History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp (Results 301 – 325 of 1334)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 1b4d2491 27-Jul-2020 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[NFC] Replace ".size() < 1" with ".empty()"


# d9bbe859 27-Jul-2020 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment][NFC] Update Bitcodewriter to use Align

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83533


# ac375c2f 23-Jul-2020 Steven Wu <stevenwu@apple.com>

[Bitcode] Avoid duplicating linker option when upgrading

Summary:
The upgrading path from old ModuleFlag based linker options to the new
NamedMetadata based linker option in in materializeMetadata()

[Bitcode] Avoid duplicating linker option when upgrading

Summary:
The upgrading path from old ModuleFlag based linker options to the new
NamedMetadata based linker option in in materializeMetadata() which gets
called once for the module and once for every GV. The linker options are
getting dup'ed every time and it can create massive amount of the linker
options in the object file that gets created from old bitcode. Fix the
problem by checking if the new option exists or not before upgrade
again.

rdar://64543389

Reviewers: pcc, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman

Reviewed By: arphaman

Subscribers: hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83688

show more ...


# 78709345 23-Jul-2020 Steven Wu <stevenwu@apple.com>

[Bitcode] Drop invalid branch_weight in BitcodeReader

Summary:
If bitcode reader gets an invalid branch weight, drop that from the
inputs. This allows us to read the broken modules we generated befo

[Bitcode] Drop invalid branch_weight in BitcodeReader

Summary:
If bitcode reader gets an invalid branch weight, drop that from the
inputs. This allows us to read the broken modules we generated before
the verifier was able to catch this.

rdar://64870641

Reviewers: yrouban, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman, aprantl

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83699

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# 5e999cbe 05-Jun-2020 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

IR: Define byref parameter attribute

This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a
function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version
of byval to remove some

IR: Define byref parameter attribute

This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a
function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version
of byval to remove some of the stack-copy implications in its
definition.

This includes the base IR changes, and some tests for places where it
should be treated similarly to byval. Codegen support will be in a
future patch.

My original attempt at solving some of these problems was to repurpose
byval with a different address space from the stack. However, it is
technically permitted for the callee to introduce a write to the
argument, although nothing does this in reality. There is also talk of
removing and replacing the byval attribute, so a new attribute would
need to take its place anyway.

This is intended avoid some optimization issues with the current
handling of aggregate arguments, as well as fixes inflexibilty in how
frontends can specify the kernel ABI. The most honest representation
of the amdgpu_kernel convention is to expose all kernel arguments as
loads from constant memory. Today, these are raw, SSA Argument values
and codegen is responsible for turning these into loads.

Background:

There currently isn't a satisfactory way to represent how arguments
for the amdgpu_kernel calling convention are passed. In reality,
arguments are passed in a single, flat, constant memory buffer
implicitly passed to the function. It is also illegal to call this
function in the IR, and this is only ever invoked by a driver of some
kind.

It does not make sense to have a stack passed parameter in this
context as is implied by byval. It is never valid to write to the
kernel arguments, as this would corrupt the inputs seen by other
dispatches of the kernel. These argumets are also not in the same
address space as the stack, so a copy is needed to an alloca. From a
source C-like language, the kernel parameters are invisible.
Semantically, a copy is always required from the constant argument
memory to a mutable variable.

The current clang calling convention lowering emits raw values,
including aggregates into the function argument list, since using
byval would not make sense. This has some unfortunate consequences for
the optimizer. In the aggregate case, we end up with an aggregate
store to alloca, which both SROA and instcombine turn into a store of
each aggregate field. The optimizer never pieces this back together to
see that this is really just a copy from constant memory, so we end up
stuck with expensive stack usage.

This also means the backend dictates the alignment of arguments, and
arbitrarily picks the LLVM IR ABI type alignment. By allowing an
explicit alignment, frontends can make better decisions. For example,
there's real no advantage to an aligment higher than 4, so a frontend
could choose to compact the argument layout. Similarly, there is a
high penalty to using an alignment lower than 4, so a frontend could
opt into more padding for small arguments.

Another design consideration is when it is appropriate to expose the
fact that these arguments are all really passed in adjacent
memory. Currently we have a late IR optimization pass in codegen to
rewrite the kernel argument values into explicit loads to enable
vectorization. In most programs, unrelated argument loads can be
merged together. However, exposing this property directly from the
frontend has some disadvantages. We still need a way to track the
original argument sizes and alignments to report to the driver. I find
using some side-channel, metadata mechanism to track this
unappealing. If the kernel arguments were exposed as a single buffer
to begin with, alias analysis would be unaware that the padding bits
betewen arguments are meaningless. Another family of problems is there
are still some gaps in replacing all of the available parameter
attributes with metadata equivalents once lowered to loads.

The immediate plan is to start using this new attribute to handle all
aggregate argumets for kernels. Long term, it makes sense to migrate
all kernel arguments, including scalars, to be passed indirectly in
the same manner.

Additional context is in D79744.

show more ...


