Reapply "[DomTreeUpdater] Move critical edge splitting code to updater" (#119547)

This relands commit #115111.
Use traditional way to update post dominator tree, i.e. break critical
edge splitting

Reapply "[DomTreeUpdater] Move critical edge splitting code to updater" (#119547)

This relands commit #115111.
Use traditional way to update post dominator tree, i.e. break critical
edge splitting into insert, insert, delete sequence.
When splitting critical edges, the post dominator tree may change its
root node, and `setNewRoot` only works in normal dominator tree...
See

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6c7e5827eda26990e872eb7c3f0d7866ee3c3171/llvm/include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTree.h#L684-L687

show more ...

Revert "[DomTreeUpdater] Move critical edge splitting code to updater" (#119512)

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#115111 Causes #119511

[DomTreeUpdater] Move critical edge splitting code to updater (#115111)

Support critical edge splitting in dominator tree updater. Continue the
work in #100856.

Compile time check:
https://llvm

[DomTreeUpdater] Move critical edge splitting code to updater (#115111)

Support critical edge splitting in dominator tree updater. Continue the
work in #100856.

Compile time check:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=87c35d782795b54911b3e3a91a5b738d4d870e55&to=42b3e5623a9ab4c3648564dc0926b36f3b438a3a&stat=instructions%3Au

show more ...

Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)

Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/

Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)

Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/117907.html,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482, https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489, this
PR attempts to overhaul the `TargetMachine` and `LLVMTargetMachine`
interface classes. More specifically:
1. Makes `TargetMachine` the only class implemented under
`TargetMachine.h` in the `Target` library.
2. `TargetMachine` contains target-specific interface functions that
relate to IR/CodeGen/MC constructs, whereas before (at least on paper)
it was supposed to have only IR/MC constructs. Any Target that doesn't
want to use the independent code generator simply does not implement
them, and returns either `false` or `nullptr`.
3. Renames `LLVMTargetMachine` to `CodeGenCommonTMImpl`. This renaming
aims to make the purpose of `LLVMTargetMachine` clearer. Its interface
was moved under the CodeGen library, to further emphasis its usage in
Targets that use CodeGen directly.
4. Makes `TargetMachine` the only interface used across LLVM and its
projects. With these changes, `CodeGenCommonTMImpl` is simply a set of
shared function implementations of `TargetMachine`, and CodeGen users
don't need to static cast to `LLVMTargetMachine` every time they need a
CodeGen-specific feature of the `TargetMachine`.
5. More importantly, does not change any requirements regarding library
linking.

cc @arsenm @aeubanks

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Rename CATCH/CATCH_ALL to *_LEGACY (#107187)

This renames MIR instruction `CATCH` and `CATCH_ALL` to `CATCH_LEGACY`
and `CATCH_ALL_LEGACY` respectively.

Follow-up PRs for the new E

[WebAssembly] Rename CATCH/CATCH_ALL to *_LEGACY (#107187)

This renames MIR instruction `CATCH` and `CATCH_ALL` to `CATCH_LEGACY`
and `CATCH_ALL_LEGACY` respectively.

Follow-up PRs for the new EH (exnref) implementation will use `CATCH`,
`CATCH_REF`, `CATCH_ALL`, and `CATCH_ALL_REF` as pseudo-instructions
that return extracted values or `exnref` or both, because we don't
currently support block return values in LLVM. So to give the old (real)
`CATCH`es and the new (pseudo) `CATCH`es different names, this attaches
`_LEGACY` prefix to the old names.

This also rearranges `WebAssemblyInstrControl.td` so that the old legacy
instructions are listed all together at the end.

show more ...

[NFC] Remove unused argument (FuncName) for parseMIR (#106144)

While working on a MIR unittest, I noticed that parseMIR includes an
unused argument that sets a function name. This is not only redun

[NFC] Remove unused argument (FuncName) for parseMIR (#106144)

While working on a MIR unittest, I noticed that parseMIR includes an
unused argument that sets a function name. This is not only redundant
but also irrelevant, as parseMIR is designed to parse entire module, not
specific functions, even though most unittests contain a single function
per module. To streamline the API, I have removed this unnecessary
argument from parseMIR. However, if this argument was originally
included to enhance readability or for any other purpose, please let me
know.

show more ...

