History log of /llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-mca/CodeRegionGenerator.h (Results 1 – 14 of 14)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6
# 1de0535e 07-May-2024 Peter Waller <peter.waller@arm.com>

[llvm-mca] Abort on parse error without -skip-unsupported-instructions (#90474)

[llvm-mca] Abort on parse error without -skip-unsupported-instructions

Prior to this patch, llvm-mca would continue

[llvm-mca] Abort on parse error without -skip-unsupported-instructions (#90474)

[llvm-mca] Abort on parse error without -skip-unsupported-instructions

Prior to this patch, llvm-mca would continue executing after parse
errors. These errors can lead to some confusion since some analysis
results are printed on the standard output, and they're printed after
the errors, which could otherwise be easy to miss.

However it is still useful to be able to continue analysis after errors;
so extend the recently added -skip-unsupported-instructions to support
this.

Two tests which have parse errors for some of the 'RUN' branches are
updated to use -skip-unsupported-instructions so they can remain as-is.

Add a description of -skip-unsupported-instructions to the llvm-mca
command guide, and add it to the llvm-mca --help output:

```
--skip-unsupported-instructions=<value> - Force analysis to continue in the presence of unsupported instructions
=none - Exit with an error when an instruction is unsupported for any reason (default)
=lack-sched - Skip instructions on input which lack scheduling information
=parse-failure - Skip lines on the input which fail to parse for any reason
=any - Skip instructions or lines on input which are unsupported for any reason
```

Tests within this patch are intended to cover each of the cases.

Reason | Flag | Comment
--------------|------|-------
none | none | Usual case, existing test suite
lack-sched | none | Advises user to use -skip-unsupported-instructions=lack-sched, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/X86/BtVer2/unsupported-instruction.s
parse-failure | none | Advises user to use -skip-unsupported-instructions=parse-failure, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/bad-input.s
any | none | (N/A, covered above)
lack-sched | any | Continues, prints warnings, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/X86/BtVer2/unsupported-instruction.s
parse-failure | any | Continues, prints errors, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/bad-input.s
lack-sched | parse-failure | Advises user to use -skip-unsupported-instructions=lack-sched, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/X86/BtVer2/unsupported-instruction.s
parse-failure | lack-sched | Advises user to use -skip-unsupported-instructions=parse-failure, tested in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/bad-input.s
none | * | This would be any test case with skip-unsupported-instructions, coverage added in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/X86/BtVer2/simple-test.s
any | * | (Logically covered by the other cases)

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init
# ecf372f9 05-Jul-2023 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

[llvm-mca][RISCV] vsetivli and vsetvli act as instruments

Since the LMUL data that is needed to create an instrument is
avaliable statically from vsetivli and vsetvli instructions,
LMUL instruments

[llvm-mca][RISCV] vsetivli and vsetvli act as instruments

Since the LMUL data that is needed to create an instrument is
avaliable statically from vsetivli and vsetvli instructions,
LMUL instruments can be automatically generated so that clients
of the tool do no need to manually insert instrument comments.

Instrument comments may be placed after a vset{i}vli instruction,
which will override instrument that was automatically inserted.
As a result, clients of llvm-mca instruments do not need to update
their existing instrument comments. However, if the instrument
has the same LMUL as the vset{i}vli, then it is reccomended to
remove the instrument comment as it becomes redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154526

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.6
# 87709b71 03-Jun-2023 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[llvm-mca] Modernize MCACommentConsumer (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6
# c7631606 22-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

[llvm-mca] Fix class dominance warnings for parseCodeRegions

Fixes issue [59091](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59091).

`CodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegions` is implemented by `AsmCo

[llvm-mca] Fix class dominance warnings for parseCodeRegions

Fixes issue [59091](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59091).

`CodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegions` is implemented by `AsmCodeRegionGenerator`.
If it were to be implemented in `AnalysisRegionGenerator` or `InstrumentRegionGenerator`,
then `parseCodeRegions` from an `AsmAnalysisRegionGenerator` or `AsmInstrumentRegionGenerator`
object would be ambiguous. To solve this, `AsmAnalysisRegionGenerator` and
`AsmInstrumentRegionGenerator` qualify their call to `AsmCodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegions`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138462

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.5
# 98e342dc 04-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example,

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example, VADD.I16 q0, q1, q2 is a neon instruction that operates on 16-bit integer
elements stored in 128-bit Q registers, which leads to eight 16-bit lanes in parallel. This kind
of information impacts how the instruction takes to execute and what dependencies this may cause.

