1.\" $NetBSD: mount_null.8,v 1.21 2005/01/31 05:19:19 erh Exp $ 2.\" 3.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994 4.\" The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. 5.\" 6.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by 7.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project. 8.\" 9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 11.\" are met: 12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 13.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 15.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the 16.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. 17.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors 18.\" may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software 19.\" without specific prior written permission. 20.\" 21.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND 22.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE 23.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 24.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE 25.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 26.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS 27.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) 28.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT 29.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY 30.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF 31.\" SUCH DAMAGE. 32.\" 33.\" @(#)mount_null.8 8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95 34.\" 35.\" 36.Dd May 1, 1995 37.Dt MOUNT_NULL 8 38.Os 39.Sh NAME 40.Nm mount_null 41.Nd mount a loopback filesystem sub-tree; 42demonstrate the use of a null file system layer 43.Sh SYNOPSIS 44.Nm 45.Op Fl o Ar options 46.Ar target 47.Ar mount-point 48.Sh DESCRIPTION 49The 50.Nm 51command creates a 52null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system 53name space under another part of the global file system namespace. 54This allows existing files and directories to be accessed 55using a different pathname. 56.Pp 57The primary differences between a virtual copy of the filesystem 58and a symbolic link are that 59.Xr getcwd 3 60functions correctly in the virtual copy, and that other filesystems 61may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original. 62A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by 63.Xr stat 2 , 64but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original. 65.Pp 66The 67.Nm 68filesystem differs from a traditional 69loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using 70a stackable layers technique, and its 71.Do 72null-nodes 73.Dc 74stack above 75all lower-layer vnodes (not just above directory vnodes). 76.Pp 77Both 78.Ar target 79and 80.Ar mount-point 81are converted to absolute paths before use. 82.Pp 83The options are as follows: 84.Bl -tag -width indent 85.It Fl o 86Options are specified with a 87.Fl o 88flag followed by a comma separated string of options. 89See the 90.Xr mount 8 91man page for possible options and their meanings. 92.El 93.Pp 94The null layer has two purposes. 95First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer 96which does nothing. 97Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer. 98Since it provides all necessary layer framework, 99new file system layers can be created very easily by starting 100with a null layer. 101.Pp 102The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis 103for constructing new layers. 104.\" 105.\" 106.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS 107New null layers are created with 108.Nm . 109.Nm 110takes two arguments, the pathname 111of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null 112layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn). 113After the null layer is put into place, the contents 114of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn. 115.\" 116.\" 117.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER 118The null layer is the minimum file system layer, 119simply passing all possible operations to the lower layer 120for processing there. 121The majority of its activity centers on the bypass routine, 122through which nearly all vnode operations pass. 123.Pp 124The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for 125handling by the lower layer. 126It begins by examining vnode operation arguments and replacing 127any null-nodes by their lower-layer equivalents. 128It then invokes the operation on the lower layer. 129Finally, it replaces the null-nodes 130in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation, 131stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode. 132.Pp 133Although bypass handles most operations, 134.Em vop_getattr , 135.Em vop_inactive , 136.Em vop_reclaim , 137and 138.Em vop_print 139are not bypassed. 140.Em vop_getattr 141must change the fsid being returned. 142.Em vop_inactive 143and vop_reclaim are not bypassed so that 144they can handle freeing null-layer specific data. 145.Em vop_print 146is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging 147information. 148.\" 149.\" 150.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS 151Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer, 152in effect stacking two VFSes. 153Vnode stacks are instead 154created on demand as files are accessed. 155.Pp 156The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the 157root of the new null layer. 158All other vnode stacks 159are created as a result of vnode operations on 160this or other null vnode stacks. 161.Pp 162New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of 163an operation which returns a vnode. 164The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new 165vnode before returning it to the caller. 166.Pp 167For example, imagine mounting a null layer with 168.Bd -literal -offset indent 169mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null 170.Ed 171Changing directory to 172.Pa /dev/layer/null 173will assign 174the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted). 175Now consider opening 176.Pa sys . 177A vop_lookup would be done on the root null-node. 178This operation would bypass through to the lower layer 179which would return a vnode representing the UFS 180.Pa sys . 181null_bypass then builds a null-node aliasing the UFS 182.Pa sys 183and returns this to the caller. 184Later operations on the null-node 185.Pa sys 186will repeat this process when constructing other vnode stacks. 187.\" 188.\" 189.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS 190One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make 191a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and 192then begin modifying the copy. 193.Xr sed 1 194can be used to easily rename all variables. 195.Pp 196The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the 197null layer. 198.\" 199.\" 200.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS 201There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer 202when the operation cannot be completely bypassed. 203Each method is appropriate in different situations. 204In both cases, it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make 205the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer 206by mapping any vnode arguments to the lower layer. 207.Pp 208The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine. 209This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation 210currently being handled on the lower layer. 211It has the advantage that the bypass routine already must do argument mapping. 212An example of this is 213.Em null_getattrs 214in the null layer. 215.Pp 216A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on 217the lower layer with the 218.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME 219interface. 220The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke 221arbitrary operations on the lower layer. 222The disadvantage is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped. 223.\" 224.\" 225.Sh SEE ALSO 226.Xr mount 8 227.Pp 228UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056, 229.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" . 230.Sh HISTORY 231The 232.Nm 233utility first appeared in 234.Bx 4.4 . 235