[SCEV] Add and use SCEVConstant::getAPInt; NFCI

llvm-svn: 255921

AlignmentFromAssumptions and SLPVectorizer preserves AA and GlobalsAA

GlobalsAA's assumptions that passes do not escape globals not previously
escaped is not violated by AlignmentFromAssumptions and

AlignmentFromAssumptions and SLPVectorizer preserves AA and GlobalsAA

GlobalsAA's assumptions that passes do not escape globals not previously
escaped is not violated by AlignmentFromAssumptions and SLPVectorizer. Marking
them as such allows GlobalsAA to be preserved until GVN in the LTO pipeline.

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-December/092972.html

Patch by Vaivaswatha Nagaraj!

llvm-svn: 255348

show more ...

Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."

This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/

Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."

This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253543

show more ...

Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.

Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

Thes

Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.

Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.

There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.

For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)

For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)

and similarly for memmove and memcpy.

I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.

A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.

In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)

There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.

Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253511

show more ...

[SCEV] Introduce ScalarEvolution::getOne and getZero.

Summary:
It is fairly common to call SE->getConstant(Ty, 0) or
SE->getConstant(Ty, 1); this change makes such uses a little bit
briefer.

I've r

[SCEV] Introduce ScalarEvolution::getOne and getZero.

Summary:
It is fairly common to call SE->getConstant(Ty, 0) or
SE->getConstant(Ty, 1); this change makes such uses a little bit
briefer.

I've refactored the call sites I could find easily to use getZero /
getOne.

Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, reames

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12947

llvm-svn: 248362

show more ...

[PM] Port ScalarEvolution to the new pass manager.

This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
objec

[PM] Port ScalarEvolution to the new pass manager.

This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.

I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.

But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.

To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.

To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.

With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063

llvm-svn: 245193

show more ...

Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)

Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390

Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC

The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-c

Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC

The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137

show more ...

Use 'override/final' instead of 'virtual' for overridden methods

The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.

This command was used:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/r

Use 'override/final' instead of 'virtual' for overridden methods

The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.

This command was used:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format

http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925

llvm-svn: 234679

show more ...

Re-sort includes with sort-includes.py and insert raw_ostream.h where it's used.

llvm-svn: 232998

DataLayout is mandatory, update the API to reflect it with references.

Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first at

DataLayout is mandatory, update the API to reflect it with references.

Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.

This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.

I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.

I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.

Test Plan:

Reviewers: echristo

Subscribers: llvm-commits

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231740

show more ...

Remove the remaining uses of abs64 and nuke it.

std::abs works just fine and we're already using it in many places. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 231696

Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module

Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.

As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no

Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module

Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.

As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().

Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module

The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.

Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module

Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.

Reviewers: echristo

Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270

show more ...

[PM] Split the LoopInfo object apart from the legacy pass, creating
a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager.

This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves t

[PM] Split the LoopInfo object apart from the legacy pass, creating
a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager.

This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves the way to port
LoopInfo to the new pass manager. No functionality change is intended
with this iteration.

llvm-svn: 226373

show more ...

[PM] Split the AssumptionTracker immutable pass into two separate APIs:
a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that
manages those caches.

The motivation for this change

[PM] Split the AssumptionTracker immutable pass into two separate APIs:
a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that
manages those caches.

The motivation for this change is two fold. Immutable analyses are
really hacks around the current pass manager design and don't exist in
the new design. This is usually OK, but it requires that the core logic
of an immutable pass be reasonably partitioned off from the pass logic.
This change does precisely that. As a consequence it also paves the way
for the *many* utility functions that deal in the assumptions to live in
both pass manager worlds by creating an separate non-pass object with
its own independent API that they all rely on. Now, the only bits of the
system that deal with the actual pass mechanics are those that actually
need to deal with the pass mechanics.

Once this separation is made, several simplifications become pretty
obvious in the assumption cache itself. Rather than using a set and
callback value handles, it can just be a vector of weak value handles.
The callers can easily skip the handles that are null, and eventually we
can wrap all of this up behind a filter iterator.

For now, this adds boiler plate to the various passes, but this kind of
boiler plate will end up making it possible to port these passes to the
new pass manager, and so it will end up factored away pretty reasonably.

llvm-svn: 225131

show more ...

[AlignmentFromAssumptions] Don't crash just because the target is 32-bit

We used to crash processing any relevant @llvm.assume on a 32-bit target
(because we'd ask SE to subtract expressions of diff

[AlignmentFromAssumptions] Don't crash just because the target is 32-bit

We used to crash processing any relevant @llvm.assume on a 32-bit target
(because we'd ask SE to subtract expressions of differing types). I've copied
our 'simple.ll' test, but with the data layout from arm-linux-gnueabihf to get
some meaningful test coverage here.

llvm-svn: 217574

show more ...

[AlignmentFromAssumptions] Don't divide by zero for unknown starting alignment

The routine that determines an alignment given some SCEV returns zero if the
answer is unknown. In a case where we coul

[AlignmentFromAssumptions] Don't divide by zero for unknown starting alignment

The routine that determines an alignment given some SCEV returns zero if the
answer is unknown. In a case where we could determine the increment of an
AddRec but not the starting alignment, we would compute the integer modulus by
zero (which is illegal and traps). Prevent this by returning early if either
the start or increment alignment is unknown (zero).

llvm-svn: 217544

show more ...

Add a comment to getNewAlignmentDiff.

llvm-svn: 217350

Add an AlignmentFromAssumptions Pass

This adds a ScalarEvolution-powered transformation that updates load, store and
memory intrinsic pointer alignments based on invariant((a+q) & b == 0)
expression

Add an AlignmentFromAssumptions Pass

This adds a ScalarEvolution-powered transformation that updates load, store and
memory intrinsic pointer alignments based on invariant((a+q) & b == 0)
expressions. Many of the simple cases we can get with ValueTracking, but we
still need something like this for the more complicated cases (such as those
with an offset) that require some algebra. Note that gcc's
__builtin_assume_aligned's optional third argument provides exactly for this
kind of 'misalignment' offset for which this kind of logic is necessary.

The primary motivation is to fixup alignments for vector loads/stores after
vectorization (and unrolling). This pass is added to the optimization pipeline
just after the SLP vectorizer runs (which, admittedly, does not preserve SE,
although I imagine it could). Regardless, I actually don't think that the
preservation matters too much in this case: SE computes lazily, and this pass
won't issue any SE queries unless there are any assume intrinsics, so there
should be no real additional cost in the common case (SLP does preserve DT and
LoopInfo).

llvm-svn: 217344

show more ...