xref: /llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/switch-bt.ll (revision e3cf80c5c1fe55efd8216575ccadea0ab087e79c)
1; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
2; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-- < %s -jump-table-density=40 -switch-peel-threshold=101 | FileCheck %s
3
4; This switch should use bit tests, and the third bit test case is just
5; testing for one possible value, so it doesn't need a bt.
6
7define void @test(ptr %l) nounwind {
8; CHECK-LABEL: test:
9; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
10; CHECK-NEXT:    pushq %rax
11; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rdi, (%rsp)
12; CHECK-NEXT:    movsbl (%rdi), %eax
13; CHECK-NEXT:    addl $-33, %eax
14; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $61, %eax
15; CHECK-NEXT:    ja .LBB0_7
16; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %entry
17; CHECK-NEXT:    movabsq $2305843009482129440, %rcx # imm = 0x2000000010000020
18; CHECK-NEXT:    btq %rax, %rcx
19; CHECK-NEXT:    jb .LBB0_6
20; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2: # %entry
21; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $671088640, %ecx # imm = 0x28000000
22; CHECK-NEXT:    btq %rax, %rcx
23; CHECK-NEXT:    jae .LBB0_3
24; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.5: # %sw.bb
25; CHECK-NEXT:    xorl %edi, %edi
26; CHECK-NEXT:    jmp .LBB0_8
27; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_6: # %sw.bb2
28; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $1, %edi
29; CHECK-NEXT:    jmp .LBB0_8
30; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_3: # %entry
31; CHECK-NEXT:    testq %rax, %rax
32; CHECK-NEXT:    jne .LBB0_7
33; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4: # %sw.bb4
34; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $3, %edi
35; CHECK-NEXT:    jmp .LBB0_8
36; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_7: # %sw.default
37; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $97, %edi
38; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_8: # %sw.epilog
39; CHECK-NEXT:    callq foo@PLT
40; CHECK-NEXT:    popq %rax
41; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
42entry:
43  %l.addr = alloca ptr, align 8                   ; <ptr> [#uses=2]
44  store ptr %l, ptr %l.addr
45  %tmp = load ptr, ptr %l.addr                        ; <ptr> [#uses=1]
46  %tmp1 = load i8, ptr %tmp                           ; <i8> [#uses=1]
47  %conv = sext i8 %tmp1 to i32                    ; <i32> [#uses=1]
48  switch i32 %conv, label %sw.default [
49    i32 62, label %sw.bb
50    i32 60, label %sw.bb
51    i32 38, label %sw.bb2
52    i32 94, label %sw.bb2
53    i32 61, label %sw.bb2
54    i32 33, label %sw.bb4
55  ]
56
57sw.bb:                                            ; preds = %entry, %entry
58  call void @foo(i32 0)
59  br label %sw.epilog
60
61sw.bb2:                                           ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry
62  call void @foo(i32 1)
63  br label %sw.epilog
64
65sw.bb4:                                           ; preds = %entry
66  call void @foo(i32 3)
67  br label %sw.epilog
68
69sw.default:                                       ; preds = %entry
70  call void @foo(i32 97)
71  br label %sw.epilog
72
73sw.epilog:                                        ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb4, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb
74  ret void
75}
76
77declare void @foo(i32)
78
79; Don't zero extend the test operands to pointer type if it can be avoided.
80; rdar://8781238
81define void @test2(i32 %x) nounwind ssp {
82; CHECK-LABEL: test2:
83; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
84; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $6, %edi
85; CHECK-NEXT:    ja .LBB1_2
86; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %entry
87; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $91, %eax
88; CHECK-NEXT:    btl %edi, %eax
89; CHECK-NEXT:    jb bar@PLT # TAILCALL
90; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB1_2: # %if.end
91; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
92
93entry:
94  switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
95    i32 6, label %if.then
96    i32 4, label %if.then
97    i32 3, label %if.then
98    i32 1, label %if.then
99    i32 0, label %if.then
100  ]
101
102if.then:                                          ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %entry, %entry
103  tail call void @bar() nounwind
104  ret void
105
106if.end:                                           ; preds = %entry
107  ret void
108}
109
110declare void @bar()
111
112define void @test3(i32 %x) nounwind {
113; CHECK-LABEL: test3:
114; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
115; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $5, %edi
116; CHECK-NEXT:    ja .LBB2_2
117; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1:
118; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $4, %edi
119; CHECK-NEXT:    jne bar@PLT # TAILCALL
120; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB2_2: # %if.end
121; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
122  switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
123    i32 0, label %if.then
124    i32 1, label %if.then
125    i32 2, label %if.then
126    i32 3, label %if.then
127    i32 5, label %if.then
128  ]
129if.then:
130  tail call void @bar() nounwind
131  ret void
132if.end:
133  ret void
134}
135
136; Ensure that optimizing for jump tables doesn't needlessly deteriorate the
137; created binary tree search. See PR22262.