On RISCV however, the data that impacts scheduling is encoded in CSR registers such as vtype or
vl, in addition with the instruction itself. But MCA does not track or use the data in these
registers. This patch fixes this problem by introducing Instruments into MCA.

* Replace `CodeRegions` with `AnalysisRegions`
* Add `Instrument` and `InstrumentManager`
* Add `InstrumentRegions`
* Add RISCV Instrument and `InstrumentManager`
* Parse `Instruments` in driver
* Use instruments to override schedule class
* RISCV use lmul instrument to override schedule class
* Fix unit tests to pass empty instruments
* Add -ignore-im clopt to disable this change

A prior version of this patch was commited in 5e82ee537321. 2323a4ee610f reverted
that change because the unit test files caused build errors. The change with fixes
were committed in b88b8307bf9e but reverted once again e8e92c8313a0 due to more
build errors.

This commit adds the prior changes and fixes the build error.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137440

show more ...


# e8e92c83 16-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

Revert "[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV"

This reverts commit b88b8307bf9e24f53e7ef3052abf2c506ff55fd2.


# b88b8307 04-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example,

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example, VADD.I16 q0, q1, q2 is a neon instruction that operates on 16-bit integer
elements stored in 128-bit Q registers, which leads to eight 16-bit lanes in parallel. This kind
of information impacts how the instruction takes to execute and what dependencies this may cause.

On RISCV however, the data that impacts scheduling is encoded in CSR registers such as vtype or
vl, in addition with the instruction itself. But MCA does not track or use the data in these
registers. This patch fixes this problem by introducing Instruments into MCA.

* Replace `CodeRegions` with `AnalysisRegions`
* Add `Instrument` and `InstrumentManager`
* Add `InstrumentRegions`
* Add RISCV Instrument and `InstrumentManager`
* Parse `Instruments` in driver
* Use instruments to override schedule class
* RISCV use lmul instrument to override schedule class
* Fix unit tests to pass empty instruments
* Add -ignore-im clopt to disable this change

A prior version of this patch was commited in. It was reverted in
5e82ee5373211db8522181054800ccd49461d9d8. 2323a4ee610f5e1db74d362af4c6fb8c704be8f6 reverted
that change because the unit test files caused build errors. This commit adds the original changes
and the fixed test files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137440

show more ...


# 2323a4ee 15-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

Revert "[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV"

This reverts commit 5e82ee5373211db8522181054800ccd49461d9d8.


# 5e82ee53 04-Nov-2022 Michael Maitland <michaeltmaitland@gmail.com>

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example,

[RISCV][llvm-mca] Use LMUL Instruments to provide more accurate reports on RISCV

On x86 and AArch, SIMD instructions encode all of the scheduling information in the instruction
itself. For example, VADD.I16 q0, q1, q2 is a neon instruction that operates on 16-bit integer
elements stored in 128-bit Q registers, which leads to eight 16-bit lanes in parallel. This kind
of information impacts how the instruction takes to execute and what dependencies this may cause.

On RISCV however, the data that impacts scheduling is encoded in CSR registers such as vtype or
vl, in addition with the instruction itself. But MCA does not track or use the data in these
registers. This patch fixes this problem by introducing Instruments into MCA.

* Replace `CodeRegions` with `AnalysisRegions`
* Add `Instrument` and `InstrumentManager`
* Add `InstrumentRegions`
* Add RISCV Instrument and `InstrumentManager`
* Parse `Instruments` in driver
* Use instruments to override schedule class
* RISCV use lmul instrument to override schedule class
* Fix unit tests to pass empty instruments
* Add -ignore-im clopt to disable this change

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137440

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 89b57061 08-Oct-2021 Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually us

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.

