Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4 |
|
#
bb3f5e1f |
| 14-Nov-2024 |
Matin Raayai <30674652+matinraayai@users.noreply.github.com> |
Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)
Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/
Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)
Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/117907.html,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482, https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489, this
PR attempts to overhaul the `TargetMachine` and `LLVMTargetMachine`
interface classes. More specifically:
1. Makes `TargetMachine` the only class implemented under
`TargetMachine.h` in the `Target` library.
2. `TargetMachine` contains target-specific interface functions that
relate to IR/CodeGen/MC constructs, whereas before (at least on paper)
it was supposed to have only IR/MC constructs. Any Target that doesn't
want to use the independent code generator simply does not implement
them, and returns either `false` or `nullptr`.
3. Renames `LLVMTargetMachine` to `CodeGenCommonTMImpl`. This renaming
aims to make the purpose of `LLVMTargetMachine` clearer. Its interface
was moved under the CodeGen library, to further emphasis its usage in
Targets that use CodeGen directly.
4. Makes `TargetMachine` the only interface used across LLVM and its
projects. With these changes, `CodeGenCommonTMImpl` is simply a set of
shared function implementations of `TargetMachine`, and CodeGen users
don't need to static cast to `LLVMTargetMachine` every time they need a
CodeGen-specific feature of the `TargetMachine`.
5. More importantly, does not change any requirements regarding library
linking.
cc @arsenm @aeubanks
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5 |
|
#
6ea0c0a2 |
| 30-Apr-2024 |
paperchalice <liujunchang97@outlook.com> |
[NewPM][CodeGen] Add `MachineFunctionAnalysis` (#88610)
In new pass system, `MachineFunction` could be an analysis result again,
machine module pass can now fetch them from analysis manager.
`Mach
[NewPM][CodeGen] Add `MachineFunctionAnalysis` (#88610)
In new pass system, `MachineFunction` could be an analysis result again,
machine module pass can now fetch them from analysis manager.
`MachineModuleInfo` no longer owns them.
Remove `FreeMachineFunctionPass`, replaced by
`InvalidateAnalysisPass<MachineFunctionAnalysis>`.
Now `FreeMachineFunction` is replaced by
`InvalidateAnalysisPass<MachineFunctionAnalysis>`, the workaround in
`MachineFunctionPassManager` is no longer needed, there is no difference
between `unittests/MIR/PassBuilderCallbacksTest.cpp` and
`unittests/IR/PassBuilderCallbacksTest.cpp`.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.4 |
|
#
f6ca37bf |
| 13-Apr-2024 |
paperchalice <liujunchang97@outlook.com> |
[NewPM] Set diagnostic handler in `MachineModuleAnalysis` (#88229)
`setDiagnosticHandler` is idempotent.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4 |
|
#
91e9e317 |
| 22-Feb-2024 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
[NewPM/CodeGen] Rewrite pass manager nesting (#81068)
Currently the new PM infra for codegen puts everything into a
MachineFunctionPassManager. The MachineFunctionPassManager owns both
Module pass
[NewPM/CodeGen] Rewrite pass manager nesting (#81068)
Currently the new PM infra for codegen puts everything into a
MachineFunctionPassManager. The MachineFunctionPassManager owns both
Module passes and MachineFunction passes, and batches adjacent
MachineFunction passes like a typical PassManager.
The current MachineFunctionAnalysisManager also directly references a
module and function analysis manager to get results.
The initial argument was that the codegen pipeline is relatively "flat",
meaning it's mostly machine function passes with a couple of module
passes here and there. However, there are a couple of issues with this
as compared to a more structured nesting more like the optimization
pipeline. For example, it doesn't allow running function passes then
machine function passes on a function and its machine function all at
once. It also currently requires the caller to split out the IR passes
into one pass manager and the MIR passes into another pass manager.
This patch rewrites the new pass manager infra for the codegen pipeline
to be more similar to the nesting in the optimization pipeline.
Basically, a Function contains a MachineFunction. So we can have Module
-> Function -> MachineFunction adaptors. It also rewrites the analysis
managers to have inner/outer proxies like the ones in the optimization
pipeline. The new pass managers/adaptors/analysis managers can be seen
in use in PassManagerTest.cpp.
This allows us to consolidate to just having to add to one
ModulePassManager when using the codegen pipeline.
I haven't added the Function -> MachineFunction adaptor in this patch,
but it should be added when we merge AddIRPass/AddMachinePass so that we
can run IR and MIR passes on a function before proceeding to the next
function.
