|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
| #
d1d12935 |
| 05-Dec-2022 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[NFC] Port all runlines for SimplifyCFG pass tests to -passes syntax
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1 |
|
| #
4be8707e |
| 19-Dec-2020 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[SimplifyCFG] Teach FoldTwoEntryPHINode() to preserve DomTree
Still boring, simply drop all edges to successors of DomBlock,
and add an edge to to BB instead.
|
| #
b43b77ff |
| 19-Dec-2020 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[NFCI][SimlifyCFG] simplifyOnce(): also perform DomTree validation
And that exposes that a number of tests don't *actually* manage to
maintain DomTree validity, which is inline with my observations.
[NFCI][SimlifyCFG] simplifyOnce(): also perform DomTree validation
And that exposes that a number of tests don't *actually* manage to
maintain DomTree validity, which is inline with my observations.
Once again, SimlifyCFG pass currently does not require/preserve DomTree
by default, so this is effectively NFC.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
164e0847 |
| 17-Dec-2020 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[SimplifyCFG] DeleteDeadBlock() already knows how to preserve DomTree
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which
[SimplifyCFG] DeleteDeadBlock() already knows how to preserve DomTree
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
5c987212 |
| 09-Nov-2020 |
Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk> |
[SimplifyCFG] Remove unused check-prefixes
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
9f35d2b5 |
| 29-Aug-2019 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[SimplifyCFG] FoldTwoEntryPHINode(): don't bailout on i1 PHI's if we can hoist a 'not' from incoming values
Summary:
As it can be seen in the tests in D65143/D65144, even though we have formed an '@
[SimplifyCFG] FoldTwoEntryPHINode(): don't bailout on i1 PHI's if we can hoist a 'not' from incoming values
Summary:
As it can be seen in the tests in D65143/D65144, even though we have formed an '@llvm.umul.with.overflow'
and got rid of potential for division-by-zero, the control flow remains, we still have that branch.
We have this condition:
```
// Don't fold i1 branches on PHIs which contain binary operators
// These can often be turned into switches and other things.
if (PN->getType()->isIntegerTy(1) &&
(isa<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(0)) ||
isa<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(1)) ||
isa<BinaryOperator>(IfCond)))
return false;
```
which was added back in rL121764 to help with `select` formation i think?
That check prevents us to flatten the CFG here, even though we know
we no longer need that guard and will be able to drop everything
but the '@llvm.umul.with.overflow' + `not`.
As it can be seen from tests, we end here because the `not` is being
sinked into the PHI's incoming values by InstCombine,
so we can't workaround this by hoisting it to after PHI.
Thus i suggest that we relax that check to not bailout if we'd get to hoist the `not`.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, fhahn, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65147
llvm-svn: 370349
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
87fdcb87 |
| 23-Jul-2019 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[NFC][PhaseOredering][SimplifyCFG] Add more runlines to umul.with.overflow tests
This way it will be more obvious that the problem is both
in cost threshold and in hardcoded benefit check,
plus will
[NFC][PhaseOredering][SimplifyCFG] Add more runlines to umul.with.overflow tests
This way it will be more obvious that the problem is both
in cost threshold and in hardcoded benefit check,
plus will show how the instsimplify cleans this all in the end.
llvm-svn: 366800
show more ...
|
| #
fca23d74 |
| 22-Jul-2019 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[SimplifyCFG][NFC] Test that we fail to flatten CFG after forming @llvm.umul.with.overflow
Even if we formed @llvm.umul.with.overflow, we are still stuck
with that guard against div-by-zero, which i
[SimplifyCFG][NFC] Test that we fail to flatten CFG after forming @llvm.umul.with.overflow
Even if we formed @llvm.umul.with.overflow, we are still stuck
with that guard against div-by-zero, which is no longer needed,
because we didn't flatten the CFG.
llvm-svn: 366749
show more ...
|