Revert "[CodeGen] Remove `applySplitCriticalEdges` in `MachineDominatorTree` (#97055)"

This reverts commit c5e5088033fed170068d818c54af6862e449b545.

Causes large compile-time regressions.

[CodeGen] Remove `applySplitCriticalEdges` in `MachineDominatorTree` (#97055)

Summary:
- Remove wrappers in `MachineDominatorTree`.
- Remove `MachineDominatorTree` update code in
`MachineBasicBlo

[CodeGen] Remove `applySplitCriticalEdges` in `MachineDominatorTree` (#97055)

Summary:
- Remove wrappers in `MachineDominatorTree`.
- Remove `MachineDominatorTree` update code in
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge`.
- Use `MachineDomTreeUpdater` in passes which call
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge` and preserve
`MachineDominatorTreeWrapperPass` or CFG analyses.

Commit abea99f65a97248974c02a5544eaf25fc4240056 introduced related
methods in 2014. Now we have SemiNCA based dominator tree in 2017 and
dominator tree updater, the solution adopted here seems a bit outdated.

show more ...

[IR] Don't include Module.h in Analysis.h (NFC) (#97023)

Replace it with a forward declaration instead. Analysis.h is pulled in
by all passes, but not all passes need to access the module.

[CodeGen][NewPM] Split `MachineDominatorTree` into a concrete analysis result (#94571)

Prepare for new pass manager version of `MachineDominatorTreeAnalysis`.
We may need a machine dominator tree v

[CodeGen][NewPM] Split `MachineDominatorTree` into a concrete analysis result (#94571)

Prepare for new pass manager version of `MachineDominatorTreeAnalysis`.
We may need a machine dominator tree version of `DomTreeUpdater` to
handle `SplitCriticalEdge` in some CodeGen passes.

show more ...

[NFC][CodeGen] Change CodeGenOpt::Level/CodeGenFileType into enum classes (#66295)

This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future chang

[NFC][CodeGen] Change CodeGenOpt::Level/CodeGenFileType into enum classes (#66295)

This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.

This matches other nearby enums.

For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::

show more ...

[llvm] Remove redundant string initialization (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-string-init.

[llvm/unittests] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the am

[llvm/unittests] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually us

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.

This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix incorrect grouping and sorting of exceptions

This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to expla

[WebAssembly] Fix incorrect grouping and sorting of exceptions

This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.

---

`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.

---

`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.

This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```

So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.

But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.

---

CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.

`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.

Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.

One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.

So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)

When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.

---

This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.

Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.

Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Update basic EH instructions for the new spec

This implements basic instructions for the new spec.

- Adds new versions of instructions: `catch`, `catch_all`, and `rethrow`
- Adds supp

[WebAssembly] Update basic EH instructions for the new spec

This implements basic instructions for the new spec.

- Adds new versions of instructions: `catch`, `catch_all`, and `rethrow`
- Adds support for instruction selection for the new instructions
- `catch` needs a custom routine for the same reason `throw` needs one,
to encode `__cpp_exception` tag symbol.
- Updates `WebAssembly::isCatch` utility function to include `catch_all`
and Change code that compares an instruction's opcode with `catch` to
use that function.
- LateEHPrepare
- Previously in LateEHPrepare we added `catch` instruction to both
`catchpad`s (for user catches) and `cleanuppad`s (for destructors).
In the new version `catch` is generated from `llvm.catch` intrinsic
in instruction selection phase, so we only need to add `catch_all`
to the beginning of cleanup pads.
- `catch` is generated from instruction selection, but we need to
hoist the `catch` instruction to the beginning of every EH pad,
because `catch` can be in the middle of the EH pad or even in a
split BB from it after various code transformations.
- Removes `addExceptionExtraction` function, which was used to
generate `br_on_exn` before.
- CFGStackfiy: Deletes `fixUnwindMismatches` function. Running this
function on the new instruction causes crashes, and the new version
will be added in a later CL, whose contents will be completely
different. So deleting the whole function will make the diff easier to
read.
- Reenables all disabled tests in exception.ll and eh-lsda.ll and a
single basic test in cfg-stackify-eh.ll.
- Updates existing tests to use the new assembly format. And deletes
`br_on_exn` instructions from the tests and FileCheck lines.

Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94040

show more ...

[NFC] Fix trivial typos in comments

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72143

Patch by Kazuaki Ishizaki.

[WebAssembly] Fix tests missed in rL374235

llvm-svn: 374259

[WebAssembly] Rename except_ref type to exnref

Summary:
We agreed to rename `except_ref` to `exnref` for consistency with other
reference types in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/i

[WebAssembly] Rename except_ref type to exnref

Summary:
We agreed to rename `except_ref` to `exnref` for consistency with other
reference types in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/79. This also
renames WebAssemblyInstrExceptRef.td to WebAssemblyInstrRef.td in order
to use the file for other reference types in future.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64703

llvm-svn: 366145

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Exception handling: Switch to the new proposal

Summary:
This switches the EH implementation to the new proposal:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/master/proposals

[WebAssembly] Exception handling: Switch to the new proposal

Summary:
This switches the EH implementation to the new proposal:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/master/proposals/Exceptions.md
(The previous proposal was
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/master/proposals/old/Exceptions.md)

- Instruction changes
- Now we have one single `catch` instruction that returns a except_ref
value
- `throw` now can take variable number of operations
- `rethrow` does not have 'depth' argument anymore
- `br_on_exn` queries an except_ref to see if it matches the tag and
branches to the given label if true.
- `extract_exception` is a pseudo instruction that simulates popping
values from wasm stack. This is to make `br_on_exn`, a very special
instruction, work: `br_on_exn` puts values onto the stack only if it
is taken, and the # of values can vay depending on the tag.

- Now there's only one `catch` per `try`, this patch removes all special
handling for terminate pad with a call to `__clang_call_terminate`.
Before it was the only case there are two catch clauses (a normal
`catch` and `catch_all` per `try`).

- Make `rethrow` act as a terminator like `throw`. This splits BB after
`rethrow` in WasmEHPrepare, and deletes an unnecessary `unreachable`
after `rethrow` in LateEHPrepare.

- Now we stop at all catchpads (because we add wasm `catch` instruction
that catches all exceptions), this creates new
`findWasmUnwindDestinations` function in SelectionDAGBuilder.

- Now we use `br_on_exn` instrution to figure out if an except_ref
matches the current tag or not, LateEHPrepare generates this sequence
for catch pads:
```
catch
block i32
br_on_exn $__cpp_exception
end_block
extract_exception
```

- Branch analysis for `br_on_exn` in WebAssemblyInstrInfo

- Other various misc. changes to switch to the new proposal.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57134

llvm-svn: 352598

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

MachineModuleInfo: Store more specific reference to LLVMTargetMachine; NFC

MachineModuleInfo can only be used in code using lib/CodeGen, hence we
can keep a more specific reference to LLVMTargetMach

MachineModuleInfo: Store more specific reference to LLVMTargetMachine; NFC

MachineModuleInfo can only be used in code using lib/CodeGen, hence we
can keep a more specific reference to LLVMTargetMachine rather than just
TargetMachine around.

llvm-svn: 346182

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Add WebAssemblyException information analysis

Summary:
A WebAssemblyException object contains BBs that belong to a 'catch' part
of the try-catch-end structure. Because CFGSort requires

[WebAssembly] Add WebAssemblyException information analysis

Summary:
A WebAssemblyException object contains BBs that belong to a 'catch' part
of the try-catch-end structure. Because CFGSort requires all the BBs
within a catch part to be sorted together as it does for loops, this
pass calculates the nesting structure of catch part of exceptions in a
function. Now this assumes the use of Windows EH instructions.

Reviewers: dschuff, majnemer

Subscribers: jfb, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44134

llvm-svn: 335439

show more ...