[IR] Introduce captures attribute (#116990)

This introduces the `captures` attribute as described in:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improvements-to-capture-tracking/81420

This initial patch o

[IR] Introduce captures attribute (#116990)

This introduces the `captures` attribute as described in:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improvements-to-capture-tracking/81420

This initial patch only introduces the IR/bitcode support for the
attribute and its in-memory representation as `CaptureInfo`. This will
be followed by a patch to upgrade and remove the `nocapture` attribute,
and then by actual inference/analysis support.

Based on the RFC feedback, I've used a syntax similar to the `memory`
attribute, though the only "location" that can be specified is `ret`.

I've added some pretty extensive documentation to LangRef on the
semantics. One non-obvious bit here is that using ptrtoint will not
result in a "return-only" capture, even if the ptrtoint result is only
used in the return value. Without this requirement we wouldn't be able
to continue ordinary capture analysis on the return value.

show more ...