#
e5e0d873 |
| 26-Jun-2024 |
Timm Bäder <tbaeder@redhat.com> |
[clang][Interp] Implement CXXStdInitializerListExprs
|
#
482c41e9 |
| 20-Jun-2024 |
Mital Ashok <mital@mitalashok.co.uk> |
[Clang] [Sema] Diagnose unknown std::initializer_list layout in SemaInit (#95580)
This checks if the layout of `std::initializer_list` is something Clang
can handle much earlier and deduplicates th
[Clang] [Sema] Diagnose unknown std::initializer_list layout in SemaInit (#95580)
This checks if the layout of `std::initializer_list` is something Clang
can handle much earlier and deduplicates the checks in
CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp and AST/ExprConstant.cpp
Also now diagnose `union initializer_list` (Fixes #95495), bit-field for
the size (Fixes a crash that would happen during codegen if it were
unnamed), base classes (that wouldn't be initialized) and polymorphic
classes (whose vtable pointer wouldn't be initialized).
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5 |
|
#
989f76ce |
| 25-May-2022 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general well beha
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general well behaved mechanism in Clang to unify the type sugar of multiple deductions of the same type parameter.
So we ended up making an arbitrary choice: keep the sugar of the first deduction, ignore subsequent ones.
In general, we already had this problem, but in a smaller scale. The result of the conditional operator and many other binary ops could benefit from such a mechanism.
This patch implements such a type sugar unification mechanism.
The basics:
This patch introduces a `getCommonSugaredType(QualType X, QualType Y)` method to ASTContext which implements this functionality, and uses it for unifying the results of type deduction and return type deduction. This will return the most derived type sugar which occurs in both X and Y.
Example:
Suppose we have these types: ``` using Animal = int; using Cat = Animal; using Dog = Animal;
using Tom = Cat; using Spike = Dog; using Tyke = Dog; ``` For `X = Tom, Y = Spike`, this will result in `Animal`. For `X = Spike, Y = Tyke`, this will result in `Dog`.
How it works:
We take two types, X and Y, which we wish to unify as input. These types must have the same (qualified or unqualified) canonical type.
We dive down fast through top-level type sugar nodes, to the underlying canonical node. If these canonical nodes differ, we build a common one out of the two, unifying any sugar they had. Note that this might involve a recursive call to unify any children of those. We then return that canonical node, handling any qualifiers.
If they don't differ, we walk up the list of sugar type nodes we dived through, finding the last identical pair, and returning that as the result, again handling qualifiers.
Note that this patch will not unify sugar nodes if they are not identical already. We will simply strip off top-level sugar nodes that differ between X and Y. This sugar node unification will instead be implemented in a subsequent patch.
This patch also implements a few users of this mechanism: * Template argument deduction. * Auto deduction, for functions returning auto / decltype(auto), with special handling for initializer_list as well.
Further users will be implemented in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283
show more ...
|
#
637da9de |
| 13-Sep-2022 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
Revert "[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar"
This reverts commit d200db38637884fd0b421802c6094b2a03ceb29e, which causes a clang crash. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283#3785755
Revert "[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar"
This reverts commit d200db38637884fd0b421802c6094b2a03ceb29e, which causes a clang crash. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283#3785755
Test case for convenience: ``` template <typename T> using P = int T::*;
template <typename T, typename... A> void j(P<T>, T, A...);
template <typename T> void j(P<T>, T);
struct S { int b; }; void g(P<S> k, S s) { j(k, s); } ```
show more ...
|
#
d200db38 |
| 25-May-2022 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general well beha
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general well behaved mechanism in Clang to unify the type sugar of multiple deductions of the same type parameter.
So we ended up making an arbitrary choice: keep the sugar of the first deduction, ignore subsequent ones.
In general, we already had this problem, but in a smaller scale. The result of the conditional operator and many other binary ops could benefit from such a mechanism.
This patch implements such a type sugar unification mechanism.
