| #
d434d049 |
| 11-Oct-2024 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Allow '+' to be specified as the "one char option name" for long options that don't have a 1 char equivalent, but do want to become a member of an option set. The '+' is otherwise ignored. This is
Allow '+' to be specified as the "one char option name" for long options that don't have a 1 char equivalent, but do want to become a member of an option set. The '+' is otherwise ignored. This is similar to '-' in that position, except that skips past the option set field, and is followed directly by the default value, '+' does not do that.
This currently changes nothing, as there are no current options that use it (or would want to).
show more ...
|
| #
eda85bc1 |
| 16-Apr-2024 |
christos <christos@NetBSD.org> |
Be more explicit with sort fields to produce consistent results with gnu sort (Jan-Benedict Glaw)
|
| #
1568b401 |
| 06-Apr-2024 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Redo the mktemp(1) part - some mktemp's (including ours) require the XXXX's to be at the end of the name (like mk*temp(3)) so however well it will work with mktemp implementations which allow the X's
Redo the mktemp(1) part - some mktemp's (including ours) require the XXXX's to be at the end of the name (like mk*temp(3)) so however well it will work with mktemp implementations which allow the X's to be anywhere in the final component of the name, it will work just as well on them with the X's at the end.
But we don't normally need all of that mess - knowing which temp file is which is useful only when debugging the script, and that's (mostly) long done. So, in normal uses now just use $(mktemp) and allow mktemp to pick its own name - we don't need to know what it is. Every mktemp(1) supports that mode of operation.
Bug when debugging the script (which for current purposes will be taken to be when the -x flag is passed to the shell running it, to trace what it does) then we will make the temp files have names we can recognise (and in that case, also don't delete them when done).
While here, check for mktemp(1) failing, and abort if that happens (we assume that if it fails it will write an error message to stderr, so the script does not need to.)
As for the purpose of the script ... of course the header file generated (or an equivalent elsewhere) could be generated and maintained by hand, but why would anyone want to do all that work when software can do it for us, and do it correctly without human thought?
This also allows the options in the master list (option.list) to be arranged in a way that is meaningful for them, unrelated to the order the shell needs to have them in (or rearrange them to be at run time) and have that order shuffled however is convenient. Currently all the posix standard options are first, then the "hybrid" options, and finally the local ones for this shell. Currently "pipefail" is in the final set, but once the next posix version is published, that will become a standard option, and get moved in the list - the shell won't even notice as this script puts the options into shell desired order.
show more ...
|
| #
3200c281 |
| 05-Apr-2024 |
christos <christos@NetBSD.org> |
From Jan-Benedict Glaw:
Fix a redirection and prepare a stable sort for upper-/lowercase option letters
This script is a mess, I strongly believe that it should be rewritten. However, I'm not 100%
From Jan-Benedict Glaw:
Fix a redirection and prepare a stable sort for upper-/lowercase option letters
This script is a mess, I strongly believe that it should be rewritten. However, I'm not 100% sure why it was invented in the first place (come on, the generated header file isn't _that_ complicated that it couldn't be sanely managed by hand!), but let's fix the sorting order by using LC_ALL=C.
Also add a few 'X' to the `mktemp` template to make non-BSD implementations happy. As a bonus, actually *use* the initial `sed` output instead of throwing it away by piping it into `sort` with also connecting `sort`'s stdin with the original input file...
show more ...
|
| #
20c8eb69 |
| 15-Nov-2017 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Sort options with long names that differ only by char case in the same order that option flags with a similar property are sorted. This corresponds with the change made to the sort order of the short
Sort options with long names that differ only by char case in the same order that option flags with a similar property are sorted. This corresponds with the change made to the sort order of the short names made in the previous update (1.4).
Right now, this change makes no difference at all, as there are no long option names that differ only in char case (yet.)
show more ...
|
| #
2ff69d1b |
| 01-Jul-2017 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Make $- list flags in the same order they appear in sh(1)
|
| #
bbd0083b |
| 19-Jun-2017 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
"b" more forgiving when sorting options to allow reasonable (and intended) flexibility in option.list format. Changes nothing for current option.list.
|
| #
d6a4153f |
| 28-May-2017 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Redo mkoptions.sh .. much better this way, now fully automated option sorting (no longer required option.list to be manually sorted by long option name) and properly handles conditional options. Cl
Redo mkoptions.sh .. much better this way, now fully automated option sorting (no longer required option.list to be manually sorted by long option name) and properly handles conditional options. Cleaner output format as well.
This allows option.list to be reordered to group related options together ... also added more comments to it.
show more ...
|
| #
f359a311 |
| 28-May-2017 |
kre <kre@NetBSD.org> |
Arrange for set -o and $- output to be sorted, rather than more or less random (and becoming worse as more options are added.) Since the data is known at compile time, sort at compile time, rather th
Arrange for set -o and $- output to be sorted, rather than more or less random (and becoming worse as more options are added.) Since the data is known at compile time, sort at compile time, rather than at run time.
show more ...
|