|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
2f448bf5 |
| 22-Jun-2022 |
Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com> |
[X86] Migrate tests to use opaque pointers (NFC)
Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34
These are only the test updates where the test pas
[X86] Migrate tests to use opaque pointers (NFC)
Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34
These are only the test updates where the test passed without
further modification (which is almost all of them, as the backend
is largely pointer-type agnostic).
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
d87e6170 |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer@apple.com> |
Teach the backend to make references to swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags weak if it emits it
When references to the symbol `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`
are emitted they have to be we
Teach the backend to make references to swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags weak if it emits it
When references to the symbol `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`
are emitted they have to be weak.
References to the symbol `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags` get
emitted only by frame lowering code. Therefore, the backend needs to track
references to the symbol and mark them weak.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115672
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
a773db7d |
| 15-Sep-2021 |
Doug Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> |
Add a command-line flag to control the Swift extended async frame info.
Introduce a new command-line flag `-swift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift exte
Add a command-line flag to control the Swift extended async frame info.
Introduce a new command-line flag `-swift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift extended async frame
info bit. There are three possibilities:
* `auto`: which determines how to set the bit based on deployment target, either
statically or dynamically via `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`.
* `always`: the default, always set the bit statically, regardless of deployment
target.
* `never`: never set the bit, regardless of deployment target.
Patch by Doug Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109392
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
5d070c82 |
| 03-Sep-2021 |
Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com> |
SwiftAsync: use runtime-provided flag for extended frame if back-deploying
When back-deploying Swift async code we can't always toggle the flag showing an
extended frame is present because it will c
SwiftAsync: use runtime-provided flag for extended frame if back-deploying
When back-deploying Swift async code we can't always toggle the flag showing an
extended frame is present because it will confuse unwinders on systems released
before this feature. So in cases where the code might run there, we `or` in a
mask provided by the runtime (as an absolute symbol) telling us whether the
unwinders can cope.
When deploying only for newer OSs, we can still hard-code the bit-set for
greater efficiency.
show more ...
|