Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
34a35a8b |
| 31-Aug-2023 |
Martin Erhart <merhart@google.com> |
[mlir] Move FunctionInterfaces to Interfaces directory and inherit from CallableOpInterface
Functions are always callable operations and thus every operation implementing the `FunctionOpInterface` a
[mlir] Move FunctionInterfaces to Interfaces directory and inherit from CallableOpInterface
Functions are always callable operations and thus every operation implementing the `FunctionOpInterface` also implements the `CallableOpInterface`. The only exception was the FuncOp in the toy example. To make implementation of the `FunctionOpInterface` easier, this commit lets `FunctionOpInterface` inherit from `CallableOpInterface` and merges some of their methods. More precisely, the `CallableOpInterface` has methods to get the argument and result attributes and a method to get the result types of the callable region. These methods are always implemented the same way as their analogues in `FunctionOpInterface` and thus this commit moves all the argument and result attribute handling methods to the callable interface as well as the methods to get the argument and result types. The `FuntionOpInterface` then does not have to declare them as well, but just inherits them from the `CallableOpInterface`. Adding the inheritance relation also required to move the `FunctionOpInterface` from the IR directory to the Interfaces directory since IR should not depend on Interfaces.
Reviewed By: jpienaar, springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157988
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
#
5e50dd04 |
| 31-Mar-2022 |
River Riddle <riddleriver@gmail.com> |
[mlir] Rework the implementation of TypeID
This commit restructures how TypeID is implemented to ideally avoid the current problems related to shared libraries. This is done by changing the "implici
[mlir] Rework the implementation of TypeID
This commit restructures how TypeID is implemented to ideally avoid the current problems related to shared libraries. This is done by changing the "implicit" fallback path to use the name of the type, instead of using a static template variable (which breaks shared libraries). The major downside to this is that it adds some additional initialization costs for the implicit path. Given the use of type names for uniqueness in the fallback, we also no longer allow types defined in anonymous namespaces to have an implicit TypeID. To simplify defining an ID for these classes, a new `MLIR_DEFINE_EXPLICIT_INTERNAL_INLINE_TYPE_ID` macro was added to allow for explicitly defining a TypeID directly on an internal class.
To help identify when types are using the fallback, `-debug-only=typeid` can be used to log which types are using implicit ids.
This change generally only requires changes to the test passes, which are all defined in anonymous namespaces, and thus can't use the fallback any longer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122775
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
87d6bf37 |
| 08-Mar-2022 |
River Riddle <riddleriver@gmail.com> |
[mlir][test] Generalize a bunch of FuncOp based passes to run on any operation/interfaces
A lot of test passes are currently anchored on FuncOp, but this dependency is generally just historical. A m
[mlir][test] Generalize a bunch of FuncOp based passes to run on any operation/interfaces
A lot of test passes are currently anchored on FuncOp, but this dependency is generally just historical. A majority of these test passes can run on any operation, or can operate on a specific interface (FunctionOpInterface/SymbolOpInterface). This allows for greatly reducing the API dependency on FuncOp, which is slated to be moved out of the Builtin dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121191
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
41574554 |
| 04-Jan-2022 |
River Riddle <riddleriver@gmail.com> |
[mlir][Pass] Deprecate FunctionPass in favor of OperationPass<FuncOp>
The only benefit of FunctionPass is that it filters out function declarations. This isn't enough to justify carrying it around,
[mlir][Pass] Deprecate FunctionPass in favor of OperationPass<FuncOp>
The only benefit of FunctionPass is that it filters out function declarations. This isn't enough to justify carrying it around, as we can simplify filter out declarations when necessary within the pass. We can also explore with better scheduling primitives to filter out declarations at the pipeline level in the future.
The definition of FunctionPass is left intact for now to allow time for downstream users to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117182
show more ...
|
#
755dc07d |
| 15-Jan-2022 |
River Riddle <riddleriver@gmail.com> |
[mlir:Analysis] Move the LoopAnalysis library to Dialect/Affine/Analysis
The current state of the top level Analysis/ directory is that it contains two libraries; a generic Analysis library (free fr
[mlir:Analysis] Move the LoopAnalysis library to Dialect/Affine/Analysis
The current state of the top level Analysis/ directory is that it contains two libraries; a generic Analysis library (free from dialect dependencies), and a LoopAnalysis library that contains various analysis utilities that originated from Affine loop transformations. This commit moves the LoopAnalysis to the more appropriate home of `Dialect/Affine/Analysis/`, given the use and intention of the majority of the code within it. After the move, if there are generic utilities that would fit better in the top-level Analysis/ directory, we can move them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117351
show more ...
|
#
be0a7e9f |
| 07-Dec-2021 |
Mehdi Amini <joker.eph@gmail.com> |
Adjust "end namespace" comment in MLIR to match new agree'd coding style
See D115115 and this mailing list discussion: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-December/154199.html
Differenti
Adjust "end namespace" comment in MLIR to match new agree'd coding style
See D115115 and this mailing list discussion: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-December/154199.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115309
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
2a876a71 |
| 22-Sep-2021 |
Diego Caballero <diegocaballero@google.com> |
[mlir] Create a generic reduction detection utility
This patch introduces a generic reduction detection utility that works across different dialecs. It is mostly a generalization of the reduction de
[mlir] Create a generic reduction detection utility
This patch introduces a generic reduction detection utility that works across different dialecs. It is mostly a generalization of the reduction detection algorithm in Affine. The reduction detection logic in Affine, Linalg and SCFToOpenMP have been replaced with this new generic utility.
The utility takes some basic components of the potential reduction and returns: 1) the reduced value, and 2) a list with the combiner operations. The logic to match reductions involving multiple combiner operations disabled until we can properly test it.
Reviewed By: ftynse, bondhugula, nicolasvasilache, pifon2a
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110303
show more ...
|