Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4 |
|
#
fa0cf3d3 |
| 13-Nov-2024 |
Daniel Paoliello <danpao@microsoft.com> |
[llvm][aarch64] Fix Arm64EC name mangling algorithm (#115567)
Arm64EC uses a special name mangling mode that adds `$$h` between the
symbol name and its type. In MSVC's name mangling `@` is used to
[llvm][aarch64] Fix Arm64EC name mangling algorithm (#115567)
Arm64EC uses a special name mangling mode that adds `$$h` between the
symbol name and its type. In MSVC's name mangling `@` is used to
separate the name and type BUT it is also used for other purposes, such
as the separator between paths in a fully qualified name.
The original algorithm was quite fragile and made assumptions that
didn't hold true for all MSVC mangled symbols, so instead of trying to
improve this algorithm we are now using the demangler to indicate where
the insertion point should be (i.e., to parse the fully-qualified name
and return the current string offset).
Also fixed `isArm64ECMangledFunctionName` to search for `@$$h` since the
`$$h` must always be after a `@`.
Fixes #115231
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0 |
|
#
459a82e6 |
| 13-Sep-2024 |
JOE1994 <joseph942010@gmail.com> |
[llvm][unittests] Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush() (NFC)
raw_string_ostream::flush() is essentially a no-op (also specified in docs). Don't call it in tests that aren't meant to test 'raw_stri
[llvm][unittests] Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush() (NFC)
raw_string_ostream::flush() is essentially a no-op (also specified in docs). Don't call it in tests that aren't meant to test 'raw_string_ostream' itself.
p.s. remove a few redundant calls to raw_string_ostream::str()
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3 |
|
#
5fb2797f |
| 20-Mar-2024 |
Neumann Hon <neumann.hon@ibm.com> |
[GOFF][z/OS] Change PrivateGlobalPrefix and PrivateLabelPrefix to be L# (#85730)
The current values for PrivateGlobalPrefix and PrivateLabelPrefix (@@
and @ respectively) are, in hindsight, poor ch
[GOFF][z/OS] Change PrivateGlobalPrefix and PrivateLabelPrefix to be L# (#85730)
The current values for PrivateGlobalPrefix and PrivateLabelPrefix (@@
and @ respectively) are, in hindsight, poor choices for multiple
reasons:
First, there exist externally visible routines from the language
environment that begin with @@. These functions are certainly not
local/private by any means and they should not share a prefix with
private globals.
Secondly, both private globals and private labels should be handled the
same way by GOFF, so it doesn't make much sense for them to have
separate prefixes. GOFF remains the only file format where these are
different and there is no reason for that to be the case
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
e09a1dc4 |
| 24-Sep-2021 |
Anirudh Prasad <anirudh_prasad@hotmail.com> |
[SystemZ][z/OS] Add GOFF Support to the DataLayout
- This patch adds in the GOFF mangling support to the LLVM data layout string. A corresponding additional line has been added into the data layout
[SystemZ][z/OS] Add GOFF Support to the DataLayout
- This patch adds in the GOFF mangling support to the LLVM data layout string. A corresponding additional line has been added into the data layout section in the language reference documentation. - Furthermore, this patch also sets the right data layout string for the z/OS target in the SystemZ backend.
Reviewed By: uweigand, Kai, abhina.sreeskantharajan, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3 |
|
#
572dde55 |
| 02-Jul-2020 |
jasonliu <jasonliu.development@gmail.com> |
[XCOFF][AIX] Use 'L..' instead of '.L' for getPrivateGlobalPrefix in DataLayout
Summary: D80831 changed part of the prefix usage for AIX. But there are other places getting prefix from DataLayout. T
[XCOFF][AIX] Use 'L..' instead of '.L' for getPrivateGlobalPrefix in DataLayout
Summary: D80831 changed part of the prefix usage for AIX. But there are other places getting prefix from DataLayout. This patch intends to make prefix usage consistent on AIX.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81270
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1 |
|
#
f8b51c5f |
| 16-Mar-2018 |
Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com> |
[IR] Avoid the need to prefix MS C++ symbols with '\01'
Now the Windows mangling modes ('w' and 'x') do not do any mangling for symbols starting with '?'. This means that clang can stop adding the h
[IR] Avoid the need to prefix MS C++ symbols with '\01'
Now the Windows mangling modes ('w' and 'x') do not do any mangling for symbols starting with '?'. This means that clang can stop adding the hideous '\01' leading escape. This means LLVM debug logs are less likely to contain ASCII escape characters and it will be easier to copy and paste MS symbol names from IR.
Finally.
For non-Windows platforms, names starting with '?' still get IR mangling, so once clang stops escaping MS C++ names, we will get extra '_' prefixing on MachO. That's fine, since it is currently impossible to construct a triple that uses the MS C++ ABI in clang and emits macho object files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7775
llvm-svn: 327734
show more ...
|