This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init
# dbed061b 25-Jul-2021 Patrick Holland <patrickeholland@gmail.com>

[MCA] Moving the target specific CustomBehaviour impl. from /tools/llvm-mca/ to /lib/Target/.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106775


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1
# e5d59db4 19-May-2021 Patrick Holland <patrickeholland@gmail.com>

[MCA] llvm-mca MCTargetStreamer segfault fix

In order to create the code regions for llvm-mca to analyze, llvm-mca creates an
AsmCodeRegionGenerator and calls AsmCodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegion

[MCA] llvm-mca MCTargetStreamer segfault fix

In order to create the code regions for llvm-mca to analyze, llvm-mca creates an
AsmCodeRegionGenerator and calls AsmCodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegions().
Within this function, both an MCAsmParser and MCTargetAsmParser are created so
that MCAsmParser::Run() can be used to create the code regions for us.

These parser classes were created for llvm-mc so they are designed to emit code
with an MCStreamer and MCTargetStreamer that are expected to be setup and passed
into the MCAsmParser constructor. Because llvm-mca doesn’t want to emit any
code, an MCStreamerWrapper class gets created instead and passed into the
MCAsmParser constructor. This wrapper inherits from MCStreamer and overrides
many of the emit methods to just do nothing. The exception is the
emitInstruction() method which calls Regions.addInstruction(Inst).

This works well and allows llvm-mca to utilize llvm-mc’s MCAsmParser to build
our code regions, however there are a few directives which rely on the
MCTargetStreamer. llvm-mc assumes that the MCStreamer that gets passed into the
MCAsmParser’s constructor has a valid pointer to an MCTargetStreamer. Because
llvm-mca doesn’t setup an MCTargetStreamer, when the parser encounters one of
those directives, a segfault will occur.

In x86, each one of these 7 directives will cause this segfault if they exist in
the input assembly to llvm-mca:

.cv_fpo_proc
.cv_fpo_setframe
.cv_fpo_pushreg
.cv_fpo_stackalloc
.cv_fpo_stackalign
.cv_fpo_endprologue
.cv_fpo_endproc
I haven’t looked at other targets, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the
other ones also have certain directives which could result in this same
segfault.

My proposed solution is to simply initialize an MCTargetStreamer after we
initialize the MCStreamerWrapper. The MCTargetStreamer requires an ostream
object, but we don’t actually want any of these directives to be emitted
anywhere, so I use an ostream created with the nulls() function. Since this
needs to happen after the MCStreamerWrapper has been initialized, it needs to
happen within the AsmCodeRegionGenerator::parseCodeRegions() function. The
MCTargetStreamer also needs an MCInstPrinter which is easiest to initialize
within the main() function of llvm-mca. So this MCInstPrinter gets constructed
within main() then passed into the parseCodeRegions() function as a parameter.
(If you feel like it would be appropriate and possible to create the
MCInstPrinter within the parseCodeRegions() function, then feel free to modify
my solution. That would stop us from having to pass it into the function and
would limit its scope / lifetime.)

My solution stops the segfault from happening and still passes all of the
current (expected) llvm-mca tests. I also added a new test for x86 that checks
for this segfault on an input that includes one of the .cv_fpo directives (this
test fails without my solution, but passes with it).

As far as I can tell, all of the functions that I modified are only called from
within llvm-mca so there shouldn’t be any worries about breaking other tools.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102709

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3
# 23f7106e 07-Nov-2018 Matt Davis <Matthew.Davis@sony.com>

[llvm-mca] Move the AssembleInput logic into its own class.

Summary:
This patch introduces a CodeRegionGenerator class which is responsible for parsing some type of input and creating a 'CodeRegions

[llvm-mca] Move the AssembleInput logic into its own class.

Summary:
This patch introduces a CodeRegionGenerator class which is responsible for parsing some type of input and creating a 'CodeRegions' instance for use by llvm-mca. In the future, we will also have a CodeRegionGenerator subclass for converting an input object file into CodeRegions. For now, we only have the subclass for converting input assembly into CodeRegions.

This is mostly a NFC patch, as the logic remains close to the original, but now encapsulated in its own class and moved outside of llvm-mca.cpp.

Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54179

llvm-svn: 346344

show more ...