History log of /openbsd-src/lib/libc/arch/arm/string/_memcpy.S (Results 1 – 7 of 7)
Revision Date Author Comments
# 8ead0783 29-Oct-2017 guenther <guenther@openbsd.org>

Stop exporting _memcpy, an implementation detail of bcopy/memcpy/memmove

ok kettenis@ deraadt@


# 38848718 06-Aug-2016 guenther <guenther@openbsd.org>

Use internal names for __errno, _memcpy, memset, and {,_}{set,long}jmp
Eliminate pointless use of PIC_SYM()
Split out DEFS.h from SYS.h like some other archs

ok kettenis@ deraadt@


# 9b9d2a55 31-Aug-2015 guenther <guenther@openbsd.org>

Add framework for resolving (pun intended) libc namespace issues, using
wrapper .h files and asm labels to let internal calls resolve directly and
not be overridable or use the PLT. Then, apply that

Add framework for resolving (pun intended) libc namespace issues, using
wrapper .h files and asm labels to let internal calls resolve directly and
not be overridable or use the PLT. Then, apply that framework to most of
the functions in stdio.h, string.h, err.h, and wchar.h. Delete the
should-have-been-hidden-all-along _v?(err|warn)[cx]? symbols while here.

tests clean on i386, amd64, sparc64, powerpc, and mips64

naming feedback from kettenis@ and millert@
ok kettenis@

show more ...


# c6b709f5 08-Jun-2015 jsg <jsg@openbsd.org>

At some point arm moved to a unified syntax for arm and thumb instructions.
While binutils supports both "unified" and "divided" syntax (defaulting
to divided) the integrated assembler in clang only

At some point arm moved to a unified syntax for arm and thumb instructions.
While binutils supports both "unified" and "divided" syntax (defaulting
to divided) the integrated assembler in clang only supports unified names
so switch some files to unified syntax. Similiar changes were made in
bitrig and freebsd. No difference in objdump -d output.

tested on zaurus by deraadt@, ok miod@

show more ...


# d874cce4 26-Jun-2008 ray <ray@openbsd.org>

First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.

Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to
catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of
code t

First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.

Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to
catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of
code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the
actual authors.

OK deraadt@

show more ...


# d45a0e27 01-Feb-2004 drahn <drahn@openbsd.org>

ARGH, forgot tags.


# d987040f 01-Feb-2004 drahn <drahn@openbsd.org>

arm libc support. From NetBSD. currently supports softfloat.