Apply clang-tidy fixes for performance-unnecessary-value-param in FileLineColLocBreakpointManagerTest.cpp (NFC)

Introduce MLIR Op Properties

This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to

Introduce MLIR Op Properties

This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:

struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};

More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.

The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:

- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object

Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.

A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:

let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;

When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.

Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.

Recommit d572cd1b067f after fixing python bindings build.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742

show more ...

Revert "Introduce MLIR Op Properties"

This reverts commit d572cd1b067f1177a981a4711bf2e501eaa8117b.

Some bots are broken and investigation is needed before relanding.

Introduce MLIR Op Properties

This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to

Introduce MLIR Op Properties

This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:

struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};

More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.

The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:

- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object

Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.

A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:

let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;

When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.

Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742

show more ...

Add a breakpoint manager that matches based on File/Line/Col Locations

This will match the locations attached to the IRunits passed in as context
with an action.

This is a recommit of d09c80515d0e

Add a breakpoint manager that matches based on File/Line/Col Locations

This will match the locations attached to the IRunits passed in as context
with an action.

This is a recommit of d09c80515d0e after fixing the test on Windows.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144815

show more ...

Add a breakpoint manager that matches based on File/Line/Col Locations

This will match the locations attached to the IRunits passed in as context
with an action.

Differential Revision: https://revi

Add a breakpoint manager that matches based on File/Line/Col Locations

This will match the locations attached to the IRunits passed in as context
with an action.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144815

show more ...