xref: /netbsd-src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/c99_bool_strict_suppressed.c (revision e6298b924c5ba98f3a22919b56dab04a87cdbb1c)
1 /*	$NetBSD: c99_bool_strict_suppressed.c,v 1.6 2023/07/07 19:45:22 rillig Exp $	*/
2 # 3 "c99_bool_strict_suppressed.c"
3 
4 /*
5  * In strict bool mode, like everywhere else, individual errors can be
6  * suppressed.  Suppressing a message affects lint's output as well as the
7  * exit status.  Lint's control flow stays the same as before though.
8  *
9  * This can result in assertion failures later.  One such assertion has been
10  * there since at least 1995, at the beginning of expr(), ensuring that the
11  * expression is either non-null or an error message has been _printed_.
12  * In 1995, it was not possible to suppress error messages, which means that
13  * the number of printed errors equaled the number of occurred errors.
14  *
15  * In err.c 1.12 from 2000-07-06, the option -X was added, allowing to
16  * suppress individual error messages.  That commit did not mention any
17  * interaction with the assertion in expr().  The assertion was removed in
18  * tree.c 1.305 from 2021-07-04.
19  */
20 
21 /* lint1-extra-flags: -T -X 107,330,331,332,333 -X 351 */
22 
23 /* ARGSUSED */
24 void
test(_Bool b,int i,const char * p)25 test(_Bool b, int i, const char *p)
26 {
27 
28 	/* suppressed+1: error: controlling expression must be bool, not 'int' [333] */
29 	while (1)
30 		break;
31 
32 	/* suppressed+1: error: operands of '=' have incompatible types '_Bool' and 'int' [107] */
33 	b = i;
34 
35 	/* suppressed+1: error: operand of '!' must be bool, not 'int' [330] */
36 	b = !i;
37 
38 	/* suppressed+1: error: left operand of '&&' must be bool, not 'int' [331] */
39 	b = i && b;
40 
41 	/* suppressed+1: error: right operand of '&&' must be bool, not 'int' [332] */
42 	b = b && i;
43 }
44