The MachineFunctionProperties infra for MIR verification is still WIP.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3 |
|
#
bb531c9a |
| 07-Feb-2024 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
[NewPM/Codegen] Move MachineModuleInfo ownership outside of analysis (#80937)
With the legacy pass manager, MachineModuleInfoWrapperPass owned the
MachineModuleInfo used in the codegen pipeline. It
[NewPM/Codegen] Move MachineModuleInfo ownership outside of analysis (#80937)
With the legacy pass manager, MachineModuleInfoWrapperPass owned the
MachineModuleInfo used in the codegen pipeline. It can do this since
it's an ImmutablePass that doesn't get invalidated.
However, with the new pass manager, it is legal for the
ModuleAnalysisManager to clear all of its analyses, regardless of if the
analysis does not want to be invalidated. So we must move ownership of
the MachineModuleInfo outside of the analysis (this is similar to
PassInstrumentation). For now, make the PassBuilder user register a
MachineModuleAnalysis that returns a reference to a MachineModuleInfo
that the user owns. Perhaps we can find a better place to own the
MachineModuleInfo to make using the codegen pass manager less cumbersome
in the future.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
d768bf99 |
| 10-Feb-2023 |
Archibald Elliott <archibald.elliott@arm.com> |
[NFC][TargetParser] Replace uses of llvm/Support/Host.h
The forwarding header is left in place because of its use in `polly/lib/External/isl/interface/extract_interface.cc`, but I have added a GCC w
[NFC][TargetParser] Replace uses of llvm/Support/Host.h
The forwarding header is left in place because of its use in `polly/lib/External/isl/interface/extract_interface.cc`, but I have added a GCC warning about the fact it is deprecated, because it is used in `isl` from where it is included by Polly.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
62c7f035 |
| 07-Feb-2023 |
Archibald Elliott <archibald.elliott@arm.com> |
[NFC][TargetParser] Remove llvm/ADT/Triple.h
I also ran `git clang-format` to get the headers in the right order for the new location, which has changed the order of other headers in two files.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
#
b6a01caa |
| 03-Dec-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[llvm/unittests] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce the am
[llvm/unittests] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
#
989f1c72 |
| 15-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-in
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
a278250b |
| 10-Mar-2022 |
Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org> |
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https:/
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
show more ...
|
#
7f230fee |
| 07-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
89b57061 |
| 08-Oct-2021 |
Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com> |
Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack. Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to actually us
Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack. Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
5bbf1fea |
| 21-May-2021 |
Igor Kudrin <ikudrin@accesssoftek.com> |
[unittests][CodeGen] Mark tests that cannot be executed with GTEST_SKIP()
This helps to distinguish such tests from successfully passed ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102754
|
#
6f713100 |
| 07-May-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
[NewPM] Move analysis invalidation/clearing logging to instrumentation
We're trying to move DebugLogging into instrumentation, rather than being part of PassManagers/AnalysisManagers.
Reviewed By:
[NewPM] Move analysis invalidation/clearing logging to instrumentation
We're trying to move DebugLogging into instrumentation, rather than being part of PassManagers/AnalysisManagers.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102093
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
f5b5ccf2 |
| 07-Aug-2020 |
Yuanfang Chen <yuanfang.chen@sony.com> |
Reland "Revert "[NewPM][CodeGen] Introduce machine pass and machine pass manager""
This relands commit 320eab2d558fde0b61437e9b9075bfd301c2c474.
The test failed because it was looking for x86-linux
Reland "Revert "[NewPM][CodeGen] Introduce machine pass and machine pass manager""
This relands commit 320eab2d558fde0b61437e9b9075bfd301c2c474.
The test failed because it was looking for x86-linux target unconditionally. Now it gets the default target.
show more ...
|
#
911565d1 |
| 07-Aug-2020 |
Yuanfang Chen <yuanfang.chen@sony.com> |
[NewPM][CodeGen] Introduce machine pass and machine pass manager
machine pass could define four methods: - `PreservedAnalyses run(MachineFunction &, MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &)` - `Error doIni
[NewPM][CodeGen] Introduce machine pass and machine pass manager
machine pass could define four methods: - `PreservedAnalyses run(MachineFunction &, MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &)` - `Error doInitialization(Module &, MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &)` - `Error doFinalization(Module &, MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &)` - `Error run(Module &, MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &)`
machine pass manger: - MachineFunctionAnalysisManager: Basically an AnalysisManager<MachineFunction> augmented with the ability to register and query IR analyses - MachineFunctionPassManager: support only two methods, `addPass` and `run`
Reviewed By: arsenm, asbirlea, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67687
show more ...
|