# cc28058c 10-Jul-2020 Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>

Temporarily revert "[NFC] Separate bitcode reading for FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG(_OLD)"
as it wasn't NFC and is causing issues with thinlto bitcode reading.

I've followed up offline with reproduction i

Temporarily revert "[NFC] Separate bitcode reading for FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG(_OLD)"
as it wasn't NFC and is causing issues with thinlto bitcode reading.

I've followed up offline with reproduction instructions and testcases.

This reverts commit 30582457b47004dec8a78144abc919a13ccbd08c.

show more ...


# 30582457 10-Jul-2020 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[NFC] Separate bitcode reading for FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG(_OLD)

This is preparatory work to unable storing alignment for AtomicCmpXchgInst.
See D83136 for context and bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show

[NFC] Separate bitcode reading for FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG(_OLD)

This is preparatory work to unable storing alignment for AtomicCmpXchgInst.
See D83136 for context and bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27168

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83375

show more ...


# ff7900d5 08-Jul-2020 Gui Andrade <guiand@google.com>

[LLVM] Accept `noundef` attribute in function definitions/calls

The `noundef` attribute indicates an argument or return value which
may never have an undef value representation.

This patch allows L

[LLVM] Accept `noundef` attribute in function definitions/calls

The `noundef` attribute indicates an argument or return value which
may never have an undef value representation.

This patch allows LLVM to parse the attribute.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83412

show more ...


# 74c72375 07-Jul-2020 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[NFC] Adding the align attribute on Atomic{CmpXchg|RMW}Inst

This is the first step to add support for the align attribute to AtomicRMWInst and AtomicCmpXchgInst.
Next step is to add support in IRBui

[NFC] Adding the align attribute on Atomic{CmpXchg|RMW}Inst

This is the first step to add support for the align attribute to AtomicRMWInst and AtomicCmpXchgInst.
Next step is to add support in IRBuilder and BitcodeReader.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27168

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83136

show more ...


# 0ec712af 20-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles.

The indexing was messed up, so the result was completely broken.

Shuffle constant exprs are rare in practice; without vscale t

[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles.

The indexing was messed up, so the result was completely broken.

Shuffle constant exprs are rare in practice; without vscale types,
constant folding generally elminates them. So sort of hard to trip over.

Fixes regression from D72467.

(Recommitting after fix for memory leak.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80330

show more ...


# 4abf0243 25-Jun-2020 Mehdi Amini <joker.eph@gmail.com>

Remove references to the 4.0 release as a major breaking (NFC)

This is cleaning up comments (mostly in the bitcode handling) about
removing some backward compatibility aspect in the 4.0 release.
His

Remove references to the 4.0 release as a major breaking (NFC)

This is cleaning up comments (mostly in the bitcode handling) about
removing some backward compatibility aspect in the 4.0 release.
Historically, "4.0" was used during the development of the 3.x
versions as "this future major breaking change version". At the time
the major number was used to indicate the compatibility. When we
reached 3.9 we decided to change the numbering, instead of going to
3.10 we went to 4.0 but after changing the meaning of the major
number to not mean anything anymore with respect to bitcode backward
compatibility.

The current policy
(https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility)
indicates only now:

The current LLVM version supports loading any bitcode since version 3.0.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82514

show more ...


# 10045cbe 24-Jun-2020 Mitch Phillips <31459023+hctim@users.noreply.github.com>

Revert "[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles."

Patch has a memory leak bug that broke the ASan buildbots. More info
available at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80330

Th

Revert "[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles."

Patch has a memory leak bug that broke the ASan buildbots. More info
available at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80330

This reverts commit b5740105d270a2d76da8812cafb63e4b799ada73.

show more ...


# b5740105 20-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles.

The indexing was messed up, so the result was completely broken.

Shuffle constant exprs are rare in practice; without vscale t

[BitcodeReader] Fix DelayedShuffle handling for ConstantExpr shuffles.

The indexing was messed up, so the result was completely broken.

Shuffle constant exprs are rare in practice; without vscale types,
constant folding generally elminates them. So sort of hard to trip over.

Fixes regression from D72467.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80330

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# 07f33512 14-May-2020 Kevin P. Neal <kevin.neal@sas.com>

[strictfp] Replace dangling strictfp attrs with nobuiltin

In preparation for a patch that will enforce new rules for the usage of
the strictfp attribute, this patch introduces auto-upgrade behavior

[strictfp] Replace dangling strictfp attrs with nobuiltin

In preparation for a patch that will enforce new rules for the usage of
the strictfp attribute, this patch introduces auto-upgrade behavior that
will replace the strictfp attribute on callsites with nobuiltin if the
enclosing function declaration doesn't also have the strictfp attribute.

This auto-upgrade isn't being performed on .ll files because that would
prevent us from writing a test for the forthcoming verifier behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70096

show more ...


