1RUN: llvm-cxxfilt -n _Z3fooILZ3BarEET_f _Z3fooIPFcfEET_d _ZN1f2baC2ERKNS_2baIT_EE _Z3foov.123 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-PARAMS 2RUN: llvm-cxxfilt -p -n _Z3fooILZ3BarEET_f _Z3fooIPFcfEET_d _ZN1f2baC2ERKNS_2baIT_EE _Z3foov.123 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-PARAMS --match-full-lines 3RUN: llvm-cxxfilt --no-params -n _Z3fooILZ3BarEET_f _Z3fooIPFcfEET_d _ZN1f2baC2ERKNS_2baIT_EE _Z3foov.123 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-PARAMS --match-full-lines 4 5# Check that -p or --no-params flag omits function parameters and the return 6# type. 7 8CHECK-PARAMS: Bar foo<Bar>(float) 9CHECK-NO-PARAMS: foo<Bar> 10 11# Check that only the top-level function is impacted by the switch, and that 12# nested function types in the encoding (e.g. where a function type is being 13# used as a template parameter) still include their parameters. 14# 15# template <typename T> T foo(double); 16# typedef char (*F)(float); 17# F foo<F>(double) 18 19CHECK-PARAMS: char (*foo<char (*)(float)>(double))(float) 20CHECK-NO-PARAMS: foo<char (*)(float)> 21 22# Use an invalid mangled name broken in the function parameters to check how -p 23# or --no-params flag works. If the option is given we should be able to 24# demangle the function name just fine. If it is not given, demangling will fail 25# because of the invalid params. 26 27CHECK-PARAMS: _ZN1f2baC2ERKNS_2baIT_EE 28CHECK-NO-PARAMS: f::ba::ba 29 30# Check that a vendor specific suffix is also omitted when --no-params is 31# specified. This matches c++filt's behaviour. 32 33CHECK-PARAMS: foo() (.123) 34CHECK-NO-PARAMS: foo 35