Remove irrelevant references to legacy git repositories from
compiler identification lines in test-cases.

(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually importan

Remove irrelevant references to legacy git repositories from
compiler identification lines in test-cases.

(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually important and need fixing.)

llvm-svn: 351200

show more ...

[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.

In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
nam

[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.

In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841

show more ...

Canonicalize the representation of empty an expression in DIGlobalVariableExpression

This change simplifies code that has to deal with
DIGlobalVariableExpression and mirrors how we treat DIExpressio

Canonicalize the representation of empty an expression in DIGlobalVariableExpression

This change simplifies code that has to deal with
DIGlobalVariableExpression and mirrors how we treat DIExpressions in
debug info intrinsics. Before this change there were two ways of
representing empty expressions on globals, a nullptr and an empty
!DIExpression().

If someone needs to upgrade out-of-tree testcases:
perl -pi -e 's/(!DIGlobalVariableExpression\(var: ![0-9]*)\)/\1, expr: !DIExpression())/g' <MYTEST.ll>
will catch 95%.

llvm-svn: 312144

show more ...

Renumber testcase metadata nodes after r290153.

This patch renumbers the metadata nodes in debug info testcases after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769. This is a separate patch because it
causes so m

Renumber testcase metadata nodes after r290153.

This patch renumbers the metadata nodes in debug info testcases after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769. This is a separate patch because it
causes so much churn. This was implemented with a python script that
pipes the testcases through llvm-as - | llvm-dis - and then goes
through the original and new output side-by side to insert all
comments at a close-enough location.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27765

llvm-svn: 290292

show more ...

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153

show more ...

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpress

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982

show more ...

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920

show more ...

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902

show more ...

DebugInfo: New metadata representation for global variables.

This patch reverses the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
This will allow us to more easily preserve debug info metadata when

DebugInfo: New metadata representation for global variables.

This patch reverses the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
This will allow us to more easily preserve debug info metadata when
manipulating global variables.

Fixes PR30362. A program for upgrading test cases is attached to that
bug.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20147

llvm-svn: 281284

show more ...

[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.

Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICom

[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.

Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.

Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.

Motivation
----------

Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.

We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.

Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>

llvm-svn: 266446

show more ...

testcase gardening: update the emissionKind enum to the new syntax. (NFC)

llvm-svn: 265081

Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

I originally reapplied this in 257550, but had to revert again due to bot
breakage. The only change in this version is to allow

Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

I originally reapplied this in 257550, but had to revert again due to bot
breakage. The only change in this version is to allow either the TypeSize
or the TypeAllocSize of the variable to be the one represented in debug info
(hopefully in the future we can figure out how to encode the difference).
Additionally, several bot failures following r257550, were due to
optimizer bugs now fixed in r257787 and r257795.

r257550 commit message was:

```
The follow extra changes were made to test cases:

Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll

Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll

Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll

Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll

Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.

The original commit message was:
``
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
``

```

llvm-svn: 257850

show more ...

Re-Revert r257105 (Verifier debug info changes)

While I investigate some new buildbot failures. This was originally reapplied
as r257550 and r257558.

llvm-svn: 257563

Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

The follow extra changes were made to test cases:

Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid

Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

The follow extra changes were made to test cases:

Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll

Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll

Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll

Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref

LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll

Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.

The original commit message was:
```
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
```

llvm-svn: 257550

show more ...

Temporarily revert r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

Looks like there's a case where clang generates debug info that triggers
the new verifier check. Reverting while inve

Temporarily revert r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"

Looks like there's a case where clang generates debug info that triggers
the new verifier check. Reverting while investigating.

llvm-svn: 257107

show more ...

[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size

Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what

[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size

Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref

Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14276

llvm-svn: 257105

show more ...

DI: Reverse direction of subprogram -> function edge.

Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for

DI: Reverse direction of subprogram -> function edge.

Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.

For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.

This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.

Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.

Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265

llvm-svn: 252219

show more ...

DI: Require subprogram definitions to be distinct

As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a veri

DI: Require subprogram definitions to be distinct

As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.

While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.

I updated almost all the IR with the following script:

git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'

Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.

llvm-svn: 246327

show more ...

