History log of /llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/tests/shtest-inject.py (Results 1 – 12 of 12)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3
# 3dc7039f 03-Oct-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

[lit] Fix shell commands with newlines (#67898)

In PR #65242 (landed as 9e739fdb85ac672f3e25e971d96e71823e07ebda), I
claimed that RUN lines cannot contain newlines. Actually, they can after
substi

[lit] Fix shell commands with newlines (#67898)

In PR #65242 (landed as 9e739fdb85ac672f3e25e971d96e71823e07ebda), I
claimed that RUN lines cannot contain newlines. Actually, they can after
substitution expansion. More generally, a lit config file can define
substitutions or preamble commands containing newlines. While both of
those cases seem unlikely in practice,
[D154987](https://reviews.llvm.org/D154987) proposes PYTHON directives
where it seems very likely.

Regardless of the use case, without this patch, such newlines break
expansion of `%dbg(RUN: at line N)`, and the fix is simple.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.2
# f223022a 19-Sep-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell

This patch and D154984 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

Motivation
----------

D154984 rem

[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell

This patch and D154984 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

Motivation
----------

D154984 removes the "Script:" section that lit prints along with a
test's output, and it makes -v and -a imply -vv. For example, after
D154984, the "Script:" section below is never shown, but -v is enough
to produce the execution trace following it:

```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello | FileCheck bogus.txt && echo success
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello"
# command output:
hello

$ "FileCheck" "bogus.txt"
# command stderr:
Could not open check file 'bogus.txt': No such file or directory

error: command failed with exit status: 2

--
```

In the D154984 review, some reviewers point out that they have been
using the "Script:" section for copying and pasting a test's shell
commands to a terminal window. The shell commands as printed in the
execution trace can be harder to copy and paste for the following
reasons:

- They drop redirections and break apart RUN lines at `&&`, `|`, etc.
- They add `$` at the start of every command, which makes it hard to
copy and paste multiple commands in bulk.
- Command stdout, stderr, etc. are interleaved with the commands and
are not clearly delineated.
- They don't always use proper shell quoting. Instead, they blindly
enclose all command-line arguments in double quotes.

Changes
-------

D154984 plus this patch converts the above example into:

```
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
echo hello | FileCheck bogus-file.txt && echo success
# executed command: echo hello
# .---command stdout------------
# | hello
# `-----------------------------
# executed command: FileCheck bogus-file.txt
# .---command stderr------------
# | Could not open check file 'bogus-file.txt': No such file or directory
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 2

--
```

Thus, this patch addresses the above issues as follows:

- The entire execution trace can be copied and pasted in bulk to a
terminal for correct execution of the RUN lines, which are printed
intact as they appeared in the original RUN lines except lit
substitutions are expanded. Everything else in the execution trace
appears in shell comments so it has no effect in a terminal.
- Each of the RUN line's commands is repeated (in shell comments) as
it executes to show (1) that the command actually executed (e.g.,
`echo success` above didn't) and (2) what stdout, stderr, non-zero
exit status, and output files are associated with the command, if
any. Shell quoting in the command is now correct and minimal but is
not necessarily the original shell quoting from the RUN line.
- The start and end of the contents of stdout, stderr, or an output
file is now delineated clearly in the trace.

To help produce some of the above output, this patch extends lit's
internal shell with a built-in `@echo` command. It's like `echo`
except lit suppresses the normal execution trace for `@echo` and just
prints its stdout directly. For now, `@echo` isn't documented for use
in lit tests.

Without this patch, libcxx's custom lit test format tries to parse the
stdout from `lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` (which runs lit's
internal shell) to extract the stdout and stderr produced by shell
commands, and that parse no longer works after the above changes.
This patch makes a small adjustment to
`lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` so libcxx can just request
stdout and stderr without an execution trace.

(As a minor drive-by fix that came up in testing: lit's internal `not`
command now always produces a numeric exit status and never `True`.)

Caveat
------

This patch only makes the above changes for lit's internal shell. In
most cases, we do not know how to force external shells (e.g., bash,
sh, window's `cmd`) to produce execution traces in the manner we want.

