History log of /llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/select-and.ll (Results 1 – 10 of 10)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init
# 0cb7636a 28-Jan-2025 Djordje Todorovic <djordje.todorovic@htecgroup.com>

[RISCV] Add MIPS extensions (#121394)

Adding two extensions for MIPS p8700 CPU:
1. cmove (conditional move)
2. lsp (load/store pair)

The official product page here:
https://mips.com/produc

[RISCV] Add MIPS extensions (#121394)

Adding two extensions for MIPS p8700 CPU:
1. cmove (conditional move)
2. lsp (load/store pair)

The official product page here:
https://mips.com/products/hardware/p8700

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init
# eabaee0c 07-Jan-2024 Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>

[RISCV] Omit "@plt" in assembly output "call foo@plt" (#72467)

R_RISCV_CALL/R_RISCV_CALL_PLT distinction is not necessary and
R_RISCV_CALL has been deprecated. Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D132530

[RISCV] Omit "@plt" in assembly output "call foo@plt" (#72467)

R_RISCV_CALL/R_RISCV_CALL_PLT distinction is not necessary and
R_RISCV_CALL has been deprecated. Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D132530
`call foo` assembles to R_RISCV_CALL_PLT. The `@plt` suffix is not
useful and can be removed now (matching AArch64 and PowerPC).

GNU assembler assembles `call foo` to RISCV_CALL_PLT since 2022-09
(70f35d72ef04cd23771875c1661c9975044a749c).

Without this patch, unconditionally changing MO_CALL to MO_PLT could
create `jump .L1@plt, a0`, which is invalid in LLVM integrated assembler
and GNU assembler.

show more ...


# 2c185709 13-Dec-2023 Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>

[RISCV] Remove setJumpIsExpensive(). (#74647)

Middle end up optimizations can speculate away the short circuit
behavior of C/C++ && and ||. Using i1 and/or or logical select
instructions and a sin

[RISCV] Remove setJumpIsExpensive(). (#74647)

Middle end up optimizations can speculate away the short circuit
behavior of C/C++ && and ||. Using i1 and/or or logical select
instructions and a single branch.

SelectionDAGBuilder can turn i1 and/or/select back into multiple
branches, but this is disabled when jump is expensive.

RISC-V can use slt(u)(i) to evaluate a condition into any GPR which
makes us better than other targets that use a flag register. RISC-V also
has single instruction compare and branch. So its not clear from a code
size perspective that using compare+and/or is better.

If the full condition is dependent on multiple loads, using a logic
delays the branch resolution until all the loads are resolved even if
there is a cheap condition that makes the loads unnecessary.

PowerPC and Lanai are the only CPU targets that use setJumpIsExpensive.
NVPTX and AMDGPU also use it but they are GPU targets. PowerPC appears
to have a MachineIR pass that turns AND/OR of CR bits into multiple
branches. I don't know anything about Lanai and their reason for using
setJumpIsExpensive.

I think the decision to use logic vs branches is much more nuanced than
this big hammer. So I propose to make RISC-V match other CPU targets.

Anyone who wants the old behavior can still pass -mllvm
-jump-is-expensive=true.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2
# 70a64fe7 21-Sep-2022 Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>

[RISCV] Remove support for the unratified Zbt extension.

This extension does not appear to be on its way to ratification.

Out of the unratified bitmanip extensions, this one had the
largest impact

[RISCV] Remove support for the unratified Zbt extension.

This extension does not appear to be on its way to ratification.

Out of the unratified bitmanip extensions, this one had the
largest impact on the compiler.

Posting this patch to start a discussion about whether we should
remove these extensions. We'll talk more at the RISC-V sync meeting this
Thursday.

Reviewed By: asb, reames

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133834

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2
# 4ab0f51a 21-Jan-2021 Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>

Recommit "[RISCV] Legalize select when Zbt extension available"

This recommits 71ed4b6ce57d8843ef705af8f98305976a8f107a with
the polarity of some of the pattern corrected.

