xref: /llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-transitive-identifier-change.cppm (revision 03921b979d67657bfc9cf8240add2484cc4df6a7)
1// Testing that adding an new identifier in an unused module file won't change
2// the BMI of the current module file.
3//
4// RUN: rm -rf %t
5// RUN: split-file %s %t
6//
7// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/m-partA.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/m-partA.pcm
8// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/m-partA.v1.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o \
9// RUN:     %t/m-partA.v1.pcm
10// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/m-partB.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/m-partB.pcm
11// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/m.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/m.pcm \
12// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
13// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/m.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/m.v1.pcm \
14// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.v1.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
15//
16// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/useBOnly.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/useBOnly.pcm \
17// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m=%t/m.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.pcm \
18// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
19// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/useBOnly.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/useBOnly.v1.pcm \
20// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m=%t/m.v1.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.v1.pcm \
21// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
22// Since useBOnly only uses partB from module M, the change in partA shouldn't affect
23// useBOnly.
24// RUN: diff %t/useBOnly.pcm %t/useBOnly.v1.pcm &> /dev/null
25//
26// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/useAOnly.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/useAOnly.pcm \
27// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m=%t/m.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.pcm \
28// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
29// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/useAOnly.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/useAOnly.v1.pcm \
30// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m=%t/m.v1.pcm -fmodule-file=m:partA=%t/m-partA.v1.pcm \
31// RUN:     -fmodule-file=m:partB=%t/m-partB.pcm
32// useAOnly should differ
33// RUN: not diff %t/useAOnly.pcm %t/useAOnly.v1.pcm &> /dev/null
34
35//--- m-partA.cppm
36export module m:partA;
37
38export inline int getA() {
39    return 43;
40}
41
42export class A {
43public:
44    int getMem();
45};
46
47export template <typename T>
48class ATempl {
49public:
50    T getT();
51};
52
53//--- m-partA.v1.cppm
54export module m:partA;
55
56export inline int getA() {
57    return 43;
58}
59
60// The consuming module which didn't use m:partA completely is expected to be
61// not changed.
62export inline int getA2() {
63    return 88;
64}
65
66export class A {
67public:
68    int getMem();
69
70    // The consuming module which didn't use m:partA completely is expected to be
71    // not changed.
72    int getMem2();
73};
74
75export template <typename T>
76class ATempl {
77public:
78    T getT();
79    T getT2();
80};
81
82//--- m-partB.cppm
83export module m:partB;
84
85export inline int getB() {
86    return 430;
87}
88
89//--- m.cppm
90export module m;
91export import :partA;
92export import :partB;
93
94//--- useBOnly.cppm
95export module useBOnly;
96import m;
97
98export inline int get() {
99    return getB();
100}
101
102//--- useAOnly.cppm
103export module useAOnly;
104import m;
105
106export inline int get() {
107    return getA();
108}
109