xref: /llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/main.cpp (revision bddd2888264492a6deb0d447ee6ac042d3fb44e4)
1 volatile int x;
2 
sink()3 void __attribute__((noinline)) sink() {
4   x++; //% self.filecheck("bt", "main.cpp", "-implicit-check-not=artificial")
5   // CHECK: frame #0: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`sink() at main.cpp:[[@LINE-1]]:4
6   // CHECK-NEXT: func2{{.*}} [artificial]
7   // CHECK-NEXT: main{{.*}}
8 }
9 
func2()10 void __attribute__((noinline)) func2() {
11   sink(); /* tail */
12 }
13 
func1()14 void __attribute__((noinline)) func1() { sink(); /* tail */ }
15 
main(int argc,char **)16 int __attribute__((disable_tail_calls)) main(int argc, char **) {
17   // The sequences `main -> f{1,2} -> sink` are both plausible. Test that
18   // return-pc call site info allows lldb to pick the correct sequence.
19   func2();
20   if (argc == 100)
21     func1();
22   return 0;
23 }
24