History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyReplacePhysRegs.cpp (Results 1 – 18 of 18)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4
# cde083e0 13-May-2022 Heejin Ahn <aheejin@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] Fix register use-def in FixIrreducibleControlFlow

FixIrreducibleControlFlow pass adds dispatch blocks with a `br_table`
that has multiple predecessors and successors, because it serves

[WebAssembly] Fix register use-def in FixIrreducibleControlFlow

FixIrreducibleControlFlow pass adds dispatch blocks with a `br_table`
that has multiple predecessors and successors, because it serves as
something like a traffic hub for BBs. As a result of this, there can be
register uses that are not dominated by a def in every path from the
entry block. For example, suppose register %a is defined in BB1 and used
in BB2, and there is a single path from BB1 and BB2:
```
BB1 -> ... -> BB2
```
After FixIrreducibleControlFlow runs, there can be a dispatch block
between these two BBs:
```
BB1 -> ... -> Dispatch -> ... -> BB2
```
And this dispatch block has multiple predecessors, now
there is a path to BB2 that does not first visit BB1, and in that path
%a is not dominated by a def anymore.

To fix this problem, we have been adding `IMPLICIT_DEF`s to all
registers in PrepareForLiveInternals pass, and then remove unnecessary
ones in OptimizeLiveIntervals pass after computing `LiveIntervals`. But
FixIrreducibleControlFlow pass itself ends up violating register use-def
relationship, resulting in invalid code. This was OK so far because
MIR verifier apparently didn't check this in validation. But @arsenm
fixed this and it caught this bug in validation
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55249).

This CL moves the `IMPLICIT_DEF` adding routine from
PrepareForLiveInternals to FixIrreducibleControlFlow. We only run it
when FixIrreducibleControlFlow changes the code. And then
PrepareForLiveInternals doesn't do anything other than setting
`TracksLiveness` property, which is a prerequisite for running
`LiveIntervals` analysis, which is required by the next pass
OptimizeLiveIntervals.

But in our backend we don't seem to do anything that invalidates this up
until OptimizeLiveIntervals, and I'm not sure why we are calling
`invalidateLiveness` in ReplacePhysRegs pass, because what that pass
does is to replace physical registers with virtual ones 1-to-1. I
deleted the `invalidateLiveness` call there and we don't need to set
that flag explicitly, which obviates all the need for
PrepareForLiveInternals.

(By the way, This 'Liveness' here is different from `LiveIntervals`
analysis. Setting this only means BBs' live-in info is correct, all uses
are dominated by defs, `kill` flag is conservatively correct, which
means if there is a `kill` flag set it should be the last use. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2a0837aab1489c88efb03784e34c4dc9f2e28302/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h#L125-L134
for details.)

So this CL removes PrepareForLiveInternals pass altogether. Something
similar to this was attempted by D56091 long ago but that came short of
actually removing the pass, and I couldn't land it because
FixIrreducibleControlFlow violated use-def relationship, which this CL
fixes.

This doesn't change output in any meaningful way. All test changes
except `irreducible-cfg.mir` are register numbering.

Also this will likely to reduce compilation time, because we have been
adding `IMPLICIT_DEF` for all registers every time `-O2` is given, but
now we do that only when there is irreducible control flow, which is
rare.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55249.

Reviewed By: dschuff, kripken

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125515

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# bd4dad87 07-Oct-2021 Jack Andersen <jackoalan@gmail.com>

[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand

Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::

[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand

Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::Debug operands. This change enforces
this invariant as part of MachineInstr::addOperand so that all passes
emit this flag consistently.

RegState::Debug is inconsistently set on DBG_VALUE registers throughout
LLVM. This runs the risk of a filtering iterator like
MachineRegisterInfo::reg_nodbg_iterator to process these operands
erroneously when not parsed from MIR sources.

This issue was observed in the development of the llvm-mos fork which
adds a backend that relies on physical register operands much more than
existing targets. Physical RegUnit 0 has the same numeric encoding as
$noreg (indicating an undef for DBG_VALUE). Allowing debug operands into
the machine scheduler correlates $noreg with RegUnit 0 (i.e. a collision
of register numbers with different zero semantics). Eventually, this
causes an assert where DBG_VALUE instructions are prohibited from
participating in live register ranges.

Reviewed By: MatzeB, StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110105

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 85b4b21c 21-Sep-2021 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[llvm] Use make_early_inc_range (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init
# ff171acf 18-Dec-2019 Derek Schuff <dschuff@chromium.org>

[WebAssembly] Track frame registers through VReg and local allocation

This change has 2 components:

Target-independent: add a method getDwarfFrameBase to TargetFrameLowering. It
describes how the D

[WebAssembly] Track frame registers through VReg and local allocation

This change has 2 components:

Target-independent: add a method getDwarfFrameBase to TargetFrameLowering. It
describes how the Dwarf frame base will be encoded. That can be a register (the
default), the CFA (which replaces NVPTX-specific logic in DwarfCompileUnit), or
a DW_OP_WASM_location descriptr.

WebAssembly: Allow WebAssemblyFunctionInfo::getFrameRegister to return the
correct virtual register instead of FP32/SP32 after WebAssemblyReplacePhysRegs
has run. Make WebAssemblyExplicitLocals store the local it allocates for the
frame register. Use this local information to implement getDwarfFrameBase

The result is that the DW_AT_frame_base attribute is correctly encoded for each
subprogram, and each param and local variable has a correct DW_AT_location that
uses DW_OP_fbreg to refer to the frame base.

This is a reland of rG3a05c3969c18 with fixes for the expensive-checks
and Windows builds

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71681

show more ...


