Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4 |
|
#
0bd51308 |
| 28-Aug-2024 |
Tim Besard <tim.besard@gmail.com> |
[LLVM][C API] Clearing initializer and personality by passing NULL (#105521)
This is similar to how the C++ API supports passing `nullptr` to
`setPersonalityFn` or `setInitializer`.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2 |
|
#
9f75270c |
| 30-Jul-2024 |
Alexis Engelke <engelke@in.tum.de> |
[IR] Add per-function numbers to basic blocks (#101052)
Every basic block that is linked into a function now has a unique
number, which can be queried using getNumber(). Numbers are densely
alloca
[IR] Add per-function numbers to basic blocks (#101052)
Every basic block that is linked into a function now has a unique
number, which can be queried using getNumber(). Numbers are densely
allocated, but not re-assigned on block removal for stability. Block
numbers are intended to be fairly stable and only be updated when
removing a several basic blocks to make sure the numbering doesn't
become too sparse.
To reduce holes in the numbering, renumberBlocks() can be called to
re-assign numbers in block order.
Additionally, getMaxBlockNumber() returns a value larger than the
largest block number, intended to pre-allocate/resize vectors.
Furthermore, this introduces the concept of a "block number epoch" --
an integer that changes after every renumbering. This is useful for
identifying use of block numbers after renumbering: on initialization,
the current epoch is stored, and on all subsequent accesses, equality
with the current epoch can be asserted.
I added a validate method to catch cases where something goes wrong,
even if I can't really imagine how invalid numbers can occur. But I
think it's better to be safe and rule out this potential source of bugs
when more things depend on the numbering.
Previous discussion in:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-auxiliary-field-for-per-pass-custom-data-to-basicblock/80229
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7 |
|
#
ab08df22 |
| 02-Jun-2024 |
Joshua Cao <cao.joshua@yahoo.com> |
[IR] Do not set `none` for function uwtable (#93387)
This avoids the pitfall where we set the uwtable to none:
```
func.setUWTableKind(llvm::UWTableKind::None)
```
`Attribute::getAsString()` wou
[IR] Do not set `none` for function uwtable (#93387)
This avoids the pitfall where we set the uwtable to none:
```
func.setUWTableKind(llvm::UWTableKind::None)
```
`Attribute::getAsString()` would see an unknown attribute and fail an
assertion. In this patch, we assert that we do not see a None uwtable
kind.
This also skips the check of `UWTableKind::Async`. It is dominated by
the check of `UWTableKind::Default`, which has the same enum value
(nfc).
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
#
80f2f1ea |
| 14-Dec-2022 |
Vasileios Porpodas <vporpodas@google.com> |
[NFC] Rename Function::insertBasicBlockAt() to Function::insert().
I think this is a better name because it is what STL uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140068
|
#
c2355b36 |
| 14-Dec-2022 |
Vasileios Porpodas <vporpodas@google.com> |
[IR] Adds Function::erase() for erasing a range of basic blocks
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.
[IR] Adds Function::erase() for erasing a range of basic blocks
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140064
show more ...
|
#
9eb5d9cb |
| 14-Dec-2022 |
Vasileios Porpodas <vporpodas@google.com> |
[NFC] Fix warnings in EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build
|
#
7b684119 |
| 13-Dec-2022 |
Vasileios Porpodas <vporpodas@google.com> |
[IR] Adds Function::splice() member functions
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139982
|
#
a19ae77d |
| 12-Dec-2022 |
Vasileios Porpodas <vporpodas@google.com> |
[IR][NFC] Adds Function::insertBasicBlockAt() to replace things like F->getBasicBlockList().insert()
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Di
[IR][NFC] Adds Function::insertBasicBlockAt() to replace things like F->getBasicBlockList().insert()
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139906
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
f26bdb53 |
| 17-May-2020 |
Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com> |
Make Value::getPointerAlignment() return an Align, not a MaybeAlign.
If we don't know anything about the alignment of a pointer, Align(1) is still correct: all pointers are at least 1-byte aligned.
Make Value::getPointerAlignment() return an Align, not a MaybeAlign.
If we don't know anything about the alignment of a pointer, Align(1) is still correct: all pointers are at least 1-byte aligned.
