xref: /netbsd-src/sbin/mount_null/mount_null.8 (revision 505b78e62a399c3eb788452c20fe52c05c888f94)
1.\"	$NetBSD: mount_null.8,v 1.24 2024/07/23 15:53:43 uwe Exp $
2.\"
3.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
4.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
5.\"
6.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by
7.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
8.\"
9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
11.\" are met:
12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
13.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
16.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
17.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
18.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
19.\"    without specific prior written permission.
20.\"
21.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
22.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
23.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
24.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
25.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
26.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
27.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
28.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
29.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
30.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
31.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
32.\"
33.\"     @(#)mount_null.8	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95
34.\"
35.\"
36.Dd November 30, 2020
37.Dt MOUNT_NULL 8
38.Os
39.Sh NAME
40.Nm mount_null
41.Nd mount a loopback filesystem sub-tree;
42demonstrate the use of a null file system layer
43.Sh SYNOPSIS
44.Nm
45.Op Fl o Ar options
46.Ar target
47.Ar mount-point
48.Sh DESCRIPTION
49The
50.Nm
51command creates a
52null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system
53name space under another part of the global file system namespace.
54This allows existing files and directories to be accessed
55using a different pathname.
56.Pp
57The primary differences between a virtual copy of the filesystem
58and a symbolic link are that
59.Xr getcwd 3
60functions correctly in the virtual copy, and that other filesystems
61may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original.
62A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by
63.Xr stat 2 ,
64but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original.
65.Pp
66The
67.Nm
68filesystem differs from a traditional
69loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using
70a stackable layers technique, and its
71.Dq null-nodes
72stack above
73all lower-layer vnodes (not just above directory vnodes).
74.Pp
75Both
76.Ar target
77and
78.Ar mount-point
79are converted to absolute paths before use.
80.Pp
81The options are as follows:
82.Bl -tag -width Fl
83.It Fl o
84Options are specified with a
85.Fl o
86flag followed by a comma separated string of options.
87See the
88.Xr mount 8
89man page for possible options and their meanings.
90.El
91.Pp
92The null layer has two purposes.
93First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer
94which does nothing.
95Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer.
96Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
97new file system layers can be created very easily by starting
98with a null layer.
99.Pp
100The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis
101for constructing new layers.
102.\"
103.\"
104.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
105New null layers are created with
106.Nm .
107.Nm
108takes two arguments, the pathname
109of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
110layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn).
111After the null layer is put into place, the contents
112of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn.
113.\"
114.\"
115.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
116The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
117simply passing all possible operations to the lower layer
118for processing there.
119The majority of its activity centers on the bypass routine,
120through which nearly all vnode operations pass.
121.Pp
122The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
123handling by the lower layer.
124It begins by examining vnode operation arguments and replacing
125any null-nodes by their lower-layer equivalents.
126It then invokes the operation on the lower layer.
127Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
128in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
129stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
130.Pp
131Although bypass handles most operations,
132.Fa vop_getattr ,
133.Fa vop_inactive ,
134.Fa vop_reclaim ,
135and
136.Fa vop_print
137are not bypassed.
138.Fa vop_getattr
139must change the fsid being returned.
140.Fa vop_inactive
141and
142.Fa vop_reclaim
143are not bypassed so that
144they can handle freeing null-layer specific data.
145.Fa vop_print
146is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging
147information.
148.\"
149.\"
150.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
151Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
152in effect stacking two VFSes.
153Vnode stacks are instead
154created on demand as files are accessed.
155.Pp
156The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
157root of the new null layer.
158All other vnode stacks
159are created as a result of vnode operations on
160this or other null vnode stacks.
161.Pp
162New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
163an operation which returns a vnode.
164The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
165vnode before returning it to the caller.
166.Pp
167For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
168.Pp
169.Dl mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null
170.Pp
171Changing directory to
172.Pa /dev/layer/null
173will assign
174the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
175Now consider opening
176.Pa sys .
177A
178.Fa vop_lookup
179would be done on the root null-node.
180This operation would bypass through to the lower layer
181which would return a vnode representing the UFS
182.Pa sys .
183.Fn null_bypass
184then builds a null-node aliasing the UFS
185.Pa sys
186and returns this to the caller.
187Later operations on the null-node
188.Pa sys
189will repeat this process when constructing other vnode stacks.
190.\"
191.\"
192.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
193One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
194a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
195then begin modifying the copy.
196.Xr sed 1
197can be used to easily rename all variables.
198.Pp
199The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
200null layer.
201.\"
202.\"
203.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
204There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
205when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.
206Each method is appropriate in different situations.
207In both cases, it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
208the operation arguments
209.Dq correct
210for the lower layer
211by mapping any vnode arguments to the lower layer.
212.Pp
213The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
214This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
215currently being handled on the lower layer.
216It has the advantage that the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
217An example of this is
218.Fn null_getattrs
219in the null layer.
220.Pp
221A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on
222the lower layer with the
223.Xr vnodeops 9
224interface.
225The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
226arbitrary operations on the lower layer.
227The disadvantage is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped.
228.\"
229.\"
230.Sh EXAMPLES
231Expose
232.Nx
233source tree under
234.Pa /export/netbsd/src
235as
236.Pa /usr/src
237but in read-only mode to prevent polluting the sources with accidental
238writes:
239.Pp
240.Dl mount -t null -o ro /export/netbsd/src /usr/src
241.\"
242.\"
243.Sh SEE ALSO
244.Xr mount 8
245.Pp
246UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056,
247.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" .
248.Sh HISTORY
249The
250.Nm
251utility first appeared in
252.Bx 4.4 .
253