|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
| #
bf67186b |
| 03-Dec-2022 |
Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> |
Function: Respect IgnoreLLVMUsed with addrspacecasted functions
Try to respect IgnoreLLVMUsed if the function was addrspacecasted to
match llvm.used's type.
|
| #
67c8636e |
| 08-Dec-2022 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[NFC] Port all Analysis/CallGraph tests to `-passes=` syntax
|
| #
b1a95848 |
| 08-Dec-2022 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[opt] Disincentivize new tests from using old pass syntax
Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests,
and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax
from ~18
[opt] Disincentivize new tests from using old pass syntax
Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests,
and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax
from ~1800 to just 200.
Left to handle: (as it is seen in this patch)
* Transforms/LSR
* Transforms/CGP
* Transforms/TypePromotion
* Transforms/HardwareLoops
* Analysis/*
* some misc.
I think this is the right point to start actively refusing
to honor the old syntax, except for the old tests,
to prevent the old syntax from creeping back in.
Thus, let's add temporary default-off flag,
and if it is not passed refuse to accept old syntax.
The tests that still need porting are annotated with this flag.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139647
show more ...
|
| #
7cf55817 |
| 02-Dec-2022 |
Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> |
Analysis: Update some tests for opaque pointers
StackSafetyAnalysis/lifetime.ll had one bitcast removed that may have
mattered. The concluded lifetime is longer based on the underlying
alloca, inste
Analysis: Update some tests for opaque pointers
StackSafetyAnalysis/lifetime.ll had one bitcast removed that may have
mattered. The concluded lifetime is longer based on the underlying
alloca, instead of the bitcasted pointer so left that as a pointless
cast.
local.ll memintrin.ll needed some manual fixes
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5 |
|
| #
5f0ac1ef |
| 05-Apr-2021 |
Stanislav Mekhanoshin <Stanislav.Mekhanoshin@amd.com> |
Set IgnoreLLVMUsed to false in CallGraph::addToCallGraph()
clang++ uses llvm.compiler.used in certain cases to preserve
symbol which is fully inlined. D96087 has resulted in undefined
symbols in suc
Set IgnoreLLVMUsed to false in CallGraph::addToCallGraph()
clang++ uses llvm.compiler.used in certain cases to preserve
symbol which is fully inlined. D96087 has resulted in undefined
symbols in such cases. Set it to false by default to preserve
old behavior but keep the option for specific uses where we
want to ignore these (e.g. to detect a potential indirect call
to a function).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99897
show more ...
|