To configure a test suite to use lit's internal shell (which is
usually better for test portability than external shells anyway), add
this to the test suite's `lit.cfg` or other configuration file:

```
config.test_format = lit.formats.ShTest(execute_external=False)
```

Reviewed By: MaskRay, awarzynski

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156954

show more ...


# 1495d51e 19-Sep-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv

This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

**Motivation**: -a shows output from al

[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv

This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

**Motivation**: -a shows output from all tests, and -v shows output
from just failed tests. Without this patch, that output from each
test includes a section called "Script:", which includes all shell
commands that lit has computed from RUN directives and will attempt to
run for that test. The effect of -vv (which also implies -v if
neither -a or -v is specified) is to extend that output with shell
commands as they are executing so you can easily see which one failed.

For example, when using lit's internal shell and -vv:

```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello world
: 'RUN: at line 2'; 3c40 hello world
: 'RUN: at line 3'; echo hello world
--
Exit Code: 127

Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello" "world"
hello world

$ ":" "RUN: at line 2"
$ "3c40" "hello" "world"
'3c40': command not found
error: command failed with exit status: 127

--
```

Notice that all shell commands that actually execute appear in the
output twice, once for "Script:" and once for -vv. Especially for
tests with many RUN directives, the result is noisy. When searching
through the output for a particular shell command, it is easy to get
lost and mistake shell commands under "Script:" for shell commands
that actually executed.

**Change**: With this patch, a test's output changes in two ways.
First, the "Script:" section is never shown. Second, omitting -vv no
longer disables printing of shell commands as they execute. That is,
-a and -v imply -vv, and so -vv is deprecated as it is just an alias
for -v.

**Secondary motivation**: We are also working to introduce a PYTHON
directive, which can appear between RUN directives. How should PYTHON
directives be represented in the "Script:" section, which has
previously been just a shell script? We could probably think of
something, but adding info about PYTHON directive execution in the -vv
trace seems more straight-forward and more useful.

(This patch also removes a confusing point in the -vv documentation:
at least when using bash as an external shell, -vv echoes commands to
the shell's stderr not stdout.)

Reviewed By: awarzynski, Endill, ldionne, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154984

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0
# 9f111d99 07-Sep-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

Revert "[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv"

This reverts commit 09b6e457d91ce84088e6e21783913e5f1e5bd227.

The reason for the revert is discussed at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-imp

Revert "[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv"

This reverts commit 09b6e457d91ce84088e6e21783913e5f1e5bd227.

The reason for the revert is discussed at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839/52

show more ...


# bb6d5fc2 07-Sep-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

Revert "[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell"

This reverts commit c981c533055e14302e7bff5d6898c9308065f665.

The reason for the revert is discussed at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rf

Revert "[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell"

This reverts commit c981c533055e14302e7bff5d6898c9308065f665.

The reason for the revert is discussed at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839/52

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4
# c981c533 29-Aug-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell

This patch and D154984 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

Motivation
----------

D154984 rem

[lit] Improve test output from lit's internal shell

This patch and D154984 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

Motivation
----------

D154984 removes the "Script:" section that lit prints along with a
test's output, and it makes -v and -a imply -vv. For example, after
D154984, the "Script:" section below is never shown, but -v is enough
to produce the execution trace following it:

```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello | FileCheck bogus.txt && echo success
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello"
# command output:
hello

$ "FileCheck" "bogus.txt"
# command stderr:
Could not open check file 'bogus.txt': No such file or directory

error: command failed with exit status: 2

--
```

In the D154984 review, some reviewers point out that they have been
using the "Script:" section for copying and pasting a test's shell
commands to a terminal window. The shell commands as printed in the
execution trace can be harder to copy and paste for the following
reasons:

- They drop redirections and break apart RUN lines at `&&`, `|`, etc.
- They add `$` at the start of every command, which makes it hard to
copy and paste multiple commands in bulk.
- Command stdout, stderr, etc. are interleaved with the commands and
are not clearly delineated.
- They don't always use proper shell quoting. Instead, they blindly
enclose all command-line arguments in double quotes.

