[ARM] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#116155)

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

[IR] Don't include Module.h in Analysis.h (NFC) (#97023)

Replace it with a forward declaration instead. Analysis.h is pulled in
by all passes, but not all passes need to access the module.

[ARM,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#70014)

The ELF code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811 emits LDRLIT_ga_pcrel
when `TM.isPositionIndepende

[ARM,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#70014)

The ELF code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811 emits LDRLIT_ga_pcrel
when `TM.isPositionIndependent()` but uses a different condition
`Subtarget.isGVIndirectSymbol(GV)` (aka dso_preemptable on ELF targets).
This would cause incorrect access for dso_preemptable
`__stack_chk_guard` with the static relocation model.

Regarding whether `__stack_chk_guard` gets the dso_local specifier,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150841 switched to
`M.getDirectAccessExternalData()` (implied by "PIC Level") instead of
`TM.getRelocationModel() == Reloc::Static`.

The result is that when non-zero "PIC Level" is used with static
relocation model (e.g. -fPIE/-fPIC LTO compiles with -no-pie linking),
`__stack_chk_guard` accesses are incorrect.
```
ldr r0, .LCPI0_0
ldr r0, [r0]
ldr r0, [r0] // incorrectly dereferences __stack_chk_guard
...
.LCPI0_0:
.long __stack_chk_guard
```

To fix this, for dso_preemptable `__stack_chk_guard`, emit a GOT PIC
code sequence like for -fpic using `LDRLIT_ga_pcrel`:
```
ldr r0, .LCPI0_0
.LPC0_0:
add r0, pc, r0
ldr r0, [r0]
ldr r0, [r0]
...
LCPI0_0:
.Ltmp0:
.long __stack_chk_guard(GOT_PREL)-((.LPC0_0+8)-.Ltmp0)
```

Technically, `LDRLIT_ga_abs` with `R_ARM_GOT_ABS` could be used, but
`R_ARM_GOT_ABS` does not have GNU or integrated assembler support.
(Note, `.LCPI0_0: .long __stack_chk_guard@GOT` produces an
`R_ARM_GOT_BREL`, which is not desired).

This patch fixes #6499 while not changing behavior for the following
configurations:
```
run arm.linux.nopic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fno-pic
run arm.linux.pie --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpie
run arm.linux.pic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpic
run armv6.darwin.nopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fno-pic
run armv6.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv6.darwin.pic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fpic
run armv7.darwin.nopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fno-pic
run armv7.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv7.darwin.pic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fpic
run arm64.darwin.pic --target=arm64-apple-darwin
```

show more ...

[Target] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

Revert "[llvm] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)"

This reverts commit fd4808887ee47f3ec8a030e9211169ef4fb094c3.

This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:

warning: base cl

Revert "[llvm] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)"

This reverts commit fd4808887ee47f3ec8a030e9211169ef4fb094c3.

This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:

warning: base class ‘class llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand’ should be
explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

show more ...

[llvm] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

[ARM] implement support for TLS register based stack protector

Implement support for loading the stack canary from a memory location held in
the TLS register, with an optional offset applied. This i

[ARM] implement support for TLS register based stack protector

Implement support for loading the stack canary from a memory location held in
the TLS register, with an optional offset applied. This is used by the Linux
kernel to implement per-task stack canaries, which is impossible on SMP systems
when using a global variable for the stack canary.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112768

show more ...

[ARM] implement LOAD_STACK_GUARD for remaining targets

Currently, LOAD_STACK_GUARD on ARM is only implemented for Mach-O targets, and
other targets rely on the generic support which may result in sp

[ARM] implement LOAD_STACK_GUARD for remaining targets

Currently, LOAD_STACK_GUARD on ARM is only implemented for Mach-O targets, and
other targets rely on the generic support which may result in spilling of the
stack canary value or address, or may cause it to be kept in a callee save
register across function calls, which means they essentially get spilled as
well, only by the callee when it wants to free up this register.

So let's implement LOAD_STACK GUARD for other targets as well. This ensures
that the load of the stack canary is rematerialized fully in the epilogue.

This code was split off from

D112768: [ARM] implement support for TLS register based stack protector

for which it is a prerequisite.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811

show more ...

Change void getNoop(MCInst &NopInst) to MCInst getNop()

Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widel

Change void getNoop(MCInst &NopInst) to MCInst getNop()

Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widely used and improves
consistency with hasEmitNops/setEmitNops/emitNop/etc.

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] Transitionning more getMachineMemOperand call sites

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pip

[Alignment][NFC] Transitionning more getMachineMemOperand call sites

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77127

show more ...

Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Re

Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).

Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor

Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&

Depends on D65919

Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962

llvm-svn: 369041

show more ...

[ARM] Add OptMinSize to ARMSubtarget

In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attribut

[ARM] Add OptMinSize to ARMSubtarget

In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attributes. A subtarget is created on a
per-function basis, so it's possible to know when we're compiling for
code size on construction so record this in the new object.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57812

llvm-svn: 353501

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[ARM] Move machine operand target flags to ARMBaseInstrInfo

This makes sure the flags are available for use for thumb MIR as well.

A test that requires this will be added in the next commit.

llvm-

[ARM] Move machine operand target flags to ARMBaseInstrInfo

This makes sure the flags are available for use for thumb MIR as well.

A test that requires this will be added in the next commit.

llvm-svn: 340450

show more ...