Included in this patch is a bugfix for an issue discovered during this cleanup: pointers with "dereferenceable" attributes/metadata were assumed to be aligned according to the type of the pointer. This wasn't intentional, as far as I can tell, so Loads.cpp was fixed to stop making this assumption. Frontends may need to be updated. I updated clang's handling of C++ references, and added a release note for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80072
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
bae629b9 |
| 15-Oct-2019 |
Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com> |
[Alignment][NFC] Value::getPointerAlignment returns MaybeAlign
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail
[Alignment][NFC] Value::getPointerAlignment returns MaybeAlign
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68398
llvm-svn: 374889
show more ...
|
#
0e62011d |
| 15-Oct-2019 |
Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com> |
[Alignment][NFC] Remove dependency on GlobalObject::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.o
[Alignment][NFC] Remove dependency on GlobalObject::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68944
llvm-svn: 374880
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
01dcdcdd |
| 01-Aug-2019 |
Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com> |
[IR] Add getArg() method to Function class
Adds a method which, when called with function.getArg(i), returns an Argument* to the i'th argument.
Patch by Henry Wildermuth
Differential Revision: htt
[IR] Add getArg() method to Function class
Adds a method which, when called with function.getArg(i), returns an Argument* to the i'th argument.
Patch by Henry Wildermuth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64925
llvm-svn: 367576
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5 |
|
#
308e82ec |
| 08-Mar-2019 |
Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com> |
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
ll
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355685
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
92dd321a |
| 07-Mar-2019 |
Mitch Phillips <mitchphillips@outlook.com> |
Rollback of rL355585.
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:
``` ================================================================= ==2453==ERROR
Rollback of rL355585.
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:
``` ================================================================= ==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105 #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19 #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12 #3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136 #4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105 #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29 #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241 #3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16 #4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136 #5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.
Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr: ``` ==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44 #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78 #3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9 #4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314 #5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18 #6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User ```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.
llvm-svn: 355616
show more ...
|
#
fd4156ed |
| 07-Mar-2019 |
Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com> |
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
ll
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355585
show more ...
|
#
318028f0 |
| 06-Mar-2019 |
Mitch Phillips <mitchphillips@outlook.com> |
Revert "[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout"
This reverts commit 2391bfca97290181ae65796ea6da135d1b6d037b.
This reverts rL355522 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335).
Kills buildbo
Revert "[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout"
This reverts commit 2391bfca97290181ae65796ea6da135d1b6d037b.
This reverts rL355522 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335).
Kills buildbots that use '-Werror' with the following error: /var/lib/buildbot/sanitizer-buildbot6/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/build/llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp:657:7: error: default label in switch which covers all enumeration values [-Werror,-Wcovered-switch-default]
See buildbots http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30200/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.
llvm-svn: 355537
show more ...
|
#
2391bfca |
| 06-Mar-2019 |
Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com> |
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
ll
[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355522
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
5e1e5918 |
| 15-Feb-2017 |
Keno Fischer <keno@alumni.harvard.edu> |
[GlobalObject] Fix setSection("")
Summary: In rL291613, the section name was interned in LLVMContext. However, this broke the ability to remove the section from a GlobalObject, because it tried to i
[GlobalObject] Fix setSection("")
Summary: In rL291613, the section name was interned in LLVMContext. However, this broke the ability to remove the section from a GlobalObject, because it tried to intern empty strings, which is not allowed. Fix that and add an appropriate regression test.
Reviewed By: rnk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29795
llvm-svn: 295238
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1 |
|
#
ab4622cb |
| 13-Jul-2016 |
Justin Lebar <jlebar@google.com> |
Fix warnings in FunctionTest.cpp.
Because of the goop involved in the EXPECT_EQ macro, we were getting the following warning
expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context
Fix warnings in FunctionTest.cpp.
Because of the goop involved in the EXPECT_EQ macro, we were getting the following warning
expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context
because the "I++" was being used inside of a template type:
switch (0) case 0: default: if (const ::testing::AssertionResult gtest_ar = (::testing::internal:: EqHelper<(sizeof(::testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(Args[I++])) == 1)>::Compare("Args[I++]", "&A", Args[I++], &A))) ; else ::testing::internal::AssertHelper(::testing::TestPartResult::kNonFatalFailure, "../src/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp", 94, gtest_ar.failure_message()) = ::testing::Message();
llvm-svn: 275291
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
#
bdfc9846 |
| 06-Apr-2016 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com> |
IRMover: Steal arguments when moving functions, NFC
Instead of copying arguments from the source function to the destination, steal them. This has a few advantages.
- The ValueMap doesn't need t
IRMover: Steal arguments when moving functions, NFC
Instead of copying arguments from the source function to the destination, steal them. This has a few advantages.
- The ValueMap doesn't need to be seeded with (or cleared of) Arguments.
- Often the destination function won't have created any arguments yet, so this avoids malloc traffic.
- Argument names don't need to be copied.
Because argument lists are lazy, this required a new Function::stealArgumentListFrom helper.
llvm-svn: 265519
show more ...
|