1================================ 2Source Level Debugging with LLVM 3================================ 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 8Introduction 9============ 10 11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug 12information in LLVM. It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug 13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating 14front-ends or dealing directly with the information. Further, this document 15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like. 16 17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information 18-------------------------------------------- 19 20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important 21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code. 22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here. The 23important ones are: 24 25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the 26 compiler. No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to 27 be modified because of debugging information. 28 29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described 30 ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information. 31 32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages, 33 LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of 34 the source-level-language. 35 36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another. 37 LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language, 38 and the debugging information should work with any language. 39 40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler 41 to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging 42 formats. This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level 43 debuggers, like GDB or DBX. 44 45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of 46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping 47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects. The description of 48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an 49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end 50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard 51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_). 52 53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns 54the stored debug information into source-language specific information. As 55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a 56specific language or family of languages. 57 58Debug information consumers 59--------------------------- 60 61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped 62away during the compilation process. This meta information provides an LLVM 63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source 64code. 65 66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and 67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and 68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView, 69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such 70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived 71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target 72debug info formats such as STABS. 73 74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools 75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original 76source from generated code. 77 78.. _intro_debugopt: 79 80Debug information and optimizations 81----------------------------------- 82 83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact 84well with optimizations and analysis. In particular, the LLVM debug 85information provides the following guarantees: 86 87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read 88 the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM 89 optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug 90 info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid 91 breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as 92 possible. Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the 93 current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program 94 variables, or calling functions that have been deleted. 95 96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging 97 information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they 98 perform aggressive optimizations. This means that, with effort, the LLVM 99 optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code. 100 101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from 102 happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup, 103 tail duplication, etc). 104 105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of 106 the program, using existing facilities. For example, duplicate 107 information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information 108 is automatically removed. 109 110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with 111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify 112the program as it executes from a debugger. Compiling a program with 113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and 114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call 115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program 116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away 117completely. 118 119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to 120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information. It can be run like 121this: 122 123.. code-block:: bash 124 125 % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks # or some other level 126 % make TEST=dbgopt 127 128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes. If 129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported 130as a failure. See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test 131infrastructure and how to run various tests. 132 133.. _format: 134 135Debugging information format 136============================ 137 138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for 139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without 140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information. In 141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from 142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes 143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function. 144 145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types, 146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end 147in the form of LLVM metadata. 148 149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and 150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc). It uses a generic 151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions, 152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and 153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target 154debugger to interpret the information. 155 156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some 157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps 158these to a minimum. The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes 159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects 160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_. These abstract objects are used by a 161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc. 162 163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects 164common to any source-language. :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout 165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends. 166 167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes 168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``. 169 170.. _format_common_intrinsics: 171 172Debugger intrinsic functions 173---------------------------- 174 175LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to 176track source local variables through optimization and code generation. 177 178``llvm.dbg.addr`` 179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 180 181.. code-block:: llvm 182 183 void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata) 184 185This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable). 186The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a 187static alloca in the function entry block. The second argument is a 188`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of 189the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 190<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the 191*address* of a source variable. 192 193.. code-block:: text 194 195 %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4 196 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1, 197 metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2 198 !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 199 !2 = !DILocation(...) 200 ... 201 %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8 202 ; The address of i is buffer+64. 203 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3, 204 metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4 205 !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 206 !4 = !DILocation(...) 207 208A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point 209of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the 210variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly 211multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively 212partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value`` 213and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available. 214After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing 215the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same 216concrete source variable must agree on the memory location. 217 218 219``llvm.dbg.declare`` 220^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 221 222.. code-block:: llvm 223 224 void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) 225 226This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be 227one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable 228<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if 229a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that 230address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire 231lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info 232in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it, 233and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases. 234 235 236``llvm.dbg.value`` 237^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 238 239.. code-block:: llvm 240 241 void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) 242 243This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new 244value. The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata). The second 245argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a 246description of the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 247<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. 248 249An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable 250directly, not its address. Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may 251be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting 252the complex expression derives the direct value. 253 254``llvm.dbg.assign`` 255^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 256 257.. code-block:: llvm 258 259 void @llvm.dbg.assign(Value *Value, 260 DIExpression *ValueExpression, 261 DILocalVariable *Variable, 262 DIAssignID *ID, 263 Value *Address, 264 DIExpression *AddressExpression) 265 266This intrinsic marks the position in IR where a source assignment occured. It 267encodes the value of the variable. It references the store, if any, that 268performs the assignment, and the destination address. 269 270The first three arguments are the same as for an ``llvm.dbg.value``. The fourth 271argument is a ``DIAssignID`` used to reference a store. The fifth is the 272destination of the store (wrapped as metadata), and the sixth is a `complex 273expression <LangRef.html#diexpression>`_ that modfies it. 274 275The formal LLVM-IR signature is: 276 277.. code-block:: llvm 278 279 void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata) 280 281 282See :doc:`AssignmentTracking` for more info. 283 284Object lifetimes and scoping 285============================ 286 287In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or 288scopes limited to a subset of a function. In the C family of languages, for 289example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source 290block that they are defined in. In functional languages, values are only 291readable after they have been defined. Though this is a very obvious concept, 292it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this 293sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules. 294 295In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to 296llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information. Consider the 297following C fragment, for example: 298 299.. code-block:: c 300 301 1. void foo() { 302 2. int X = 21; 303 3. int Y = 22; 304 4. { 305 5. int Z = 23; 306 6. Z = X; 307 7. } 308 8. X = Y; 309 9. } 310 311.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the 312 default in clang. 313 314Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this: 315 316.. code-block:: text 317 318 ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable 319 define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 { 320 entry: 321 %X = alloca i32, align 4 322 %Y = alloca i32, align 4 323 %Z = alloca i32, align 4 324 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 325 store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !14 326 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !15, metadata !13), !dbg !16 327 store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !16 328 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 329 store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !19 330 %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20 331 store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21 332 %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22 333 store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23 334 ret void, !dbg !24 335 } 336 337 ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone 338 declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1 339 340 attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" } 341 attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone } 342 343 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} 344 !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9} 345 !llvm.ident = !{!10} 346 347 !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2) 348 !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 349 !2 = !{} 350 !3 = !{!4} 351 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 352 !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6) 353 !6 = !{null} 354 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2} 355 !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 356 !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2} 357 !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"} 358 !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12) 359 !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 360 !13 = !DIExpression() 361 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 362 !15 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12) 363 !16 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4) 364 !17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12) 365 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 366 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 367 !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !18) 368 !21 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !18) 369 !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4) 370 !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4) 371 !24 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4) 372 373 374This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging 375information. In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and 376location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied 377together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements, 378variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function. 379 380.. code-block:: llvm 381 382 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 383 ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X] 384 385The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the 386variable ``X``. The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides 387scope information for the variable ``X``. 388 389.. code-block:: text 390 391 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 392 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 393 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 394 isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 395 396Here ``!14`` is metadata providing `location information 397<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a 398`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_. This way the location 399information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is 400declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``. 401 402Now lets take another example. 403 404.. code-block:: llvm 405 406 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 407 ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z] 408 409The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for 410variable ``Z``. The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides 411scope information for the variable ``Z``. 412 413.. code-block:: text 414 415 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 416 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 417 418Here ``!19`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column 419number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!18``. The lexical scope itself resides 420inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above. 421 422The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward 423way to find instructions covered by a scope. 424 425Object lifetime in optimized code 426================================= 427 428In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a 429memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily 430optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can 431eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA 432values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an 433``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the 434variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic: 435 436* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceding dbg.values for (any 437 overlapping fragments of) the specified variable. 438* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream 439 the variable's value changes. 440* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a 441 constant value. 442 443Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization 444passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such 445changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any 446execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the 447developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed 448in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so 449risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist, 450damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their 451trust in the debugger. 452 453Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a 454redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value`` 455with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations 456and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding 457these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the 458amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the 459remaining information. 460 461To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example: 462 463.. code-block:: llvm 464 465 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 466 entry: 467 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 468 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 469 truebr: 470 %tval = add i32 %bar, 1 471 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 472 %g1 = call i32 @gazonk() 473 br label %exit 474 falsebr: 475 %fval = add i32 %bar, 2 476 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 477 %g2 = call i32 @gazonk() 478 br label %exit 479 exit: 480 %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ] 481 %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ] 482 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2) 483 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 484 %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10 485 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 486 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 487 ret i32 %toret 488 } 489 490Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could, 491perhaps, be optimized into the following code: 492 493.. code-block:: llvm 494 495 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 496 entry: 497 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 498 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 499 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 500 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 501 ret i32 %toret 502 } 503 504What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable 505locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth 506dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands 507(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we 508might consider this placement of dbg.values: 509 510.. code-block:: llvm 511 512 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 513 entry: 514 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 515 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 516 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 517 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 518 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 519 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 520 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 521 ret i32 %toret 522 } 523 524However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at 525the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments 526that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate 527the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef 528dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``: 529 530.. code-block:: llvm 531 532 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 533 entry: 534 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 535 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 536 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2) 537 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 538 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 539 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 540 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 541 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 542 ret i32 %toret 543 } 544 545In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be 546recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable 547locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can 548observe re-ordering of assignments. 