[MI] Change the array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers to be
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.

The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for s

[MI] Change the array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers to be
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.

The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.

Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.

I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).

Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.

This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.

The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701

llvm-svn: 339940

show more ...

[arm] Implement Target Operand Flag MIR serialization.

Reviewers: efriedma, pcc

Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.ll

[arm] Implement Target Operand Flag MIR serialization.

Reviewers: efriedma, pcc

Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39975

llvm-svn: 322312

show more ...

Re-commit r301040 "X86: Don't emit zero-byte functions on Windows"

In addition to the original commit, tighten the condition for when to
pad empty functions to COFF Windows. This avoids running int

Re-commit r301040 "X86: Don't emit zero-byte functions on Windows"

In addition to the original commit, tighten the condition for when to
pad empty functions to COFF Windows. This avoids running into problems
when targeting e.g. Win32 AMDGPU, which caused test failures when this
was committed initially.

llvm-svn: 301047

show more ...

Revert r301040 "X86: Don't emit zero-byte functions on Windows"

This broke almost all bots. Reverting while fixing.

llvm-svn: 301041

X86: Don't emit zero-byte functions on Windows

Empty functions can lead to duplicate entries in the Guard CF Function
Table of a binary due to multiple functions sharing the same RVA,
causing the ke

X86: Don't emit zero-byte functions on Windows

Empty functions can lead to duplicate entries in the Guard CF Function
Table of a binary due to multiple functions sharing the same RVA,
causing the kernel to refuse to load that binary.

We had a terrific bug due to this in Chromium.

It turns out we were already doing this for Mach-O in certain
situations. This patch expands the code for that in
AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBody() and renames
TargetInstrInfo::getNoopForMachoTarget() to simply getNoop() since it
seems it was used for not just Mach-O anyway.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32330

llvm-svn: 301040

show more ...

[ARM] CodeGen: Remove AddDefaultPred. NFC.

Replace all uses of AddDefaultPred with MachineInstrBuilder::add(predOps()).
This makes the code building MachineInstrs more readable, because it allows us

[ARM] CodeGen: Remove AddDefaultPred. NFC.

Replace all uses of AddDefaultPred with MachineInstrBuilder::add(predOps()).
This makes the code building MachineInstrs more readable, because it allows us
to write code like:

MIB.addSomeOperand(blah)
.add(predOps())
.addAnotherOperand(blahblah)

instead of

AddDefaultPred(MIB.addSomeOperand(blah))
.addAnotherOperand(blahblah)

This commit also adds the predOps helper in the ARM backend, as well as the add
method taking a variable number of operands to the MachineInstrBuilder.

The transformation has been done mostly automatically with a custom tool based
on Clang AST Matchers + RefactoringTool.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28555

llvm-svn: 291890

show more ...

[CodeGen] Split out the notions of MI invariance and MI dereferenceability.

Summary:
An IR load can be invariant, dereferenceable, neither, or both. But
currently, MI's notion of invariance is IR-i

[CodeGen] Split out the notions of MI invariance and MI dereferenceability.

Summary:
An IR load can be invariant, dereferenceable, neither, or both. But
currently, MI's notion of invariance is IR-invariant &&
IR-dereferenceable.

This patch splits up the notions of invariance and dereferenceability at
the MI level. It's NFC, so adds some probably-unnecessary
"is-dereferenceable" checks, which we can remove later if desired.

Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD

Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, nemanjai, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23371

llvm-svn: 281151

show more ...

[CodeGen] Take a MachineMemOperand::Flags in MachineFunction::getMachineMemOperand.

Summary:
Previously we took an unsigned.

Hooray for type-safety.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: dsanders, ll

[CodeGen] Take a MachineMemOperand::Flags in MachineFunction::getMachineMemOperand.

Summary:
Previously we took an unsigned.

Hooray for type-safety.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22282

llvm-svn: 275591

show more ...

Don't pass a Reloc::Model to GVIsIndirectSymbol.

It already has access to it.

While at it, rename it to isGVIndirectSymbol.

llvm-svn: 274023

Don't pass Reloc::Model to places that already have it. NFC.

llvm-svn: 274022

ARM/ELF: Better codegen for global variable addresses.

In PIC mode we were previously computing global variable addresses (or GOT
entry addresses) by adding the PC, the PC-relative GOT displacement

ARM/ELF: Better codegen for global variable addresses.

In PIC mode we were previously computing global variable addresses (or GOT
entry addresses) by adding the PC, the PC-relative GOT displacement and
the GOT-relative symbol/GOT entry displacement. Because the latter two
displacements are fixed, we ended up performing one more addition than
necessary.

This change causes us to compute addresses using a single PC-relative
displacement, resulting in a shorter code sequence. This reduces code size
by about 4% in a recent build of Chromium for Android.

As a result of this change we no longer need to compute the GOT base address
in the ARM backend, which allows us to remove the Global Base Reg pass and
SDAG lowering for the GOT.

We also now no longer use the GOT when addressing a symbol which is known
to be defined in the same linkage unit. Specifically, the symbol must have
either hidden visibility or a strong definition in the current module in
order to not use the the GOT.

This is a change from the previous behaviour where we would use the GOT to
address externally visible symbols defined in the same module. I think the
only cases where this could matter are cases involving symbol interposition,
but we don't really support that well anyway.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13650

llvm-svn: 251322

show more ...