xref: /llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/copypaste/functions.cpp (revision 561f0de6d96eff6efc53e6e8b07bc9408304b381)
1 // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -analyzer-config alpha.clone.CloneChecker:MinimumCloneComplexity=10 -verify %s
2 
3 // This tests if we search for clones in functions.
4 
5 void log();
6 
max(int a,int b)7 int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
8   log();
9   if (a > b)
10     return a;
11   return b;
12 }
13 
maxClone(int x,int y)14 int maxClone(int x, int y) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
15   log();
16   if (x > y)
17     return x;
18   return y;
19 }
20 
21 // Functions below are not clones and should not be reported.
22 
23 // The next two functions test that statement classes are still respected when
24 // checking for clones in expressions. This will show that the statement
25 // specific data of all base classes is collected, and not just the data of the
26 // first base class.
testBaseClass(int a,int b)27 int testBaseClass(int a, int b) { // no-warning
28   log();
29   if (a > b)
30     return true ? a : b;
31   return b;
32 }
testBaseClass2(int a,int b)33 int testBaseClass2(int a, int b) { // no-warning
34   log();
35   if (a > b)
36     return __builtin_choose_expr(true, a, b);
37   return b;
38 }
39 
40 // No clone because of the different comparison operator.
min1(int a,int b)41 int min1(int a, int b) { // no-warning
42   log();
43   if (a < b)
44     return a;
45   return b;
46 }
47 
48 // No clone because of the different pattern in which the variables are used.
min2(int a,int b)49 int min2(int a, int b) { // no-warning
50   log();
51   if (a > b)
52     return b;
53   return a;
54 }
55 
foo(int a,int b)56 int foo(int a, int b) { // no-warning
57   return a + b;
58 }
59