549 550How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen 551============================================================ 552 553LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes, 554ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and 555instruction ranges. This 556is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping 557instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations 558however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic 559represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the 560variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program 561within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each 562variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions. 563From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable 564location fidelity are: 565 5661. Instruction Selection 5672. Register allocation 5683. Block layout 569 570each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can 571significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of 572different passes. 573 574Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations 575specified by ``llvm.dbg.declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire 576duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table. 577Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored: 578frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a 579disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to 580describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway. 581 582Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR 583--------------------------------------------------- 584 585Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as 586it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must 587``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations. 588Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR 589there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR 590locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR 591instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as 592multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable 593locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into 594locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations, 595allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug 596metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection 597has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug 598metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the 599variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or 600otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes 601unavailable. 602 603Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out: 604in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR 605the equivalent location is used. 606 607After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions 608corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are 609inserted. There are two forms of this type of instruction. 610 611The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus: 612 613.. code-block:: text 614 615 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression() 616 617And has the following operands: 618 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register, 619 a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original 620 debug intrinsic referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable 621 location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand. 622 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is 623 directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The 624 ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the 625 latter. 626 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic. 627 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic. 628 629The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus: 630 631.. code-block:: text 632 633 DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2 634 635And has the following operands: 636 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic. 637 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic. 638 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable 639 location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first 640 operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location 641 operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated 642 by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression 643 <LangRef.html#diexpression>`. 644 645The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the 646positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block. As 647with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable 648assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some 649instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below). 650Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if 651they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry. 652 653To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider 654the following example: 655 656.. code-block:: llvm 657 658 define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) { 659 entry: 660 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 661 br label %bb1, !dbg !5 662 663 bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %entry 664 %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ] 665 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 666 %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5 667 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 668 %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5 669 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5 670 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 671 %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5 672 %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5 673 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 674 %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2 675 %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5 676 br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5 677 678 bb2: ; preds = %bb1 679 ret i32 0, !dbg !5 680 } 681 682If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced: 683 684.. code-block:: text 685 686 bb.0.entry: 687 successors: %bb.1(0x80000000) 688 liveins: $rdi 689 690 %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi 691 %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 692 DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 693 694 bb.1.bb1: 695 successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000) 696 697 %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1 698 DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 699 DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5 700 %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 701 %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5 702 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 703 %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5 704 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 705 %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2) 706 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5 707 JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5 708 JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5 709 710 bb.2.bb2: 711 %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 712 $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5 713 RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5 714 715Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value`` 716intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing. 717Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded: 718 719* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value. 720* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register 721 ``%0``. 722* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction 723 (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding 724 the GEPs effect into the DIExpression. 725* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is 726 insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg`` 727 DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location. 728* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``. 729 730Instruction Scheduling 731---------------------- 732 733A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection 734and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can 735significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst 736case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such 737circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is 738better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state. 739Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any 740corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction 741is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration 742of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR: 743 744.. code-block:: text 745 746 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 747 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 748 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 749 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 750 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 751 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 752 753Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR: 754 755.. code-block:: text 756 757 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 758 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 759 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 760 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 761 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 762 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 763 764In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move 765the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order 766assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution 767above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because 768``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over 769misrepresenting the original program. 