|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
0271ae65 |
| 18-Jul-2022 |
Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> |
[test] Change test/SampleProfile to use opaque pointers
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
| #
7a316c0a |
| 24-Mar-2022 |
Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> |
[CSSPGO] Turn on profi and ext-tsp when using probe-based profile.
Probe-based profile leads to a better performance when combined with profi and ext-tsp block layout. I'm turning them on by default
[CSSPGO] Turn on profi and ext-tsp when using probe-based profile.
Probe-based profile leads to a better performance when combined with profi and ext-tsp block layout. I'm turning them on by default.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122442
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
51ce567b |
| 27-Oct-2021 |
modimo <modimo@fb.com> |
[SampleProfile] Add all callsites to AllCandidates if InlineReplay is in effect
Replay in sample profiling needs to be asked on candidates that may not have counts or below the threshold. If replay
[SampleProfile] Add all callsites to AllCandidates if InlineReplay is in effect
Replay in sample profiling needs to be asked on candidates that may not have counts or below the threshold. If replay is in effect for a function make sure these are captured and also imported during thinLTO.
Testing: ninja check-all
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112033
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
ac068e01 |
| 16-Dec-2020 |
Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> |
[CSSPGO] Consume pseudo-probe-based AutoFDO profile
This change enables pseudo-probe-based sample counts to be consumed by the sample profile loader under the regular `-fprofile-sample-use` switch w
[CSSPGO] Consume pseudo-probe-based AutoFDO profile
This change enables pseudo-probe-based sample counts to be consumed by the sample profile loader under the regular `-fprofile-sample-use` switch with minimal adjustments to the existing sample file formats. After the counts are imported, a probe helper, aka, a `PseudoProbeManager` object, is automatically launched to verify the CFG checksum of every function in the current compilation against the corresponding checksum from the profile. Mismatched checksums will cause a function profile to be slipped. A `SampleProfileProber` pass is scheduled before any of the `SampleProfileLoader` instances so that the CFG checksums as well as probe mappings are available during the profile loading time. The `PseudoProbeManager` object is set up right after the profile reading is done. In the future a CFG-based fuzzy matching could be done in `PseudoProbeManager`.
Samples will be applied only to pseudo probe instructions as well as probed callsites once the checksum verification goes through. Those instructions are processed in the same way that regular instructions would be processed in the line-number-based scenario. In other words, a function is processed in a regular way as if it was reduced to just containing pseudo probes (block probes and callsites).
**Adjustment to profile format **
A CFG checksum field is being added to the existing AutoFDO profile formats. So far only the text format and the extended binary format are supported. For the text format, a new line like ``` !CFGChecksum: 12345 ``` is added to the end of the body sample lines. For the extended binary profile format, we introduce a metadata section to store the checksum map from function names to their CFG checksums.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92347
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
7a6c8942 |
| 14-May-2020 |
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> |
[SampleFDO] Add use-sample-profile function attribute.
When sampleFDO is enabled, people may expect they can use -fno-profile-sample-use to opt-out using sample profile for a certain file. That coul
[SampleFDO] Add use-sample-profile function attribute.
When sampleFDO is enabled, people may expect they can use -fno-profile-sample-use to opt-out using sample profile for a certain file. That could be either for debugging purpose or for performance tuning purpose. However, when thinlto is enabled, if a function in file A compiled with -fno-profile-sample-use is imported to another file B compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, the inlined copy of the function in file B may still get its profile annotated.
The inconsistency may even introduce profile unused warning because if the target is not compiled with explicit debug information flag, the function in file A won't have its debug information enabled (debug information will be enabled implicitly only when -fprofile-sample-use is used). After it is imported into file B which is compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, profile annotation for the outline copy of the function will fail because the function has no debug information, and that will trigger profile unused warning.
We add a new attribute use-sample-profile to control whether a function will use its sample profile no matter for its outline or inline copies. That will make the behavior of -fno-profile-sample-use consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79959
show more ...
|
| #
47c1f274 |
| 11-May-2020 |
Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> |
Properly add out-of-module functions to the import list
This patch addresses two issues related to adding inline functions to the import list while recursively going through the profiling data. 1. F
Properly add out-of-module functions to the import list
This patch addresses two issues related to adding inline functions to the import list while recursively going through the profiling data. 1. For callsite samples, only add an inlined function to the import list if it's from outside of the module (i.e. only has a declaration inside the module). 2. For body samples, add each target function to the import list if it's from outside of the module (i.e. only has a declaration inside the module). Previously we were using getSubProgram() to check whether it has dbg info, which is inaccurate. This fix properly add imports and could improve the quality of the pass.