# 80906d9d 16-Jan-2020 Derek Schuff <dschuff@chromium.org>

Revert "[WebAssembly] Track frame registers through VReg and local allocation"

This reverts commit 3a05c3969c18b5520e360b78fc63cda39a6be98f.
It breaks under expensive-checks and on Windows


# 3a05c396 18-Dec-2019 Derek Schuff <dschuff@chromium.org>

[WebAssembly] Track frame registers through VReg and local allocation

This change has 2 components:

Target-independent: add a method getDwarfFrameBase to TargetFrameLowering. It
describes how the D

[WebAssembly] Track frame registers through VReg and local allocation

This change has 2 components:

Target-independent: add a method getDwarfFrameBase to TargetFrameLowering. It
describes how the Dwarf frame base will be encoded. That can be a register (the
default), the CFA (which replaces NVPTX-specific logic in DwarfCompileUnit), or
a DW_OP_WASM_location descriptr.

WebAssembly: Allow WebAssemblyFunctionInfo::getFrameRegister to return the
correct virtual register instead of FP32/SP32 after WebAssemblyReplacePhysRegs
has run. Make WebAssemblyExplicitLocals store the local it allocates for the
frame register. Use this local information to implement getDwarfFrameBase

The result is that the DW_AT_frame_base attribute is correctly encoded for each
subprogram, and each param and local variable has a correct DW_AT_location that
uses DW_OP_fbreg to refer to the frame base.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71681

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3
# f208f631 05-Sep-2018 Heejin Ahn <aheejin@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] clang-format (NFC)

Summary: This patch runs clang-format on all wasm-only files.

Reviewers: aardappel, dschuff, sunfish, tlively

Subscribers: MatzeB, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-c

[WebAssembly] clang-format (NFC)

Summary: This patch runs clang-format on all wasm-only files.

Reviewers: aardappel, dschuff, sunfish, tlively

Subscribers: MatzeB, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51447

llvm-svn: 341439

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2
# d34e60ca 14-May-2018 Nicola Zaghen <nicola.zaghen@imgtec.com>

Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.

The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/

Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.

The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.

In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624

llvm-svn: 332240

show more ...


# 5f8f34e4 01-May-2018 Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com>

Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they ar

Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290

llvm-svn: 331272

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1
# 40926451 30-Mar-2018 Jacob Gravelle <jgravelle@google.com>

[WebAssembly] Register wasm passes with the PassRegistry

Summary:
This exposes WebAssembly passes for use on the command line (as
arguments to -print-before and the like).

Reviewers: dschuff, sunfi

[WebAssembly] Register wasm passes with the PassRegistry

Summary:
This exposes WebAssembly passes for use on the command line (as
arguments to -print-before and the like).

Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish

Subscribers: MatzeB, jfb, sbc100, llvm-commits, aheejin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45103

llvm-svn: 328901

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3
# 6bda14b3 06-Jun-2017 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1
# e040533e 03-Oct-2016 Dan Gohman <dan433584@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] Update to more stack-machine-oriented terminology.

WebAssembly has officially switched from being an AST to being a stack
machine. Update various bits of terminology and README.md entr

[WebAssembly] Update to more stack-machine-oriented terminology.

WebAssembly has officially switched from being an AST to being a stack
machine. Update various bits of terminology and README.md entries
accordingly.

llvm-svn: 283154

show more ...


# 117296c0 01-Oct-2016 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>

Use StringRef in Pass/PassManager APIs (NFC)

llvm-svn: 283004


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2
# a8a63829 17-Aug-2016 Dominic Chen <d.c.ddcc@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing (reland r278967)

Summary: Currently, enabling debug information when compiling for WebAssembly crashes the backend. This

[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing (reland r278967)

Summary: Currently, enabling debug information when compiling for WebAssembly crashes the backend. This commit fixes these by skipping debug values in backend passes.

Reviewers: jfb, aprantl, dschuff, echristo

Subscribers: llvm-commits, dschuff, jfb, MatzeB, dexonsmith, yurydelendik, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23635

llvm-svn: 279011

show more ...


# afdd8e54 17-Aug-2016 Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com>

Revert "[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing"

This reverts commit r278967, since the new test is failing when you
don't build the WebAssembly target (most pe

Revert "[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing"

This reverts commit r278967, since the new test is failing when you
don't build the WebAssembly target (most people, since it's
off-by-default).

llvm-svn: 278973

show more ...


# 4326167a 17-Aug-2016 Dominic Chen <d.c.ddcc@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing

Summary: Currently, enabling debug information when compiling for WebAssembly crashes the backend. This commit fixes the

[WebAssembly] Handle debug information and virtual registers without crashing

Summary: Currently, enabling debug information when compiling for WebAssembly crashes the backend. This commit fixes these by skipping debug values in backend passes.

Reviewers: jfb, aprantl, dschuff, echristo

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, yurydelendik, dexonsmith, MatzeB, jfb, dschuff, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21808

llvm-svn: 278967

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1
# 0cfb5f85 10-May-2016 Dan Gohman <dan433584@gmail.com>

[WebAssembly] Move register stackification and coloring to a late phase.

Move the register stackification and coloring passes to run very late, after
PEI, tail duplication, and most other passes. Th

[WebAssembly] Move register stackification and coloring to a late phase.

Move the register stackification and coloring passes to run very late, after
PEI, tail duplication, and most other passes. This means that all code emitted
and expanded by those passes is now exposed to these passes. This also
eliminates the need for prologue/epilogue code to be manually stackified,
which significantly simplifies the code.

This does require running LiveIntervals a second time. It's useful to think
of these late passes not as late optimization passes, but as a domain-specific
compression algorithm based on knowledge of liveness information. It's used to
compress the code after all conventional optimizations are complete, which is
why it uses LiveIntervals at a phase when actual optimization passes don't
typically need it.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20075

llvm-svn: 269012

show more ...