Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init |
|
#
bb019dd1 |
| 23-Jan-2025 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[CodeGen] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC) (#124078)
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
#
44582afe |
| 19-Jun-2022 |
Haojian Wu <hokein.wu@gmail.com> |
Fix an unused-variable warning in release build, NFC.
|
#
e995e344 |
| 19-Jun-2022 |
David Green <david.green@arm.com> |
[MachinePipeliner] Handle failing constrainRegClass
The included test hits a verifier problems as one of the instructions: ``` %113:tgpreven, %114:tgprodd = MVE_VMLSLDAVas16 %12:tgpreven(tied-def 0)
[MachinePipeliner] Handle failing constrainRegClass
The included test hits a verifier problems as one of the instructions: ``` %113:tgpreven, %114:tgprodd = MVE_VMLSLDAVas16 %12:tgpreven(tied-def 0), %11:tgprodd(tied-def 1), %7:mqpr, %8:mqpr, 0, $noreg, $noreg ``` Has two inputs that come from different PHIs with the same base reg, but conflicting regclasses: ``` %11:tgprodd = PHI %103:gpr, %bb.1, %16:gpr, %bb.2 %12:tgpreven = PHI %103:gpr, %bb.1, %17:gpr, %bb.2 ```
The MachinePipeliner would attempt to use %103 for both the %11 and %12 operands in the prolog, constraining the register class to the common subset of both. Unfortunately there are no registers that are both odd and even, so the second constrainRegClass fails. Fix this situation by inserting a COPY for the second if the call to constrainRegClass fails.
The register allocation can then fold that extra copy away. The register allocation of Q regs changed with this test, but the R regs were the same and no new instructions are needed in the final assembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127971
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5 |
|
#
a43d2573 |
| 25-May-2022 |
Hendrik Greving <hgreving@google.com> |
[ModuloSchedule] Fix terminator update when peeling.
Fixes a bug of us not correctly updating the terminator of the loop's preheader, if multiple terminating branch instructions are present.
This i
[ModuloSchedule] Fix terminator update when peeling.
Fixes a bug of us not correctly updating the terminator of the loop's preheader, if multiple terminating branch instructions are present.
This is tested through existing tests. The bug itself is hard or not possible to get exposed with the upstream Hexagon backend, because the machine pipeliner checks for an existing preheader, which is defined as a block with only 1 edge into the header.
The condition of this bug is a block into the loop with more than 1 edge, and not every downstream target checks for an existing preheader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126386
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
#
37b37838 |
| 16-Mar-2022 |
Shengchen Kan <shengchen.kan@intel.com> |
[NFC][CodeGen] Rename some functions in MachineInstr.h and remove duplicated comments
|
#
989f1c72 |
| 15-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-in
Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
a278250b |
| 10-Mar-2022 |
Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org> |
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https:/
Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20. Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang, and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
show more ...
|
#
7f230fee |
| 07-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@redhat.com> |
Cleanup codegen includes
after: 1061034926 before: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2 |
|
#
2c2d489b |
| 13-Jan-2021 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[CodeGen] Remove unused function isRegLiveInExitBlocks (NFC)
The last use was removed on Jan 17, 2020 in commit 42350cd893a9cf6c199b17441dc2ba526c7cca71.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
bf730e16 |
| 09-Apr-2020 |
Jay Foad <jay.foad@amd.com> |
[CodeGen] Fix a simple FIXME. NFC.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3 |
|
#
d97cf1f8 |
| 11-Dec-2019 |
Sjoerd Meijer <sjoerd.meijer@arm.com> |
[ARM][LowOverheadLoops] Remove dead loop update instructions.
After creating a low-overhead loop, the loop update instruction was still lingering around hurting performance. This removes dead loop u
[ARM][LowOverheadLoops] Remove dead loop update instructions.
After creating a low-overhead loop, the loop update instruction was still lingering around hurting performance. This removes dead loop update instructions, which in our case are mostly SUBS instructions.
To support this, some helper functions were added to MachineLoopUtils and ReachingDefAnalysis to analyse live-ins of loop exit blocks and find uses before a particular loop instruction, respectively.
This is a first version that removes a SUBS instruction when there are no other uses inside and outside the loop block, but there are some more interesting cases in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/LowOverheadLoops/mve-tail-data-types.ll which shows that there is room for improvement. For example, we can't handle this case yet:
.. dlstp.32 lr, r2 .LBB0_1: mov r3, r2 subs r2, #4 vldrh.u32 q2, [r1], #8 vmov q1, q0 vmla.u32 q0, q2, r0 letp lr, .LBB0_1 @ %bb.2: vctp.32 r3 ..
which is a lot more tricky because r2 is not only used by the subs, but also by the mov to r3, which is used outside the low-overhead loop by the vctp instruction, and that requires a bit of a different approach, and I will follow up on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71007
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
9026518e |
| 02-Oct-2019 |
James Molloy <jmolloy@google.com> |
[ModuloSchedule] Peel out prologs and epilogs, generate actual code
Summary: This extends the PeelingModuloScheduleExpander to generate prolog and epilog code, and correctly stitch uses through the
[ModuloSchedule] Peel out prologs and epilogs, generate actual code
Summary: This extends the PeelingModuloScheduleExpander to generate prolog and epilog code, and correctly stitch uses through the prolog, kernel, epilog DAG.
The key concept in this patch is to ensure that all transforms are *local*; only a function of a block and its immediate predecessor and successor. By defining the problem in this way we can inductively rewrite the entire DAG using only local knowledge that is easy to reason about.
For example, we assume that all prologs and epilogs are near-perfect clones of the steady-state kernel. This means that if a block has an instruction that is predicated out, we can redirect all users of that instruction to that equivalent instruction in our immediate predecessor. As all blocks are clones, every instruction must have an equivalent in every other block.
Similarly we can make the assumption by construction that if a value defined in a block is used outside that block, the only possible user is its immediate successors. We maintain this even for values that are used outside the loop by creating a limited form of LCSSA.
This code isn't small, but it isn't complex.
Enabled a bunch of testing from Hexagon. There are a couple of tests not enabled yet; I'm about 80% sure there isn't buggy codegen but the tests are checking for patterns that we don't produce. Those still need a bit more investigation. In the meantime we (Google) are happy with the code produced by this on our downstream SMS implementation, and believe it generates correct code.
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68205
llvm-svn: 373462
show more ...
|