|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
| #
bb6497ff |
| 02-Dec-2023 |
Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@google.com> |
[BPI] Reuse the AsmWriter's BB naming scheme in BranchProbabilityPrinterPass (#73593)
When using `BranchProbabilityPrinterPass`, if a BB has no name, we get pretty unusable information like `edge ->
[BPI] Reuse the AsmWriter's BB naming scheme in BranchProbabilityPrinterPass (#73593)
When using `BranchProbabilityPrinterPass`, if a BB has no name, we get pretty unusable information like `edge -> has probability...` (i.e. we have no idea what the vertices of that edge are).
This patch uses `printAsOperand`, which uses the same naming scheme as `Function::dump`, so for example during debugging sessions, the IR obtained from a function and the names used by `BranchProbabilityPrinterPass` will match.
A shortcoming is that `printAsOperand` will result in the numbering algorithm re-running for every edge and every vertex (when `BranchProbabilityPrinterPass` is run on a function). If, for the given scenario, this is a problem, we can revisit this subsequently.
Another nuance is that the entry basic block will be numbered, which may be slightly confusing when it's anonymous, but it's easily identifiable - the first edge would have it as source (and the number should be easily recognizable)
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
50153213 |
| 01-Sep-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
[test][NewPM] Remove RUN lines using -analyze
Only tests in llvm/test/Analysis.
-analyze is legacy PM-specific.
This only touches files with `-passes`.
I looked through everything and made sure t
[test][NewPM] Remove RUN lines using -analyze
Only tests in llvm/test/Analysis.
-analyze is legacy PM-specific.
This only touches files with `-passes`.
I looked through everything and made sure that everything had a new PM equivalent.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109040
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
84a8ca1e |
| 17-Sep-2020 |
Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com> |
[NewPM] Pin -lazy-branch-prob and -lazy-block-freq tests to legacy PM
NPM passes just use the normal versions of these analyses instead.
Also pin any tests with -analyze to legacy PM.
Reviewed By:
[NewPM] Pin -lazy-branch-prob and -lazy-block-freq tests to legacy PM
NPM passes just use the normal versions of these analyses instead.
Also pin any tests with -analyze to legacy PM.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87857
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bb0842a3 |
| 29-Apr-2020 |
Evgeniy Brevnov <evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com> |
[BPI] Incorrect probability reported in case of mulptiple edges.
Summary:
By design 'BranchProbabilityInfo:: getEdgeProbability(const BasicBlock *Src, const BasicBlock *Dst) const' should return sum
[BPI] Incorrect probability reported in case of mulptiple edges.
Summary:
By design 'BranchProbabilityInfo:: getEdgeProbability(const BasicBlock *Src, const BasicBlock *Dst) const' should return sum of probabilities over all edges from Src to Dst. Current implementation is buggy and returns 1/num_of_successors if probabilities are not explicitly set.
Note current implementation of BPI printing has an issue as well and annotates each edge with sum of probabilities over all ages from one basic block to another. That's why 30% probability reported (instead of 10%) in the lit test. This is not urgent issue since only printing is affected.
Note also current implementation assumes that either all or none edges have probabilities set. This is not the only place which uses such assumption. At least we should assert that in verifier. In addition we can think on a more robust API of BPI which would prevent situations.
Reviewers: skatkov, yrouban, taewookoh
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79071
show more ...
|