Changes
-------

D154984 plus this patch converts the above example into:

```
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
echo hello | FileCheck bogus-file.txt && echo success
# executed command: echo hello
# .---command stdout------------
# | hello
# `-----------------------------
# executed command: FileCheck bogus-file.txt
# .---command stderr------------
# | Could not open check file 'bogus-file.txt': No such file or directory
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 2

--
```

Thus, this patch addresses the above issues as follows:

- The entire execution trace can be copied and pasted in bulk to a
terminal for correct execution of the RUN lines, which are printed
intact as they appeared in the original RUN lines except lit
substitutions are expanded. Everything else in the execution trace
appears in shell comments so it has no effect in a terminal.
- Each of the RUN line's commands is repeated (in shell comments) as
it executes to show (1) that the command actually executed (e.g.,
`echo success` above didn't) and (2) what stdout, stderr, non-zero
exit status, and output files are associated with the command, if
any. Shell quoting in the command is now correct and minimal but is
not necessarily the original shell quoting from the RUN line.
- The start and end of the contents of stdout, stderr, or an output
file is now delineated clearly in the trace.

To help produce some of the above output, this patch extends lit's
internal shell with a built-in `@echo` command. It's like `echo`
except lit suppresses the normal execution trace for `@echo` and just
prints its stdout directly. For now, `@echo` isn't documented for use
in lit tests.

Without this patch, libcxx's custom lit test format tries to parse the
stdout from `lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` (which runs lit's
internal shell) to extract the stdout and stderr produced by shell
commands, and that parse no longer works after the above changes.
This patch makes a small adjustment to
`lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` so libcxx can just request
stdout and stderr without an execution trace.

(As a minor drive-by fix that came up in testing: lit's internal `not`
command now always produces a numeric exit status and never `True`.)

Caveat
------

This patch only makes the above changes for lit's internal shell. In
most cases, we do not know how to force external shells (e.g., bash,
sh, window's `cmd`) to produce execution traces in the manner we want.

To configure a test suite to use lit's internal shell (which is
usually better for test portability than external shells anyway), add
this to the test suite's `lit.cfg` or other configuration file:

```
config.test_format = lit.formats.ShTest(execute_external=False)
```

Reviewed By: MaskRay, awarzynski

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156954

show more ...


# 09b6e457 29-Aug-2023 Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com>

[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv

This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

**Motivation**: -a shows output from al

[lit] Drop "Script:", make -v and -a imply -vv

This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.

**Motivation**: -a shows output from all tests, and -v shows output
from just failed tests. Without this patch, that output from each
test includes a section called "Script:", which includes all shell
commands that lit has computed from RUN directives and will attempt to
run for that test. The effect of -vv (which also implies -v if
neither -a or -v is specified) is to extend that output with shell
commands as they are executing so you can easily see which one failed.

For example, when using lit's internal shell and -vv:

```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello world
: 'RUN: at line 2'; 3c40 hello world
: 'RUN: at line 3'; echo hello world
--
Exit Code: 127

Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello" "world"
hello world

$ ":" "RUN: at line 2"
$ "3c40" "hello" "world"
'3c40': command not found
error: command failed with exit status: 127

--
```

Notice that all shell commands that actually execute appear in the
output twice, once for "Script:" and once for -vv. Especially for
tests with many RUN directives, the result is noisy. When searching
through the output for a particular shell command, it is easy to get
lost and mistake shell commands under "Script:" for shell commands
that actually executed.

**Change**: With this patch, a test's output changes in two ways.
First, the "Script:" section is never shown. Second, omitting -vv no
longer disables printing of shell commands as they execute. That is,
-a and -v imply -vv, and so -vv is deprecated as it is just an alias
for -v.

**Secondary motivation**: We are also working to introduce a PYTHON
directive, which can appear between RUN directives. How should PYTHON
directives be represented in the "Script:" section, which has
previously been just a shell script? We could probably think of
something, but adding info about PYTHON directive execution in the -vv
trace seems more straight-forward and more useful.

