash table size down. Another benefit to having the 1919compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that 1920DWARF parsing can be made much faster. 1921 1922After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data. The hash data 1923needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data 1924at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple: 1925 1926.. code-block:: c 1927 1928 uint32_t str_offset 1929 uint32_t hash_data_count 1930 HashData[hash_data_count] 1931 1932If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the 1933hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision): 1934 1935.. code-block:: none 1936 1937 .------------. 1938 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1939 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1940 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1941 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1942 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1943 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1944 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1945 `------------' 1946 1947If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets: 1948 1949.. code-block:: none 1950 1951 .------------. 1952 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1953 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1954 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1955 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1956 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1957 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1958 | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print") 1959 | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count 1960 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1961 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1962 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1963 `------------' 1964 1965Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1 196632 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries. 1967 1968Contents 1969^^^^^^^^ 1970 1971As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the 1972different tables. For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``", 1973"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``". 1974 1975"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1976``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or 1977``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``, 1978``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``. It also contains 1979``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and 1980static variables). All global and static variables should be included, 1981including those scoped within functions and classes. For example using the 1982following code: 1983 1984.. code-block:: c 1985 1986 static int var = 0; 1987 1988 void f () 1989 { 1990 static int var = 0; 1991 } 1992 1993Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table. All 1994functions should emit both their full names and their basenames. For C or C++, 1995the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the 1996``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the 1997function basename. If global or static variables have a mangled name in a 1998``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the 1999simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute. 2000 2001"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 2002tag is one of: 2003 2004* DW_TAG_array_type 2005* DW_TAG_class_type 2006* DW_TAG_enumeration_type 2007* DW_TAG_pointer_type 2008* DW_TAG_reference_type 2009* DW_TAG_string_type 2010* DW_TAG_structure_type 2011* DW_TAG_subroutine_type 2012* DW_TAG_typedef 2013* DW_TAG_union_type 2014* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type 2015* DW_TAG_set_type 2016* DW_TAG_subrange_type 2017* DW_TAG_base_type 2018* DW_TAG_const_type 2019* DW_TAG_immutable_type 2020* DW_TAG_file_type 2021* DW_TAG_namelist 2022* DW_TAG_packed_type 2023* DW_TAG_volatile_type 2024* DW_TAG_restrict_type 2025* DW_TAG_atomic_type 2026* DW_TAG_interface_type 2027* DW_TAG_unspecified_type 2028* DW_TAG_shared_type 2029 2030Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must 2031not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero 2032value). For example, using the following code: 2033 2034.. code-block:: c 2035 2036 int main () 2037 { 2038 int *b = 0; 2039 return *b; 2040 } 2041 2042We get a few type DIEs: 2043 2044.. code-block:: none 2045 2046 0x00000067: TAG_base_type [5] 2047 AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed ) 2048 AT_name( "int" ) 2049 AT_byte_size( 0x04 ) 2050 2051 0x0000006e: TAG_pointer_type [6] 2052 AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) ) 2053 AT_byte_size( 0x08 ) 2054 2055The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``. 2056 2057"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs. 2058If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and 2059the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes). 2060Why? This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the 2061standard C++ library that demangles mangled names. 2062 2063 2064Language Extensions and File Format Changes 2065^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2066 2067Objective-C Extensions 2068"""""""""""""""""""""" 2069 2070"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an 2071Objective-C class. The name used in the hash table is the name of the 2072Objective-C class itself. If the Objective-C class has a category, then an 2073entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class 2074name with the category. So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of 2075method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add 2076an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for 2077"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234. This allows us to quickly 2078track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing 2079expressions. It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where 2080anyone can add methods to a class. The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also 2081emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually 2082contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more 2083compile units. Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries. 2084So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions 2085given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class 2086functions for a class + category name. This table does not contain any 2087selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names + 2088category) to all of the methods and class functions. The selectors are added 2089as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section. 2090 2091In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is 2092the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString 2093stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only 2094("``stringWithCString:``"). 2095 2096Mach-O Changes 2097"""""""""""""" 2098 2099The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files. For 2100mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with 2101names as follows: 2102 2103* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``" 2104* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``" 2105* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit) 2106* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``" 2107 2108.. _codeview: 2109 2110CodeView Debug Info Format 2111========================== 2112 2113LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this 2114section describes the design and implementation of that support. 2115 2116Format Background 2117----------------- 2118 2119CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the 2120majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the 2121overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information 2122from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently 2123merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is 2124generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a 212516-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind. 2126 2127Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object 2128file. All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and 2129inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be 2130one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to 2131it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation, 2132the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing 2133to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object 2134file ``.debug$S`` sections. 2135 2136Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in 2137the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such 2138as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented 2139using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to 2140CodeView consumers and do not require type records. 2141 2142Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type 2143index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While 2144the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a 2145linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always 2146referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only 2147"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete, 2148non-forward-declaration type records. 2149 2150Working with CodeView 2151--------------------- 2152 2153These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve 2154LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper 2155embedded in ``llvm-readobj``. 2156 2157* Testing MSVC's output:: 2158 2159 $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file 2160 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj 2161 2162* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang:: 2163 2164 $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm 2165 2166 Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases. 2167 2168* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata:: 2169 2170 $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj 2171 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt 2172 2173 Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj 2174 2175Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type 2176records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records, 2177dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records 2178in LLVM's backend. 2179