DI: Disallow uniquable DICompileUnits

Since r241097, `DIBuilder` has only created distinct `DICompileUnit`s.
The backend is liable to start relying on that (if it hasn't already),
so make uniquable

DI: Disallow uniquable DICompileUnits

Since r241097, `DIBuilder` has only created distinct `DICompileUnit`s.
The backend is liable to start relying on that (if it hasn't already),
so make uniquable `DICompileUnit`s illegal and automatically upgrade old
bitcode. This is a nice cleanup, since we can remove an unnecessary
`DenseSet` (and the associated uniquing info) from `LLVMContextImpl`.

Almost all the testcases were updated with this script:

git grep -e '= !DICompileUnit' -l -- test |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's,= !DICompileUnit,= distinct !DICompileUnit,'

I imagine something similar should work for out-of-tree testcases.

llvm-svn: 243885

show more ...

DI: Remove DW_TAG_arg_variable and DW_TAG_auto_variable

Remove the fake `DW_TAG_auto_variable` and `DW_TAG_arg_variable` tags,
using `DW_TAG_variable` in their place Stop exposing the `tag:` field a

DI: Remove DW_TAG_arg_variable and DW_TAG_auto_variable

Remove the fake `DW_TAG_auto_variable` and `DW_TAG_arg_variable` tags,
using `DW_TAG_variable` in their place Stop exposing the `tag:` field at
all in the assembly format for `DILocalVariable`.

Most of the testcase updates were generated by the following sed script:

find test/ -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.mir" |
xargs grep -l 'DILocalVariable' |
xargs sed -i '' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, //' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, //'

There were only a handful of tests in `test/Assembly` that I needed to
update by hand.

(Note: a follow-up could change `DILocalVariable::DILocalVariable()` to
set the tag to `DW_TAG_formal_parameter` instead of `DW_TAG_variable`
(as appropriate), instead of having that logic magically in the backend
in `DbgVariable`. I've added a FIXME to that effect.)

llvm-svn: 243774

show more ...

IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata

Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the

IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata

Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.

Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.

Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).

Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.

llvm-svn: 236120

show more ...

DebugInfo: Add missing !dbg attachments to intrinsics

Add missing `!dbg` attachments to `@llvm.dbg.*` intrinsics. I updated
these using a script (add-dbg-to-intrinsics.sh) that I'll attach to
PR227

DebugInfo: Add missing !dbg attachments to intrinsics

Add missing `!dbg` attachments to `@llvm.dbg.*` intrinsics. I updated
these using a script (add-dbg-to-intrinsics.sh) that I'll attach to
PR22778 for posterity.

llvm-svn: 235040

show more ...

DebugInfo: Move new hierarchy into place

Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464. I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confiden

DebugInfo: Move new hierarchy into place

Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464. I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confident this commit is NFC as far as DWARF output is
concerned. Let me know if I'm wrong :).

The code changes are fairly mechanical:

- Bumped the "Debug Info Version".
- `DIBuilder` now creates the appropriate subclass of `MDNode`.
- Subclasses of DIDescriptor now expect to hold their "MD"
counterparts (e.g., `DIBasicType` expects `MDBasicType`).
- Deleted a ton of dead code in `AsmWriter.cpp` and `DebugInfo.cpp`
for printing comments.
- Big update to LangRef to describe the nodes in the new hierarchy.
Feel free to make it better.

Testcase changes are enormous. There's an accompanying clang commit on
its way.

If you have out-of-tree debug info testcases, I just broke your build.

- `upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh` is attached to PR22564. I used it to
update all the IR testcases.
- Unfortunately I failed to find way to script the updates to CHECK
lines, so I updated all of these by hand. This was fairly painful,
since the old CHECKs are difficult to reason about. That's one of
the benefits of the new hierarchy.

This work isn't quite finished, BTW. The `DIDescriptor` subclasses are
almost empty wrappers, but not quite: they still have loose casting
checks (see the `RETURN_FROM_RAW()` macro). Once they're completely
gutted, I'll rename the "MD" classes to "DI" and kill the wrappers. I
also expect to make a few schema changes now that it's easier to reason
about everything.

llvm-svn: 231082

show more ...

IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly

Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly. These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

- Only use

IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly

Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly. These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

- Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

- Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
!1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
!2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
!3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = !{!2}
!1 = !{i32* @global}
!2 = !{!3}
!3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines). I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257

show more ...