# 4666953c 01-Jun-2020 Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>

[StackSafety] Add info into function summary

Summary:
This patch adds optional field into function summary,
implements asm and bitcode serialization. YAML
serialization is omitted and can be added l

[StackSafety] Add info into function summary

Summary:
This patch adds optional field into function summary,
implements asm and bitcode serialization. YAML
serialization is omitted and can be added later if
needed.

This patch includes this information into summary only
if module contains at least one sanitize_memtag function.
In a near future MTE is the user of the analysis.
Later if needed we can provede more direct control
on when information is included into summary.

Reviewers: eugenis

Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80908

show more ...


# a7fa35a6 21-May-2020 Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi@google.com>

[ThinLTO] Compute the basic block count across modules.

Summary:
Count the per-module number of basic blocks when the module summary is computed
and sum them up during Thin LTO indexing.

This is us

[ThinLTO] Compute the basic block count across modules.

Summary:
Count the per-module number of basic blocks when the module summary is computed
and sum them up during Thin LTO indexing.

This is used to estimate the working set size under the partial sample PGO.

This is split off of D79831.

Reviewers: davidxl, espindola

Subscribers: emaste, inglorion, hiraditya, MaskRay, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80403

show more ...


# c476abfd 21-May-2020 Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>

[BitcodeReader] Simplify code. NFCI.


# 4f04db4b 15-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

AllocaInst should store Align instead of MaybeAlign.

Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
vari

AllocaInst should store Align instead of MaybeAlign.

Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044

show more ...


# 0ec5f501 16-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

Harden IR and bitcode parsers against infinite size types.

If isSized is passed a SmallPtrSet, it uses that set to catch infinitely
recursive types (for example, a struct that has itself as a member

Harden IR and bitcode parsers against infinite size types.

If isSized is passed a SmallPtrSet, it uses that set to catch infinitely
recursive types (for example, a struct that has itself as a member).
Otherwise, it just crashes on such types.

show more ...


# 11aa3707 14-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

StoreInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign

This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.

Differentia

StoreInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign

This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968

show more ...


# f89f7da9 25-Apr-2020 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>

[IR] Convert null-pointer-is-valid into an enum attribute

The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it fro

[IR] Convert null-pointer-is-valid into an enum attribute

The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it from a string into an enum attribute.

In the future, this attribute may be replaced with data layout
properties.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78862

show more ...


# 8c24f331 31-Mar-2020 Ties Stuij <ties.stuij@arm.com>

[IR][BFloat] Add BFloat IR type

Summary:
The BFloat IR type is introduced to provide support for, initially, the BFloat16
datatype introduced with the Armv8.6 architecture (optional from Armv8.2
onw

[IR][BFloat] Add BFloat IR type

Summary:
The BFloat IR type is introduced to provide support for, initially, the BFloat16
datatype introduced with the Armv8.6 architecture (optional from Armv8.2
onwards). It has an 8-bit exponent and a 7-bit mantissa and behaves like an IEEE
754 floating point IR type.

This is part of a patch series upstreaming Armv8.6 features. Subsequent patches
will upstream intrinsics support and C-lang support for BFloat.

Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, rjmccall, rsmith, liutianle, RKSimon, craig.topper, jfb, LukeGeeson, sdesmalen, deadalnix, ctetreau

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, danielkiss, arphaman, kristof.beyls, dexonsmith

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78190

show more ...


# 4532a508 14-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing.

For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the I

Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing.

For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.

The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.

Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.

This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.

Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403

show more ...


# 44ecaabc 13-May-2020 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

[BitcodeReader] datalayout must be specified before it is queried.

This isn't really a new invariant; it effectively already existed due to
existing DataLayout queries. But this makes it explicit.

[BitcodeReader] datalayout must be specified before it is queried.

This isn't really a new invariant; it effectively already existed due to
existing DataLayout queries. But this makes it explicit.

This is technically not backward-compatible with the existing bitcode
reader, but it's backward-compatible with the output of the bitcode
writer, which is what matters in practice.

No testcase because I don't know a good way to write one: there are no
existing tools that can generate a bitcode file that would trigger the
error.

Split off from D78403.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79900

show more ...


# cb22ab74 12-May-2020 Zequan Wu <zequanwu@google.com>

Add nomerge function attribute to supress tail merge optimization in simplifyCFG

We want to add a way to avoid merging identical calls so as to keep the
separate debug-information for those calls. T

Add nomerge function attribute to supress tail merge optimization in simplifyCFG

We want to add a way to avoid merging identical calls so as to keep the
separate debug-information for those calls. There is also an asan
usecase where having this attribute would be beneficial to avoid
alternative work-arounds.

Here is the link to the feature request:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42783.

`nomerge` is different from `noline`. `noinline` prevents function from
inlining at callsites, but `nomerge` prevents multiple identical calls
from being merged into one.

This patch adds `nomerge` to disable the optimization in IR level. A
followup patch will be needed to let backend understands `nomerge` and
avoid tail merge at backend.

Reviewed By: asbirlea, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78659

show more ...


1...<<11121314151617181920>>...54