770 771In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following: 772 773.. code-block:: text 774 775 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2 776 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 777 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 778 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 779 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 780 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 781 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 782 783Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1`` 784disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the 785undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where 786an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur 787in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1`` 788would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This 789accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding 790portion of the original program. 791 792Variable locations during Register Allocation 793--------------------------------------------- 794 795To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the 796LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and 797deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy 798propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the 799VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original 800positions, translating virtual register references into their physical 801machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this 802pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by 803the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs 804because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by 805the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass. 806 807LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations 808----------------------------------------------- 809 810After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the 811LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims: 812 813* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills, 814* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block. 815 816After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than 817corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value, 818it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the 819block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is 820straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block 821requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which 822presents several difficulties: 823 824.. code-block:: text 825 826 define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 { 827 entry: 828 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 829 830 bb1: 831 %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ] 832 br label %exit, !dbg !26 833 834 truebr: 835 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 836 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 837 %value1 = add i32 %input, 1 838 br label %bb1 839 840 falsebr: 841 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 842 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 843 %value = add i32 %input, 2 844 br label %bb1 845 846 exit: 847 ret i32 %value, !dbg !30 848 } 849 850Here the difficulties are: 851 852* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order 853* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI 854 node 855 856As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an 857imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable 858location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way 859that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi 860nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for 861every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable 862location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being 863generated. 864 865Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both 866conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing 867constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would 868want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined 869as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without 870inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing 871codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values 872to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics. 873 874Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control 875flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks: 876when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all 877predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the 878predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined. 879 880Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable 881locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little 882effort is then required by supporting classes (such as 883DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every 884valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From 885the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location 886of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location 887of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block. 888 889.. _ccxx_frontend: 890 891C/C++ front-end specific debug information 892========================================== 893 894The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a 895format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_ 896in terms of information content. This allows code generators to 897trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf 898information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to 899translate it as needed. 900 901This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs. Other 902languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to 903representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose 904to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model. 905As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM 906source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here. 907 908The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and 909the debug information that would best describe those constructs. The 910canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in 911``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the 912helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``. 913 914C/C++ source file information 915----------------------------- 916 917``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an 918instruction. One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using 919``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``. 920 921.. code-block:: c++ 922 923 if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction 924 unsigned Line = Loc->getLine(); 925 StringRef File = Loc->getFilename(); 926 StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory(); 927 bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode(); 928 } 929 930When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been 931added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example 932 933.. code-block:: c++ 934 935 if (MyBoolean) { 936 MyObject MO; 937 ... 938 } 939 940At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written 941explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when 942making code coverage. 943 944C/C++ global variable information 945--------------------------------- 946 947Given an integer global variable declared as follows: 948 949.. code-block:: c 950 951 _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100; 952 953a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 954 955.. code-block:: text 956 957 ;; 958 ;; Define the global itself. 959 ;; 960 @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0 961 962 ;; 963 ;; List of debug info of globals 964 ;; 965 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} 966 967 ;; Some unrelated metadata. 968 !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7} 969 !llvm.ident = !{!8} 970 971 ;; Define the global variable itself 972 !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64) 973 974 ;; Define the compile unit. 975 !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, 976 producer: "clang version 4.0.0", 977 isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, 978 enums: !3, globals: !4) 979 980 ;; 981 ;; Define the file 982 ;; 983 !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", 984 directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 985 986 ;; An empty array. 987 !3 = !{} 988 989 ;; The Array of Global Variables 990 !4 = !{!0} 991 992 ;; 993 ;; Define the type 994 ;; 995 !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 996 997 ;; Dwarf version to output. 998 !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4} 999 1000 ;; Debug info schema version. 1001 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 1002 1003 ;; Compiler identification 1004 !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"} 1005 1006 1007The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in 1008case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler 1009attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing) 1010alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output 1011for DW_AT_alignment value. 1012 1013C/C++ function information 1014-------------------------- 1015 1016Given a function declared as follows: 1017 1018.. code-block:: c 1019 1020 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { 1021 return 0; 1022 } 1023 1024a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1025 1026.. code-block:: text 1027 1028 ;; 1029 ;; Define the anchor for subprograms. 1030 ;; 1031 !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 1032 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 1033 flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, 1034 retainedNodes: !2) 1035 1036 ;; 1037 ;; Define the subprogram itself. 1038 ;; 1039 define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 { 1040 ... 