xref: /netbsd-src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_217.c (revision cd4ee416b8ecb6a5d3739b2d808bd6e8e4173867)
1 /*	$NetBSD: msg_217.c,v 1.16 2024/11/30 11:27:20 rillig Exp $	*/
2 # 3 "msg_217.c"
3 
4 // Test for message: function '%s' falls off bottom without returning value [217]
5 
6 /* lint1-extra-flags: -X 351 */
7 
8 int
9 random(int n)
10 {
11 	if (n < 0)
12 		return -3;
13 }
14 /* expect-1: warning: function 'random' falls off bottom without returning value [217] */
15 
16 /*
17  * The pattern 'do { } while (0)' is often used in statement macros.
18  * Putting a 'return' at the end of such a macro is legitimate, the embracing
19  * 'do { } while (0)' is probably there to conform to a coding standard or
20  * to otherwise reduce confusion.
21  *
22  * Seen in external/bsd/libevent/dist/event_tagging.c, function
23  * encode_int_internal.
24  *
25  * Before tree.c 1.243 from 2021-03-21, lint wrongly reported that the
26  * 'while 0' was unreachable.  This has been fixed by allowing the 'while 0'
27  * in a do-while-false loop to be unreachable.  The same could be useful for a
28  * do-while-true.
29  *
30  * Before func.c 1.83 from 2021-03-21, lint wrongly reported that the function
31  * would fall off the bottom.
32  */
33 int
34 do_while_return(int i)
35 {
36 	do {
37 		return i;
38 	} while (0);
39 }
40 
41 /*
42  * C99 5.1.2.2.3 "Program termination" p1 defines that as a special exception,
43  * the function 'main' does not have to return a value, reaching the bottom
44  * is equivalent to returning 0.
45  *
46  * Before func.c 1.72 from 2021-02-21, lint had wrongly warned about this.
47  */
48 int
49 main(void)
50 {
51 }
52 
53 int
54 reachable_continue_leads_to_endless_loop(void)
55 {
56 	for (;;) {
57 		if (1)
58 			continue;
59 		break;
60 	}
61 }
62 
63 int
64 unreachable_continue_falls_through(void)
65 {
66 	for (;;) {
67 		if (0)
68 			/* expect+1: warning: 'continue' statement not reached [193] */
69 			continue;
70 		break;
71 	}
72 }
73 /* expect-1: warning: function 'unreachable_continue_falls_through' falls off bottom without returning value [217] */
74 
75 
76 _Noreturn void noreturn_c11(void);
77 [[noreturn]] void noreturn_c23(void);
78 __attribute__((__noreturn__)) void noreturn_gnu_prefix(void);
79 void __attribute__((__noreturn__)) noreturn_gnu_infix(void);
80 void noreturn_gnu_suffix(void) __attribute__((__noreturn__));
81 
82 int
83 call_noreturn_c11(void)
84 {
85 	noreturn_c11();
86 }
87 
88 inline int
89 call_noreturn_c23(void)
90 {
91 	noreturn_c23();
92 }
93 
94 int
95 call_noreturn_gnu_prefix(void)
96 {
97 	noreturn_gnu_prefix();
98 }
99 
100 int
101 call_noreturn_gnu_infix(void)
102 {
103 	noreturn_gnu_infix();
104 }
105 
106 int
107 call_noreturn_gnu_suffix(void)
108 {
109 	noreturn_gnu_suffix();
110 }
111 
112 
113 double *force_function_attributes_in_diagnostic[] = {
114 	// Force the word 'noreturn' to occur in a diagnostic.
115 	/* expect+1: warning: illegal combination of 'pointer to double' and 'pointer to noreturn function(void) returning void', op 'init' [124] */
116 	noreturn_c23,
117 	// The 'inline' does affect the type of the function.
118 	/* expect+1: warning: illegal combination of 'pointer to double' and 'pointer to function(void) returning int', op 'init' [124] */
119 	call_noreturn_c23,
120 };
121