(This patch also removes a confusing point in the -vv documentation:
at least when using bash as an external shell, -vv echoes commands to
the shell's stderr not stdout.)

Reviewed By: awarzynski, Endill, ldionne, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154984

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2
# 2f69c82c 07-Aug-2021 Michał Górny <mgorny@moritz.systems>

[llvm] [lit] Support forcing lexical test order

Add a new --order option to choose between available test orders:
the default "smart" order, predictable "lexical" order or "random"
order. Default t

[llvm] [lit] Support forcing lexical test order

Add a new --order option to choose between available test orders:
the default "smart" order, predictable "lexical" order or "random"
order. Default to using lexical order and one job in the lit test
suite.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107695

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# 99d6e05e 08-Apr-2020 Julian Lettner <julian.lettner@apple.com>

[lit] Improve naming of test result categories

Improve consistency when printing test results:
Previously we were using different labels for group names (the header
for the list of, e.g., failing te

[lit] Improve naming of test result categories

Improve consistency when printing test results:
Previously we were using different labels for group names (the header
for the list of, e.g., failing tests) and summary count lines. For
example, "Failing Tests"/"Unexpected Failures". This commit changes lit
to label things consistently.

Improve wording of labels:
When talking about individual test results, the first word in
"Unexpected Failures", "Expected Passes", and "Individual Timeouts" is
superfluous. Some labels contain the word "Tests" and some don't.
Let's simplify the names.

Before:
```
Failing Tests (1):
...

Expected Passes : 3
Unexpected Failures: 1
```

After:
```
Failed Tests (1):
...

Passed: 3
Failed: 1
```

Reviewed By: ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77708

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4
# 41474502 28-Feb-2019 Julian Lettner <julian.lettner@gmail.com>

[lit] Improve test summary output

This change aligns the test summary output along the longest
category label. We also properly align test counts.

Before:
```
Testing Time: 10.30s
Unsupported Te

[lit] Improve test summary output

This change aligns the test summary output along the longest
category label. We also properly align test counts.

Before:
```
Testing Time: 10.30s
Unsupported Tests : 1
Expected Passes : 30
```

After:
```
Testing Time: 10.29s
Unsupported Tests: 1
Expected Passes : 30
```

show more ...


# 1e8900cc 31-Mar-2020 Julian Lettner <julian.lettner@apple.com>

[lit] Fix test that relied on "single process" mode

The shtest-inject test relied on being executed in "single process" mode
and started to fail with a `PicklingError` after it was removed:
```
Ca

[lit] Fix test that relied on "single process" mode

The shtest-inject test relied on being executed in "single process" mode
and started to fail with a `PicklingError` after it was removed:
```
Can't pickle <class 'lit.TestingConfig.CustomFormat'>: attribute
lookup lit.TestingConfig.CustomFormat failed
```

This happened because the test config has to be serialized to the worker
process, but apparently the `CustomFormat` class defined inline is not
serializable.

This change allows passing the tested functionality (preamble_commands)
directly to `lit.formats.ShTest` so we can use it directly in the test.

show more ...


# 8f64b02d 19-Mar-2020 Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com>

[lit] Allow passing extra commands to executeShTest

This allows creating custom test formats on top of `executeShTest` that
inject commands at the beginning of the file being parsed, without
requiri

[lit] Allow passing extra commands to executeShTest

This allows creating custom test formats on top of `executeShTest` that
inject commands at the beginning of the file being parsed, without
requiring these commands to physically appear in the test file itself.

For example, one could define a test format that prints out additional
debug information at the beginning of each test. More realistically,
this has been used to define custom test formats like one that supports
compilation failure tests (e.g. with the extension `compile.fail.cpp`)
by injecting a command that calls the compiler on the file itself and
expects it to fail.

Without this change, the only alternative is to create a temporary file
with the same content as the original test, then prepend the desired
`// RUN:` lines to that file, and call `executeShTest` on that file
instead. This is both slow and cumbersome to do.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76290

show more ...