138define void @test4(i32 %x, ptr %y) {
139; CHECK-LABEL: test4:
140; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
141; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $39, %edi
142; CHECK-NEXT:    jg .LBB3_5
143; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %entry
144; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $10, %edi
145; CHECK-NEXT:    je .LBB3_9
146; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2: # %entry
147; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $20, %edi
148; CHECK-NEXT:    je .LBB3_10
149; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.3: # %entry
150; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $30, %edi
151; CHECK-NEXT:    jne .LBB3_13
152; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4: # %sw.bb2
153; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $3, (%rsi)
154; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
155; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_5: # %entry
156; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $40, %edi
157; CHECK-NEXT:    je .LBB3_11
158; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.6: # %entry
159; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $50, %edi
160; CHECK-NEXT:    je .LBB3_12
161; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.7: # %entry
162; CHECK-NEXT:    cmpl $60, %edi
163; CHECK-NEXT:    jne .LBB3_13
164; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.8: # %sw.bb5
165; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $6, (%rsi)
166; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
167; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_9: # %sw.bb
168; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $1, (%rsi)
169; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
170; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_11: # %sw.bb3
171; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $4, (%rsi)
172; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
173; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_13: # %sw.default
174; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $7, (%rsi)
175; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
176; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_10: # %sw.bb1
177; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $2, (%rsi)
178; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
179; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB3_12: # %sw.bb4
180; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $5, (%rsi)
181; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
182
183entry:
184  switch i32 %x, label %sw.default [
185    i32 10, label %sw.bb
186    i32 20, label %sw.bb1
187    i32 30, label %sw.bb2
188    i32 40, label %sw.bb3
189    i32 50, label %sw.bb4
190    i32 60, label %sw.bb5
191  ]
192sw.bb:
193  store i32 1, ptr %y
194  br label %sw.epilog
195sw.bb1:
196  store i32 2, ptr %y
197  br label %sw.epilog
198sw.bb2:
199  store i32 3, ptr %y
200  br label %sw.epilog
201sw.bb3:
202  store i32 4, ptr %y
203  br label %sw.epilog
204sw.bb4:
205  store i32 5, ptr %y
206  br label %sw.epilog
207sw.bb5:
208  store i32 6, ptr %y
209  br label %sw.epilog
210sw.default:
211  store i32 7, ptr %y
212  br label %sw.epilog
213sw.epilog:
214  ret void
215
216; The balanced binary switch here would start with a comparison against 39, but
217; it is currently starting with 29 because of the density-sum heuristic.
218}
219
220
221; Omit the range check when the default case is unreachable, see PR43129.
222declare void @g(i32)
223define void @test5(i32 %x) {
224; CHECK-LABEL: test5:
225; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
226; CHECK-NEXT:    pushq %rax
227; CHECK-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
228; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $73, %eax
229; CHECK-NEXT:    btl %edi, %eax
230; CHECK-NEXT:    jb .LBB4_3
231; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %entry
232; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $146, %eax
233; CHECK-NEXT:    btl %edi, %eax
234; CHECK-NEXT:    jae .LBB4_2
235; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4: # %bb1
236; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $1, %edi
237; CHECK-NEXT:    callq g@PLT
238; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB4_3: # %bb0
239; CHECK-NEXT:    xorl %edi, %edi
240; CHECK-NEXT:    callq g@PLT
241; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB4_2: # %bb2
242; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $2, %edi
243; CHECK-NEXT:    callq g@PLT
244
245entry:
246  switch i32 %x, label %return [
247    ; 73 = 2^0 + 2^3 + 2^6
248    i32 0, label %bb0
249    i32 3, label %bb0
250    i32 6, label %bb0
251
252    ; 146 = 2^1 + 2^4 + 2^7
253    i32 1, label %bb1
254    i32 4, label %bb1
255    i32 7, label %bb1
256
257    i32 2, label %bb2
258    i32 5, label %bb2
259    i32 8, label %bb2
260  ]
261bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
262bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
263bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
264return: unreachable
265}
266