The basics:
This patch introduces a `getCommonSugaredType(QualType X, QualType Y)` method to ASTContext which implements this functionality, and uses it for unifying the results of type deduction and return type deduction. This will return the most derived type sugar which occurs in both X and Y.
Example:
Suppose we have these types: ``` using Animal = int; using Cat = Animal; using Dog = Animal;
using Tom = Cat; using Spike = Dog; using Tyke = Dog; ``` For `X = Tom, Y = Spike`, this will result in `Animal`. For `X = Spike, Y = Tyke`, this will result in `Dog`.
How it works:
We take two types, X and Y, which we wish to unify as input. These types must have the same (qualified or unqualified) canonical type.
We dive down fast through top-level type sugar nodes, to the underlying canonical node. If these canonical nodes differ, we build a common one out of the two, unifying any sugar they had. Note that this might involve a recursive call to unify any children of those. We then return that canonical node, handling any qualifiers.
If they don't differ, we walk up the list of sugar type nodes we dived through, finding the last identical pair, and returning that as the result, again handling qualifiers.
Note that this patch will not unify sugar nodes if they are not identical already. We will simply strip off top-level sugar nodes that differ between X and Y. This sugar node unification will instead be implemented in a subsequent patch.
This patch also implements a few users of this mechanism: * Template argument deduction. * Auto deduction, for functions returning auto / decltype(auto), with special handling for initializer_list as well.
Further users will be implemented in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
15f3cd6b |
| 11-Oct-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default, print types as written. There are customization options there, but not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a problem where we failed to distinguish between a type that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers, such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::', and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such, the so called canonical types. Example: ``` namespace foo { struct A {}; A a; }; ``` If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have, by default, printed the canonical type of A as well. As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch will make it print it accurately even when written without qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example, if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A, then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if you want to match against the name of a type, and you want the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(), which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new, and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself. This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match. Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar, be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType. The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs. For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
show more ...
|
#
888673b6 |
| 15-Jul-2022 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed wi
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
show more ...
|
#
7c51f02e |
| 11-Oct-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default, print types as written. There are customization options there, but not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a problem where we failed to distinguish between a type that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers, such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::', and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such, the so called canonical types. Example: ``` namespace foo { struct A {}; A a; }; ``` If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have, by default, printed the canonical type of A as well. As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch will make it print it accurately even when written without qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example, if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A, then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if you want to match against the name of a type, and you want the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(), which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new, and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself. This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match. Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar, be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType. The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs. For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
show more ...
|
#
3968936b |
| 13-Jul-2022 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.
import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
show more ...
|
#
bdc6974f |
| 11-Oct-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer handling.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
2177e455 |
| 30-Oct-2020 |
Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk> |
PR47861: Expand dangling reference warning to look through copy construction, and to assume that assignment operators return *this.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
57acbaec |
| 15-Apr-2020 |
Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk> |
Improve diagnostic when constant-evaluating a std::initializer_list with an unexpected form.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
08275417 |
| 31-Aug-2019 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
[c++20] Disallow template argument deduction from a braced-init-list containing designators. The C++20 wording doesn't actually say what happens in this case, but treating this as a non-deduced conte
[c++20] Disallow template argument deduction from a braced-init-list containing designators. The C++20 wording doesn't actually say what happens in this case, but treating this as a non-deduced context seems like the most natural behavior.
(We might want to consider deducing through array designators as an extension in the future, but will need to be careful to deduce the array bound properly if we do so. That's not permitted herein.)
llvm-svn: 370555
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
1147f71f |
| 01-Feb-2019 |
Eric Fiselier <eric@efcs.ca> |
Improve diagnostic to tell you a type is incomplete.
I recently ran into this code: ``` \#include <iostream> void foo(const std::string &s, const std::string& = ""); \#include <string> void test() {
Improve diagnostic to tell you a type is incomplete.