1041 } 1042 1043C++ specific debug information 1044============================== 1045 1046C++ special member functions information 1047---------------------------------------- 1048 1049DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted. 1050 1051Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted: 1052 1053.. code-block:: c 1054 1055 class foo { 1056 public: 1057 foo(const foo&) = deleted; 1058 }; 1059 1060A C++ frontend would generate following: 1061 1062.. code-block:: text 1063 1064 !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted) 1065 1066and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as: 1067 1068.. code-block:: text 1069 1070 DW_TAG_subprogram [7] * 1071 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1] (indexed (00000006) string = "foo") 1072 DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1] (5) 1073 ... 1074 DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1075 1076Fortran specific debug information 1077================================== 1078 1079Fortran function information 1080---------------------------- 1081 1082There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE. This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive. 1083 1084.. code-block:: fortran 1085 1086 elemental function elem_func(a) 1087 1088a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1089 1090.. code-block:: text 1091 1092 !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1, 1093 line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6, 1094 spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0, 1095 retainedNodes: !2) 1096 1097and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as: 1098 1099.. code-block:: text 1100 1101 DW_TAG_subprogram [3] 1102 DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr] (0x0000000000000010 ".text") 1103 DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000001) 1104 ... 1105 DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1106 1107There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType. 1108 1109.. code-block:: fortran 1110 1111 character(len=*), intent(in) :: string 1112 1113a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1114 1115.. code-block:: text 1116 1117 !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15) 1118 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32) 1119 1120A fortran deferred-length character can also contain the information of raw storage of the characters in addition to the length of the string. This information is encoded in the stringLocationExpression field. Based on this information, DW_AT_data_location attribute is emitted in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info. 1121 1122 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), stringLocationExpression: !DIExpression(DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref), size: 32) 1123 1124and this will materialize in DWARF tags as: 1125 1126.. code-block:: text 1127 1128 DW_TAG_string_type 1129 DW_AT_name ("character(*)!2") 1130 DW_AT_string_length (0x00000064) 1131 0x00000064: DW_TAG_variable 1132 DW_AT_location (DW_OP_fbreg +16) 1133 DW_AT_type (0x00000083 "integer*8") 1134 DW_AT_data_location (DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref) 1135 ... 1136 DW_AT_artificial (true) 1137 1138A Fortran front-end may need to generate a *trampoline* function to call a 1139function defined in a different compilation unit. In this case, the front-end 1140can emit the following descriptor for the trampoline function: 1141 1142.. code-block:: text 1143 1144 !DISubprogram(name: "sub1_.t0p", linkageName: "sub1_.t0p", scope: !4, file: !4, type: !5, spFlags: DISPFlagLocalToUnit | DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !7, retainedNodes: !24, targetFuncName: "sub1_") 1145 1146The targetFuncName field is the name of the function that the trampoline 1147calls. This descriptor results in the following DWARF tag: 1148 1149.. code-block:: text 1150 1151 DW_TAG_subprogram 1152 ... 1153 DW_AT_linkage_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1154 DW_AT_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1155 DW_AT_trampoline ("sub1_") 1156 1157Debugging information format 1158============================ 1159 1160Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties 1161---------------------------------------------------------- 1162 1163Introduction 1164^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1165 1166Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using 1167declared properties. The language provides features to declare a property and 1168to let compiler synthesize accessor methods. 1169 1170The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance 1171variables and class variables. However, the debugger does not know anything 1172about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces. The debugger consumes 1173information generated by compiler in DWARF format. The format does not support 1174encoding of Objective C properties. This proposal describes DWARF extensions to 1175encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers 1176inspect Objective C properties. 1177 1178Proposal 1179^^^^^^^^ 1180 1181Objective C properties exist separately from class members. A property can be 1182defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each 1183access. Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar. 1184Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler, 1185in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the 1186standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but 1187there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar. 1188 1189To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the 1190``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a 1191given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description. 1192The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property. 1193 1194If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed 1195in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG 1196for that property. And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar 1197directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that 1198ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used 1199to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing 1200back to the property it is backing. 1201 1202The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion: 1203 1204.. code-block:: objc 1205 1206 @interface I1 { 1207 int n2; 1208 } 1209 1210 @property int p1; 1211 @property int p2; 1212 @end 1213 1214 @implementation I1 1215 @synthesize p1; 1216 @synthesize p2 = n2; 1217 @end 1218 1219This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output): 1220 1221.. code-block:: none 1222 1223 0x00000100: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1224 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1225 AT_name( "I1" ) 1226 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1227 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1228 1229 0x00000110 TAG_APPLE_property 1230 AT_name ( "p1" ) 1231 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1232 1233 0x00000120: TAG_APPLE_property 1234 AT_name ( "p2" ) 1235 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1236 1237 0x00000130: TAG_member [8] 1238 AT_name( "_p1" ) 1239 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" ) 1240 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1241 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1242 1243 0x00000140: TAG_member [8] 1244 AT_name( "n2" ) 1245 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" ) 1246 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1247 1248 0x00000150: AT_type( ( int ) ) 1249 1250Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an 1251auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives 1252with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example. But we actually 1253don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar 1254directly. 1255 1256Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in 1257the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in 1258the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation. In that case, 1259the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the 1260current translation unit. 1261 1262Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using 1263``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``. 1264 1265.. code-block:: objc 1266 1267 @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr; 1268 1269.. code-block:: none 1270 1271 TAG_APPLE_property [8] 1272 AT_name( "pr" ) 1273 AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) ) 1274 AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic) 1275 1276The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using 1277``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes. 1278 1279.. code-block:: objc 1280 1281 @interface I1 1282 @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3; 1283 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a; 1284 @end 1285 1286 @implementation I1 1287 @synthesize p3; 1288 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ } 1289 @end 1290 1291The DWARF for this would be: 1292 1293.. code-block:: none 1294 1295 0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1296 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1297 AT_name( "I1" ) 1298 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1299 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1300 1301 0x000003cd TAG_APPLE_property 1302 AT_name ( "p3" ) 1303 AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" ) 1304 AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1305 1306 0x000003f3: TAG_member [8] 1307 AT_name( "_p3" ) 1308 AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1309 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} ) 1310 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1311 1312New DWARF Tags 1313^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1314 1315+-----------------------+--------+ 1316| TAG | Value | 1317+=======================+========+ 1318| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 | 1319+-----------------------+--------+ 1320 1321New DWARF Attributes 1322^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1323 1324+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1325| Attribute | Value | Classes | 1326+================================+========+===========+ 1327| DW_AT_APPLE_property | 0x3fed | Reference | 1328+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1329| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter | 0x3fe9 | String | 1330+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1331| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter | 0x3fea | String | 1332+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1333| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant | 1334+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1335 1336New DWARF Constants 1337^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1338 