Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2
# ff63d628 10-Mar-2024 Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>

[CodeExtractor] Terminate callsite blocks to new `noreturn` functions with `unreachable`

Since some of the users of `CodeExtractor` like `HotColdSplitting` run
late in the pipeline, returns are not

[CodeExtractor] Terminate callsite blocks to new `noreturn` functions with `unreachable`

Since some of the users of `CodeExtractor` like `HotColdSplitting` run
late in the pipeline, returns are not cleaned to `unreachable`. So,
just emit `unreachable` directly if the function is `noreturn`.

Closes #84682

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1
# 6fa8244e 27-Jul-2023 Johannes Doerfert <johannes@jdoerfert.de>

[IR] Mark `llvm.trap` as `memory(inaccessiblemem: write)`

Traps will not read/write the program state but they need an effect for
preservation, similar to `llvm.assume`. We really want a new memory

[IR] Mark `llvm.trap` as `memory(inaccessiblemem: write)`

Traps will not read/write the program state but they need an effect for
preservation, similar to `llvm.assume`. We really want a new memory kind
for that (see TODO), but for now `inaccessiblemem: write` is better than
any possible effect.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156476

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7
# 697bfa40 13-Dec-2022 Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>

Revert "[UpdateTestChecks] Match define for labels"

This reverts commit a888825aeef8d6592c6cf5f4e5854cc39af49633.

This changes the default output of UTC, and as such introduces
spurious changes whe

Revert "[UpdateTestChecks] Match define for labels"

This reverts commit a888825aeef8d6592c6cf5f4e5854cc39af49633.

This changes the default output of UTC, and as such introduces
spurious changes whenever existing tests are regenerated.

I've indicated in https://reviews.llvm.org/D139006#3989954 how
this can be implemented without causing test churn.

show more ...


# a888825a 12-Dec-2022 Sebastian Neubauer <Sebastian.Neubauer@amd.com>

[UpdateTestChecks] Match define for labels

Previously, the label also matched function calls with the function
name, which caused tests to fail because the label matched on the wrong
line.
Add the `

[UpdateTestChecks] Match define for labels

Previously, the label also matched function calls with the function
name, which caused tests to fail because the label matched on the wrong
line.
Add the `define` prefix, so only function defines are matched.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139006

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 40760060 18-Nov-2021 Bjorn Pettersson <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com>

[test] Use -passes in lit tests for the UpdateTestChecks tool

The UpdateTestChecks tool itself does not care about which pass
manager that is used in the opt invocation. So the lit tests that
are ve

[test] Use -passes in lit tests for the UpdateTestChecks tool

The UpdateTestChecks tool itself does not care about which pass
manager that is used in the opt invocation. So the lit tests that
are verifying the behavior of the UpdateTestChecks tool is updated
to use the new-PM syntax (-passes=) when specifying the pass pipeline
in the test cases that are used for verifying the UpdateTestChecks
tool.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114517

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2
# cd1bd6e5 15-Jan-2021 Johannes Doerfert <johannes@jdoerfert.de>

[Utils] Check for more global information in update_test_checks

This allows to check for various globals (metadata/attributes/...) and
also resolves problems with globals (metadata/attributes/...) b

[Utils] Check for more global information in update_test_checks

This allows to check for various globals (metadata/attributes/...) and
also resolves problems with globals (metadata/attributes/...) being
reused across different prefixes.

Reviewed By: sstefan1

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94741

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1
# 0628bea5 19-Oct-2020 Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>

Revert "[PM/CC1] Add -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 option to toggle splitting"

This broke Chromium's PGO build, it seems because hot-cold-splitting got turned
on unintentionally. See comment on the cod

Revert "[PM/CC1] Add -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 option to toggle splitting"

This broke Chromium's PGO build, it seems because hot-cold-splitting got turned
on unintentionally. See comment on the code review for repro etc.

> This patch adds -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 options to clang. This allows
> the splitting pass to be toggled on/off. The current method of passing
> `-mllvm -hot-cold-split=true` to clang isn't ideal as it may not compose
> correctly (say, with `-O0` or `-Oz`).
>
> To implement the -fsplit-cold-code option, an attribute is applied to
> functions to indicate that they may be considered for splitting. This
> removes some complexity from the old/new PM pipeline builders, and
> behaves as expected when LTO is enabled.
>
> Co-authored by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57265
> Reviewed By: Aditya Kumar, Vedant Kumar
> Reviewers: Teresa Johnson, Aditya Kumar, Fedor Sergeev, Philip Pfaffe, Vedant Kumar

This reverts commit 273c299d5d649a0222fbde03c9a41e41913751b4.

show more ...


# 273c299d 13-Oct-2020 Vedant Kumar <vsk@apple.com>

[PM/CC1] Add -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 option to toggle splitting

This patch adds -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 options to clang. This allows
the splitting pass to be toggled on/off. The current metho

[PM/CC1] Add -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 option to toggle splitting

This patch adds -f[no-]split-cold-code CC1 options to clang. This allows
the splitting pass to be toggled on/off. The current method of passing
`-mllvm -hot-cold-split=true` to clang isn't ideal as it may not compose
correctly (say, with `-O0` or `-Oz`).

To implement the -fsplit-cold-code option, an attribute is applied to
functions to indicate that they may be considered for splitting. This
removes some complexity from the old/new PM pipeline builders, and
behaves as expected when LTO is enabled.

Co-authored by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57265
Reviewed By: Aditya Kumar, Vedant Kumar
Reviewers: Teresa Johnson, Aditya Kumar, Fedor Sergeev, Philip Pfaffe, Vedant Kumar

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init
# 7c8bb409 13-Jan-2020 David Greene <dag@cray.com>

[UpdateCCTestChecks] Include generated functions if asked

Add the --include-generated-funcs option to update_cc_test_checks.py so that any
functions created by the compiler that don't exist in the s

[UpdateCCTestChecks] Include generated functions if asked

Add the --include-generated-funcs option to update_cc_test_checks.py so that any
functions created by the compiler that don't exist in the source will also be
checked.

We need to maintain the output order of generated function checks so that
CHECK-LABEL works properly. To do so, maintain a list of functions output for
each prefix in the order they are output. Use this list to output checks for
generated functions in the proper order.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83004

show more ...