I recently ran into this code: ``` \#include <iostream> void foo(const std::string &s, const std::string& = ""); \#include <string> void test() { foo(""); } ```
The diagnostic produced said it can't bind char[1] to std::string const&. It didn't mention std::string is incomplete. The user had to infer that.
This patch causes the diagnostic to now say "incomplete type".
llvm-svn: 352927
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
afe48f9d |
| 23-Jul-2018 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Fold -Wreturn-stack-address into general initialization lifetime checking.
llvm-svn: 337743
|
#
d87aab93 |
| 17-Jul-2018 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension.
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The s
Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension.
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the program is ill-formed.
This reinstates r337226, reverted in r337255, with a fix for the InitializedEntity alignment problem that was breaking ARM buildbots.
llvm-svn: 337329
show more ...
|
#
0aa117dd |
| 17-Jul-2018 |
Florian Hahn <florian.hahn@arm.com> |
Temporarily revert r337226 "Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension."
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only 4 byte aligned and do not h
Temporarily revert r337226 "Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension."
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only 4 byte aligned and do not have 3 bits to store values. A possible solution would be to change the fields in clang::InitializedEntity to enforce a bigger alignment requirement.
The error message is
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:132:3: error: static_assert failed "PointerIntPair with integer size too large for pointer" static_assert(IntBits <= PtrTraits::NumLowBitsAvailable, include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:73:13: note: in instantiation of template class 'llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> >' requested here Value = Info::updateInt(Info::updatePointer(0, PtrVal), llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:51:5: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::setPointerAndInt' requested here setPointerAndInt(PtrVal, IntVal); ^ llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:6237:12: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::PointerIntPair' requested here return {Entity, LK_Extended};
Full log here: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel/builds/1330 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/1394
llvm-svn: 337255
show more ...
|
#
0a9969b3 |
| 17-Jul-2018 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension.
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The s
Restructure checking for, and warning on, lifetime extension.
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the program is ill-formed.
llvm-svn: 337226
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
00c9dfdf |
| 11-Dec-2017 |
Zhihao Yuan <zy@miator.net> |
P0620 follow-up: deducing `auto` from braced-init-list in new expr
Summary: This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)
P0620 follow-up: deducing `auto` from braced-init-list in new expr
Summary: This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)`) to be usable in a `new` expression with a single-clause //braced-init-list// as its initializer (8.3.4 [expr.new]/2). N3922 defined its semantics.
References: http://wg21.link/p0620r0 http://wg21.link/n3922
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39451
llvm-svn: 320401
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5 |
|
#
b1efc9b4 |
| 30-Aug-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Give a better error if auto deduction fails due to inconsistent element types in a braced initializer list.
llvm-svn: 312085
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
c8a32e5e |
| 05-Jan-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Fix bug where types other than 'cv auto', 'cv auto &', and 'cv auto &&' could incorrectly be deduced from an initializer list in pathological cases.
llvm-svn: 291191
|
#
c92d206c |
| 05-Jan-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Add missing "original call argument has same type as deduced parameter type" check for deductions from elements of a braced-init-list.
llvm-svn: 291190
|
#
363ae815 |
| 04-Jan-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Fix failure to treat overloaded function in braced-init-list as a non-deduced context.
Previously, if an overloaded function in a braced-init-list was encountered in template argument deduction, an
Fix failure to treat overloaded function in braced-init-list as a non-deduced context.
Previously, if an overloaded function in a braced-init-list was encountered in template argument deduction, and the overload set couldn't be resolved to a particular function, we'd immediately produce a deduction failure. That's not correct; this situation is supposed to result in that particular P/A pair being treated as a non-deduced context, and deduction can still succeed if the type can be deduced from elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 291014
show more ...
|
#
1b99a9e1 |
| 04-Jan-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Revert accidentally-committed file.
llvm-svn: 290997
|
#
a7d5ec9a |
| 04-Jan-2017 |
Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> |
Factor out duplicated code and simplify.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 290996
|