Added a few changes to the test to catch these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79379
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
cee313d2 |
| 17-Apr-2019 |
Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com> |
Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.
Will be re-reverting again.
llvm-svn: 358552
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
c876e3d4 |
| 16-Jan-2019 |
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> |
[PGO] Make pgo related options in opt more consistent.
Currently we have pgo options defined in PassManagerBuilder.cpp only for instrument pgo, but not for sample pgo. We also have pgo options defin
[PGO] Make pgo related options in opt more consistent.
Currently we have pgo options defined in PassManagerBuilder.cpp only for instrument pgo, but not for sample pgo. We also have pgo options defined in NewPMDriver.cpp in opt only for new pass manager and for all kinds of pgo. They have some inconsistency.
To make the options more consistent and make tests writing easier, the patch let old pass manager to share the same pgo options with new pass manager in opt, and removes the options in PassManagerBuilder.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56749
llvm-svn: 351392
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
94d44c97 |
| 06-Sep-2018 |
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> |
[SampleFDO] Make sample profile loader unaware of compact format change.
The patch tries to make sample profile loader independent of profile format change. It moves compact format related code into
[SampleFDO] Make sample profile loader unaware of compact format change.
The patch tries to make sample profile loader independent of profile format change. It moves compact format related code into FunctionSamples and SampleProfileReader classes, and sample profile loader only has to interact with those two classes and will be unaware of profile format changes.
The cleanup also contain some fixes to further remove the difference between compactbinary format and binary format. After the cleanup using different formats originated from the same profile will generate the same binaries, which we verified by compiling two large server benchmarks w/wo thinlto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51643
llvm-svn: 341591
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
b1ef2cc5 |
| 07-Aug-2018 |
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> |
[SampleFDO] Fix a bug in getOrCompHotCountThreshold/getOrCompColdCountThreshold
getOrCompHotCountThreshold/getOrCompColdCountThreshold introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45377 contain a bad mis
[SampleFDO] Fix a bug in getOrCompHotCountThreshold/getOrCompColdCountThreshold
getOrCompHotCountThreshold/getOrCompColdCountThreshold introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45377 contain a bad mistake and will only return 1 or 0 instead of the true hot/cold cutoff value. The patch fixes the mistake. But the mistake seems not causing big performance difference according to internal server benchmarks testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50370
llvm-svn: 339162
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
0c2f6be6 |
| 10-May-2018 |
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> |
[SampleFDO] Don't treat warm callsite with inline instance in the profile as cold
We found current sampleFDO had a performance issue when triaging a regression. For a callsite with inline instance i
[SampleFDO] Don't treat warm callsite with inline instance in the profile as cold
We found current sampleFDO had a performance issue when triaging a regression. For a callsite with inline instance in the profile, even if hot callsite inliner cannot inline it, it may still execute enough times and should not be treated as cold in regular inliner later. However, currently if such callsite is not inlined by hot callsite inliner, and the BB where the callsite locates doesn't get samples from other instructions inside of it, the callsite will have no profile metadata annotated. In regular inliner cost analysis, if the callsite has no profile annotated and its caller has profile information, it will be treated as cold.
The fix changes the isCallsiteHot check and chooses to compare CallsiteTotalSamples with hot cutoff value computed by ProfileSummaryInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45377
llvm-svn: 332058
show more ...
|
| #
2c864551 |
| 09-May-2018 |
Shiva Chen <shiva0217@gmail.com> |
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label nam
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
c6c051f2 |
| 01-Nov-2017 |
Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> |
Include GUIDs from the same module when computing GUIDs that needs to be imported.
Summary: In the compile phase of SamplePGO+ThinLTO, ICP is not invoked. Instead, indirect call targets will be incl
Include GUIDs from the same module when computing GUIDs that needs to be imported.
Summary: In the compile phase of SamplePGO+ThinLTO, ICP is not invoked. Instead, indirect call targets will be included as function metadata for ThinIndex to buidl the call graph. This should not only include functions defined in other modules, but also functions defined in the same module, otherwise ThinIndex may find the callee dead and eliminate it, while ICP in backend will revive the symbol, which leads to undefined symbol.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39480
llvm-svn: 317118
show more ...
|