Original commit message:

Recommit "[RISCV] Legalize select when Zbt extension available"

This recommits 71ed4b6ce57d8843ef705af8f98305976a8f107a with
the polarity of some of the pattern corrected.

Original commit message:
The custom expansion of select operations in the RISC-V backend
interferes with the matching of cmov instructions. Legalizing
select when the Zbt extension is available solves that problem.

Reviewed By: luismarques, craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93767

show more ...


# ce8b3937 19-Jan-2021 Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>

[RISCV] Add DAG combine to turn (setcc X, 1, setne) -> (setcc X, 0, seteq) if we can prove X is 0/1.

If we are able to compare with 0 instead of 1, we might be able
to fold the setcc into a beqz/bne

[RISCV] Add DAG combine to turn (setcc X, 1, setne) -> (setcc X, 0, seteq) if we can prove X is 0/1.

If we are able to compare with 0 instead of 1, we might be able
to fold the setcc into a beqz/bnez.

Often these setccs start life as an xor that gets converted to
a setcc by DAG combiner's rebuildSetcc. I looked into a detecting
(xor X, 1) and converting to (seteq X, 0) based on boolean contents
being 0/1 in rebuildSetcc instead of using computeKnownBits. It was
very perturbing to AMDGPU tests which I didn't look closely at.
It had a few changes on a couple other targets, but didn't seem
to be much if any improvement.

Reviewed By: lenary

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94730

show more ...


# b42ff9fb 18-Jan-2021 Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>

[RISCV][NFC] Increase test coverage of Zbt extension

Add Zbt (ternary) extension code generation to the select lowering
tests since it can have a significant impact on how select is
lowered.

While

[RISCV][NFC] Increase test coverage of Zbt extension

Add Zbt (ternary) extension code generation to the select lowering
tests since it can have a significant impact on how select is
lowered.

While we are here make the neg-abs commands more consistent with
the other tests.

Reviewed By: lenary

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94798

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2
# e28b6a60 09-Dec-2020 Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>

[RISCV][NFC] Regenerate RISCV CodeGen tests

Regenerated using:

./llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py -u llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/*.ll

This has added comments to spill-related instructions and adde

[RISCV][NFC] Regenerate RISCV CodeGen tests

Regenerated using:

./llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py -u llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/*.ll

This has added comments to spill-related instructions and added @plt to
some symbols.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92841

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3
# 7dc89266 01-Jul-2020 Sam Elliott <selliott@lowrisc.org>

[RISCV] Implement Hooks to avoid chaining SELECT

Summary:
This implements two hooks that attempt to avoid control flow for RISC-V. RISC-V
will lower SELECTs into control flow, which is not a great i

[RISCV] Implement Hooks to avoid chaining SELECT

Summary:
This implements two hooks that attempt to avoid control flow for RISC-V. RISC-V
will lower SELECTs into control flow, which is not a great idea.

The hook `hasMultipleConditionRegisters()` turns off the following
DAGCombiner folds:
select(C0|C1, x, y) <=> select(C0, x, select(C1, x, y))
select(C0&C1, x, y) <=> select(C0, select(C1, x, y), y)

The second hook `setJumpIsExpensive` controls a flag that has a similar purpose
and is used in CodeGenPrepare and the SelectionDAGBuilder.

Both of these have the effect of ensuring more logic is done before fewer jumps.

Note: with the `B` extension, we may be able to lower select into a conditional
move instruction, so at some point these hooks will need to be guarded based on
enabled extensions.

Reviewed By: luismarques

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79268

show more ...


# c44266dc 01-Jul-2020 Sam Elliott <selliott@lowrisc.org>

[RISCV][NFC] Add Test for (select (or B1, B2), X, Y)

Summary:
As shown, LLVM is keen to avoid logic and introduce selects (in DAGCombiner, and
other places). This leads to control flow on RISC-V whi

[RISCV][NFC] Add Test for (select (or B1, B2), X, Y)

Summary:
As shown, LLVM is keen to avoid logic and introduce selects (in DAGCombiner, and
other places). This leads to control flow on RISC-V which we should attempt to
avoid.

Reviewed By: luismarques

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79267

show more ...