1; Generate bitcode files with summary, as well as minimized bitcode without 2; the debug metadata for the thin link. 3; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thin-link-bitcode-file=%t.thinlink.bc -o %t.bc %s 4; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t.bc | FileCheck %s 5; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t.bc | FileCheck --check-prefix=BCA %s 6 7; Make sure the combined index files produced by both the normal and the 8; thin link bitcode files are identical 9; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto -o %t3 %t.bc 10; Copy the minimized bitcode to the regular bitcode path so the module 11; paths in the index are the same (save and restore the regular bitcode 12; for use again further down). 13; RUN: mv %t.bc %t.bc.sv 14; RUN: cp %t.thinlink.bc %t.bc 15; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto -o %t4 %t.bc 16; RUN: mv %t.bc.sv %t.bc 17; RUN: diff %t3.thinlto.bc %t4.thinlto.bc 18 19; Try again using -thinlto-action to produce combined index 20; RUN: rm -f %t3.thinlto.bc %t4.thinlto.bc 21; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto-action=thinlink -o %t3.thinlto.bc %t.bc 22; Copy the minimized bitcode to the regular bitcode path so the module 23; paths in the index are the same. 24; RUN: cp %t.thinlink.bc %t.bc 25; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto-action=thinlink -o %t4.thinlto.bc %t.bc 26; RUN: diff %t3.thinlto.bc %t4.thinlto.bc 27 28; BCA: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK 29 30target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" 31 32; CHECK: @g = global i8 42 33@g = global i8 42 34 35; CHECK: define void @f() 36define void @f() { 37 ret void 38} 39