so_ver: increase all major versions after SPDK 24.01

To allow SO_MINOR updates on LTS for the whole year it is supported,
the major version for all components needs to be increased.
This is to preve

so_ver: increase all major versions after SPDK 24.01

To allow SO_MINOR updates on LTS for the whole year it is supported,
the major version for all components needs to be increased.
This is to prevent scenario where two versions exists with matching
versions, but conflicting ABI.
Ex. Next SPDK release adds an API call increasing the minor version,
then LTS needs just a subset of those additions.

Increasing major so version after LTS, allows the future releases
to update versions as needed. Yet allowing LTS to increase minor
version separately.

This patch:
- increases SO_VER by 1 for all components
- resets SO_MINOR to 0 for all components

Due to patch below being introduced after v24.01 code freeze,
bdev lib version should not be increased:
61623c5ca9 bdev: add spdk_bdev_io padding in place of io_submit_ch

Short reference to how the versions were changed:
MAX=$(git grep "SO_VER := " | cut -d" " -f 3 | sort -ubnr | head -1)
for((i=$MAX;i>0;i-=1)); do find . -name "Makefile" -exec \
sed -i -e "s/SO_VER := $i\$/SO_VER := $(($i+1))/g" {} +; done
find . -name "Makefile" -exec \
sed -i -e "s/SO_MINOR := .*/SO_MINOR := 0/g" {} +

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I0166d6be6c17bbbf985d48b5dfcb36f1d4af1b48
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/21582
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>

show more ...

so_ver: increase all major versions

To allow SO_MINOR updates on LTS for the whole year it is supported,
the major version for all components needs to be increased.
This is to prevent scenario where

so_ver: increase all major versions

To allow SO_MINOR updates on LTS for the whole year it is supported,
the major version for all components needs to be increased.
This is to prevent scenario where two versions exists with matching
versions, but conflicting ABI.
Ex. Next SPDK release adds an API call increasing the minor version,
then LTS needs just a subset of those additions.

Increasing major so version after LTS, allows the future releases
to update versions as needed. Yet allowing LTS to increase minor
version separately.

Disabled test for increasing SO version without ABI change, as
that is goal of this patch. This check shall be removed with SPDK 23.05
release.
Looks like this was left over from prior LTS, to avoid that
make sure it is only skipped when running against v23.01.x as latest
release.

This patch:
- increases SO_VER by 1 for all components
- resets SO_MINOR to 0 for all components
- removes suppressions for ABI tests


Short reference to how the versions were changed:
MAX=$(git grep "SO_VER := " | cut -d" " -f 3 | sort -ubnr | head -1)
for((i=$MAX;i>0;i-=1)); do find . -name "Makefile" -exec \
sed -i -e "s/SO_VER := $i\$/SO_VER := $(($i+1))/g" {} +; done
find . -name "Makefile" -exec \
sed -i -e "s/SO_MINOR := .*/SO_MINOR := 0/g" {} +

Change-Id: I3e5681802c0a5ac6d7d652a18896997cd07cc8bf
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/16419
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>

show more ...

update Intel copyright notices

per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.

git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date defa

update Intel copyright notices

per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.

git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date default <file> | tail -1

and then pull just the 4 digit year from the result.

Intel copyrights were not added to files where Intel either had
no contribution ot the contribution lacked substance (ie license
header updates, formatting changes, etc). Contribution date used
"--follow -C95%" to get the most accurate date.

Note that several files in this patch didn't end the license/(c)
block with a blank comment line so these were added as the vast
majority of files do have this last blank line. Simply there for
consistency.

Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id5b7ce4f658fe87132f14139ead58d6e285c04d4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15192
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot

show more ...

Replace most BSD 3-clause license text with SPDX identifier.

Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in

Replace most BSD 3-clause license text with SPDX identifier.

Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in every source file. This patch replaces
the bulk of SPDK .c, .cpp and Makefiles with the BSD-3-Clause
identifier.

Almost all of these files share the exact same license text,
and this patch only modifies the files that contain the
most common license text. There can be slight variations
because the third clause contains company names - most say
"Intel Corporation", but there are instances for Nvidia,
Samsung, Eideticom and even "the copyright holder".

Used a bash script to automate replacement of the license text
with SPDX identifier which is checked into scripts/spdx.sh.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaa88ab5e92ea471691dc298cfe41ebfb5d169780
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12904
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <qun.wan@intel.com>

show more ...