xref: /netbsd-src/external/cddl/dtracetoolkit/dist/Docs/Notes/ALLfbt_notes.txt (revision c29d51755812ace2e87aeefdb06cb2b4dac7087a)
1**************************************************************************
2* The following are notes for any script that uses the "fbt" provider.
3* To identify these scripts, check the "STABILITY" section of the script's
4* man page, or try grepping for "fbt" on the script.
5*
6* $Id: ALLfbt_notes.txt,v 1.1.1.1 2015/09/30 22:01:08 christos Exp $
7*
8* COPYRIGHT: Copyright (c) 2007 Brendan Gregg.
9**************************************************************************
10
11
12What is the "fbt" provider?...
13
14* A DTrace library of probes that instruments raw kernel function calls.
15* An "unstable" provider; meaning, scripts written using "fbt" are not
16  guarenteed to work on future versions of the OS - including after
17  patching the kernel.
18
19In a perfect world...
20
21* None of the DTraceToolkit scripts would use the "fbt" provider; instead
22  they would all use stable providers such as "proc", "sched", "io", etc.
23* All the DTraceToolkit scripts would run on any system that supports DTrace.
24
25In the real world...
26
27* Not all stable providers exist yet. Many are in development, such as
28  stable networking providers.
29* In the meantime, useful tools such as "tcpsnoop" and "tcptop" can
30  only be written using the unstable "fbt" provider (and these scripts have
31  broken several times due to kernel changes since they were first written).
32* "fbt" provider based scripts,
33	- only run on a particular OS (eg, Solaris)
34	- may only run on a particular version of an OS (eg, Solaris 10 3/05)
35	- are likely to break for future OS releases (eg, Solaris 10 6/06)
36* "fbt" provider based scripts also make the impossible possible, albiet
37  in a very unstable way, as a temporary solution while stable providers
38  are still in development.
39* Once stable providers exist, "fbt" scripts can be rewritten to use them;
40  however these new scripts will only run on newer OS builds that support
41  the stable providers. (in other words, this won't help you if you remain
42  on Solaris 10 6/06; you'll need to upgrade, or survive with "fbt").
43* Only some of the DTraceToolkit scripts use "fbt", and only a portion of
44  those have encountered stability issues - so this issue is limited.
45
46The "fbt" provider exports raw kernel implementation, which isn't guarenteed
47to be stable nor should it ever be (to do so would freeze kernel development
48and bug fixes). The only practical solution is the development and
49integration of stable providers (although that doesn't help people who keep
50running older versions of the OS).
51
52More harm than good?...
53
54Is the inclusion of these "fbt" scripts more harm than good? Consider,
55
56* the good,
57	- shows what is possible with DTrace
58	- should help a number of people solve specific performance issues,
59	  on systems where they run
60	- a customer who really wants these scripts but on an OS version
61	  where they don't work, have at least the source as a starting
62	  point (and in some cases, the fix was trivial)
63
64* the bad,
65	- teases and frustrates people who find these scripts don't work
66	  on their OS
67
68To minimise this issue, only a small number of "fbt" scripts have been
69included, and they have been documented (see their man page) as unstable.
70
71Can I help?...
72
73If you really like an "fbt" based script and would like to keep using it
74in a stable way, it may help to raise that with your vendor (Sun for Solaris,
75Apple for MacOS). Sun has OpenSolaris forums, such as dtrace-discuss, which
76are read by their engineers and the public.
77
78