1339+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1340| Name | Value | 1341+======================================+=======+ 1342| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly | 0x01 | 1343+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1344| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter | 0x02 | 1345+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1346| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign | 0x04 | 1347+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1348| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite | 0x08 | 1349+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1350| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain | 0x10 | 1351+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1352| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy | 0x20 | 1353+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1354| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic | 0x40 | 1355+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1356| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter | 0x80 | 1357+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1358| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic | 0x100 | 1359+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1360| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak | 0x200 | 1361+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1362| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong | 0x400 | 1363+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1364| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained | 0x800 | 1365+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1366| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability | 0x1000| 1367+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1368| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable | 0x2000| 1369+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1370| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class | 0x4000| 1371+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1372 1373Name Accelerator Tables 1374----------------------- 1375 1376Introduction 1377^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1378 1379The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a 1380debugger needs. The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries 1381in the table are publicly visible names only. This means no static or hidden 1382functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``". No static variables or private 1383class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``". Many compilers add different 1384things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or 1385clang. 1386 1387The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of 1388these tables. For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name 1389of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union, 1390the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name 1391given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information 1392entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member." 1393So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully 1394qualified name. Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as 1395"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or 1396"``a::b::c``". So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in 1397order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered 1398into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to 1399use. 1400 1401All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of 1402its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of 1403space in the object file. These tables, when they are written to disk, are not 1404sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting. 1405These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table 1406itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially 1407for large C++ programs. 1408 1409Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this 1410table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we 1411won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables. 1412At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we 1413need. 1414 1415These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs. LLDB 1416uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH. LLDB is then 1417often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in 1418namespace "``baz``". Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes 1419tables. Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression, 1420we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot. Having new 1421accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this 1422type of debugging experience greatly. 1423 1424We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory 1425from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing. We would also 1426be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain 1427exactly what we need. The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these 1428issues. In order to solve these issues we need to: 1429 1430* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is 1431* Lookups should be very fast 1432* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers 1433* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box 1434* Strict rules for the contents of tables 1435 1436Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse 1437of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not 1438duplicated. We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by 1439simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing. 1440 1441The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that 1442debuggers tend to do. Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the 1443mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find 1444the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches. In the 1445case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time. 1446 1447Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the 1448accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content. 1449 1450Hash Tables 1451^^^^^^^^^^^ 1452 1453Standard Hash Tables 1454"""""""""""""""""""" 1455 1456Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the 1457bucket contents: 1458 1459.. code-block:: none 1460 1461 .------------. 1462 | HEADER | 1463 |------------| 1464 | BUCKETS | 1465 |------------| 1466 | DATA | 1467 `------------' 1468 1469The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash: 1470 1471.. code-block:: none 1472 1473 .------------. 1474 | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0] 1475 | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1] 1476 | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2] 1477 | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3] 1478 | | ... 1479 | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1480 '------------' 1481 1482So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table 14830x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket. Each bucket must 1484contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data 1485for the current string value. 1486 1487.. code-block:: none 1488 1489 .------------. 1490 0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer 1491 | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash 1492 | "erase" | string value 1493 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1494 |------------| 1495 0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer 1496 | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash 1497 | "dump" | string value 1498 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1499 |------------| 1500 0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer 1501 | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash 1502 | "main" | string value 1503 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1504 `------------' 1505 1506The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the 1507negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present. So 1508if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit 1509hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``. We would need to go to 1510the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches. To 1511do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and 1512skip to the next bucket. Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and 1513touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash. All of 1514these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match. 1515 1516Name Hash Tables 1517"""""""""""""""" 1518 1519To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit 1520differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values, 1521followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then 1522the data for all hash values: 1523 1524.. code-block:: none 1525 1526 .-------------. 1527 | HEADER | 1528 |-------------| 1529 | BUCKETS | 1530 |-------------| 1531 | HASHES | 1532 |-------------| 1533 | OFFSETS | 1534 |-------------| 1535 | DATA | 1536 `-------------' 1537 1538The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array. By 1539making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow 1540ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as 1541possible. Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup 1542goes. If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions. So for a 1543table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash 1544values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and 1545``OFFSETS`` as: 1546 1547.. code-block:: none 1548 1549 .-------------------------. 1550 | HEADER.magic | uint32_t 1551 | HEADER.version | uint16_t 1552 | HEADER.hash_function | uint16_t 1553 | HEADER.bucket_count | uint32_t 1554 | HEADER.hashes_count | uint32_t 1555 | HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t 1556 | HEADER_DATA | HeaderData 1557 |-------------------------| 1558 | BUCKETS | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes 1559 |-------------------------| 1560 | HASHES | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values 1561 |-------------------------| 1562 | OFFSETS | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data 1563 |-------------------------| 1564 | ALL HASH DATA | 1565 `-------------------------' 1566 1567So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up 1568with: 1569 1570.. code-block:: none 1571 1572 .------------. 1573 | HEADER | 1574 |------------| 1575 | 0 | BUCKETS[0] 1576 | 2 | BUCKETS[1] 1577 | 5 | BUCKETS[2] 1578 | 6 | BUCKETS[3] 1579 | | ... 1580 | ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1581 |------------| 1582 | 0x........ | HASHES[0] 1583 | 0x........ | HASHES[1] 1584 | 0x........ | HASHES[2] 1585 | 0x........ | HASHES[3] 1586 | 0x........ | HASHES[4] 1587 | 0x........ | HASHES[5] 1588 | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1589 | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1590 | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1591 | 0x........ | HASHES[9] 1592 | 0x........ | HASHES[10] 1593 | 0x........ | HASHES[11] 1594 | 0x........ | HASHES[12] 1595 | 0x........ | HASHES[13] 1596 | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes] 1597 |------------| 1598 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0] 1599 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1] 1600 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2] 1601 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3] 1602 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4] 1603 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5] 1604 | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1605 | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1606 | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1607 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9] 1608 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10] 1609 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11] 1610 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12] 1611 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13] 1612 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes] 1613 |------------| 1614 | | 1615 | | 1616 | | 1617 | | 1618 | | 1619 |------------| 1620 0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase") 1621 | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase" 1622 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1623 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1624 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1625 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1626 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1627 |------------| 1628 0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision") 1629 | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision" 1630 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1631 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1632 | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump") 1633 | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump" 1634 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1635 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1636 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1637 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1638 |------------| 1639 0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main") 1640 | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main" 1641 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1642 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1643 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1644 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1645 | 0x........ | HashData[4] 1646 | 0x........ | HashData[5] 1647 | 0x........ | HashData[6] 1648 | 0x........ | HashData[7] 1649 | 0x........ | HashData[8] 1650 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1651 `------------' 1652 1653So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for 1654debugger lookup. If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we 1655would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit 1656hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``. ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which 1657is the index into the ``HASHES`` table. We would then compare any consecutive 165832 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in 1659``BUCKETS[3]``. We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo 1660``n_buckets`` is still 3. In the case of a failed lookup we would access the 1661memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes 1662before we know that we have no match. We don't end up marching through 1663multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache 1664lines being accessed as small as possible. 1665 1666The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J. 1667Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections. It is a 1668very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash 1669collisions. 1670 1671Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``. 1672 1673Details 1674^^^^^^^ 1675 1676These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the 1677table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"), 1678how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each 1679hash value. 1680 1681Header Layout 1682""""""""""""" 1683 1684The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part. The exact format of the 1685header is: 1686 1687.. code-block:: c 1688 1689 struct Header 1690 { 1691 uint32_t magic; // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection 1692 uint16_t version; // Version number 1693 uint16_t hash_function; // The hash function enumeration that was used 1694 uint32_t bucket_count; // The number of buckets in this hash table 1695 uint32_t hashes_count; // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table 1696 uint32_t header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment 1697 // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not 1698 // include the size of the preceding fields 1699 HeaderData header_data; // Implementation specific header data 1700 }; 1701 1702The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'`` 1703encoded as an ASCII integer. This allows the detection of the start of the 1704hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table 1705can be correctly extracted. The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit 1706``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the 1707future. The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t`` 1708enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table. 1709The current values for the hash function enumerations include: 1710 1711.. code-block:: c 1712 1713 enum HashFunctionType 1714 { 1715 eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function 1716 }; 1717 1718``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets 1719are in the ``BUCKETS`` array. ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit 1720hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets 1721are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array. ``header_data_len`` specifies the size 1722in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of 1723this table. 1724 1725Fixed Lookup 1726"""""""""""" 1727 1728The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data. 1729 1730.. code-block:: c 1731 1732 struct FixedTable 1733 { 1734 uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count]; // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below 1735 uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count]; // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table 1736 uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count]; // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above 1737 }; 1738 1739``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array. The 1740``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the 1741hash table. Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets`` 1742array that points to the data for the hash value. 1743 1744This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain 1745different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables. 1746This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in 1747later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing. 1748 1749DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot 1750of information for each name. We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and 1751able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features 1752that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store 1753for each name. 1754 1755The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk. 1756We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs) 1757for each name. To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or 1758Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name. First comes the type of 1759the data in each atom: 1760 1761.. code-block:: c 1762 1763 enum AtomType 1764 { 1765 eAtomTypeNULL = 0u, 1766 eAtomTypeDIEOffset = 1u, // DIE offset, check form for encoding 1767 eAtomTypeCUOffset = 2u, // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question 1768 eAtomTypeTag = 3u, // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2 1769 eAtomTypeNameFlags = 4u, // Flags from enum NameFlags 1770 eAtomTypeTypeFlags = 5u, // Flags from enum TypeFlags 1771 }; 1772 1773The enumeration values and their meanings are: 1774 1775.. code-block:: none 1776 1777 eAtomTypeNULL - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list 1778 eAtomTypeDIEOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name 1779 eAtomTypeCUOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE 1780 eAtomTypeDIETag - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is 1781 eAtomTypeNameFlags - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...) 1782 eAtomTypeTypeFlags - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...) 1783 1784Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each 1785atom type data is encoded: 1786 1787.. code-block:: c 1788 1789 struct Atom 1790 { 1791 uint16_t type; // AtomType enum value 1792 uint16_t form; // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines 1793 }; 1794 1795The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact 1796encoding of the data for the Atom type. See the DWARF specification for the 1797``DW_FORM_`` definitions. 1798 1799.. code-block:: c 1800 1801 struct HeaderData 1802 { 1803 uint32_t die_offset_base; 1804 uint32_t atom_count; 1805 Atoms atoms[atom_count0]; 1806 }; 1807 1808``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms 1809that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``, 1810``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``. It also defines 1811what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large 1812each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data 1813should be interpreted. 1814 1815For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions + 1816globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and 1817the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom`` 1818array to be: 1819 1820.. code-block:: c 1821 1822 HeaderData.atom_count = 1; 1823 HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset; 1824 HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4; 1825 1826This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is 1827encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4). This allows a single name to have 1828multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined 1829function for instance. Future tables could include more information about the 1830DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block, 1831or inlined. 1832 1833The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the 1834".debug_str" table. The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which 1835may already contain copies of all of the strings. This helps make sure, with 1836help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF 1837sections and keeps the hash table size down. Another benefit to having the 1838compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that 1839DWARF parsing can be made much faster. 1840 1841After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data. The hash data 1842needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data 1843at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple: 1844 1845.. code-block:: c 1846 1847 uint32_t str_offset 1848 uint32_t hash_data_count 1849 HashData[hash_data_count] 1850 1851If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the 1852hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision): 1853 1854.. code-block:: none 1855 1856 .------------. 1857 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1858 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1859 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1860 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1861 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1862 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1863 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1864 `------------' 1865 1866If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets: 1867 1868.. code-block:: none 1869 1870 .------------. 1871 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1872 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1873 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1874 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1875 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1876 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1877 | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print") 1878 | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count 1879 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1880 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1881 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1882 `------------' 1883 1884Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1 188532 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries. 1886 1887Contents 1888^^^^^^^^ 1889 1890As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the 1891different tables. For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``", 1892"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``". 1893 1894"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1895``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or 1896``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``, 1897``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``. It also contains 1898``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and 1899static variables). All global and static variables should be included, 1900including those scoped within functions and classes. For example using the 1901following code: 1902 1903.. code-block:: c 1904 1905 static int var = 0; 1906 1907 void f () 1908 { 1909 static int var = 0; 1910 } 1911 1912Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table. All 1913functions should emit both their full names and their basenames. For C or C++, 1914the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the 1915``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the 1916function basename. If global or static variables have a mangled name in a 1917``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the 1918simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute. 1919 1920"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1921tag is one of: 1922 1923* DW_TAG_array_type 1924* DW_TAG_class_type 1925* DW_TAG_enumeration_type 1926* DW_TAG_pointer_type 1927* DW_TAG_reference_type 1928* DW_TAG_string_type 1929* DW_TAG_structure_type 1930* DW_TAG_subroutine_type 1931* DW_TAG_typedef 1932* DW_TAG_union_type 1933* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type 1934* DW_TAG_set_type 1935* DW_TAG_subrange_type 1936* DW_TAG_base_type 1937* DW_TAG_const_type 1938* DW_TAG_immutable_type 1939* DW_TAG_file_type 1940* DW_TAG_namelist 1941* DW_TAG_packed_type 1942* DW_TAG_volatile_type 1943* DW_TAG_restrict_type 1944* DW_TAG_atomic_type 1945* DW_TAG_interface_type 1946* DW_TAG_unspecified_type 1947* DW_TAG_shared_type 1948 1949Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must 1950not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero 1951value). For example, using the following code: 1952 1953.. code-block:: c 1954 1955 int main () 1956 { 1957 int *b = 0; 1958 return *b; 1959 } 1960 1961We get a few type DIEs: 1962 1963.. code-block:: none 1964 1965 0x00000067: TAG_base_type [5] 1966 AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed ) 1967 AT_name( "int" ) 1968 AT_byte_size( 0x04 ) 1969 1970 0x0000006e: TAG_pointer_type [6] 1971 AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) ) 1972 AT_byte_size( 0x08 ) 1973 1974The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``. 1975 1976"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs. 1977If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and 1978the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes). 1979Why? This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the 1980standard C++ library that demangles mangled names. 1981 1982 1983Language Extensions and File Format Changes 1984^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1985 1986Objective-C Extensions 1987"""""""""""""""""""""" 1988 1989"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an 1990Objective-C class. The name used in the hash table is the name of the 1991Objective-C class itself. If the Objective-C class has a category, then an 1992entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class 1993name with the category. So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of 1994method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add 1995an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for 1996"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234. This allows us to quickly 1997track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing 1998expressions. It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where 1999anyone can add methods to a class. The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also 2000emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually 2001contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more 2002compile units. Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries. 2003So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions 2004given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class 2005functions for a class + category name. This table does not contain any 2006selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names + 2007category) to all of the methods and class functions. The selectors are added 2008as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section. 2009 2010In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is 2011the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString 2012stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only 2013("``stringWithCString:``"). 2014 2015Mach-O Changes 2016"""""""""""""" 2017 2018The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files. For 2019mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with 2020names as follows: 2021 2022* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``" 2023* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``" 2024* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit) 2025* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``" 2026 2027.. _codeview: 2028 2029CodeView Debug Info Format 2030========================== 2031 2032LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this 2033section describes the design and implementation of that support. 2034 2035Format Background 2036----------------- 2037 2038CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the 2039majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the 2040overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information 2041from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently 2042merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is 2043generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a 204416-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind. 2045 2046Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object 2047file. All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and 2048inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be 2049one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to 2050it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation, 2051the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing 2052to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object 2053file ``.debug$S`` sections. 2054 2055Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in 2056the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such 2057as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented 2058using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to 2059CodeView consumers and do not require type records. 2060 2061Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type 2062index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While 2063the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a 2064linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always 2065referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only 2066"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete, 2067non-forward-declaration type records. 2068 2069Working with CodeView 2070--------------------- 2071 2072These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve 2073LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper 2074embedded in ``llvm-readobj``. 2075 2076* Testing MSVC's output:: 2077 2078 $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file 2079 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj 2080 2081* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang:: 2082 2083 $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm 2084 2085 Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases. 2086 2087* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata:: 2088 2089 $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj 2090 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt 2091 2092 Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj 2093 2094Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type 2095records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records, 2096dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records 2097in LLVM's backend. 2098