History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp (Results 276 – 300 of 1013)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# e91f86f0 05-Jul-2019 Eugene Leviant <eleviant@accesssoftek.com>

Reverted r365188 due to alignment problems on i686-android

llvm-svn: 365206


# 957c40db 05-Jul-2019 Graham Hunter <graham.hunter@arm.com>

Scalable Vector IR Type with further LTO fixes

Reintroduces the scalable vector IR type from D32530, after it was reverted
a couple of times due to increasing chromium LTO build times. This latest
i

Scalable Vector IR Type with further LTO fixes

Reintroduces the scalable vector IR type from D32530, after it was reverted
a couple of times due to increasing chromium LTO build times. This latest
incarnation removes the walk over aggregate types from the verifier entirely,
in favor of rejecting scalable vectors in the isValidElementType methods in
ArrayType and StructType. This removes the 70% degradation observed with
the second repro tarball from PR42210.

Reviewers: thakis, hans, rengolin, sdesmalen

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64079

llvm-svn: 365203

show more ...


# 820cc01d 05-Jul-2019 Eugene Leviant <eleviant@accesssoftek.com>

[ThinLTO] Attempt to recommit r365040 after caching fix

It's possible that some function can load and store the same
variable using the same constant expression:

store %Derived* @foo, %Derived** bi

[ThinLTO] Attempt to recommit r365040 after caching fix

It's possible that some function can load and store the same
variable using the same constant expression:

store %Derived* @foo, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)
%42 = load %Derived*, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)

The bitcast expression was mistakenly cached while processing loads,
and never examined later when processing store. This caused @bar to
be mistakenly treated as read-only variable. See load-store-caching.ll.

llvm-svn: 365188

show more ...


# f7e52fbd 04-Jul-2019 Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>

Revert [ThinLTO] Optimize writeonly globals out

This reverts r365040 (git commit 5cacb914758c7f436b47c8362100f10cef14bbc4)

Speculatively reverting, since this appears to have broken check-lld on
Li

Revert [ThinLTO] Optimize writeonly globals out

This reverts r365040 (git commit 5cacb914758c7f436b47c8362100f10cef14bbc4)

Speculatively reverting, since this appears to have broken check-lld on
Linux. Partial analysis in https://crbug.com/981168.

llvm-svn: 365097

show more ...


# e0308279 03-Jul-2019 Francis Visoiu Mistrih <francisvm@yahoo.com>

[Bitcode] Move Bitstream to a separate library

This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/.

This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream
code for parsi

[Bitcode] Move Bitstream to a separate library

This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/.

This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream
code for parsing optimization remarks.

Since Bitcode uses Core for the IR part:

libLLVMRemarks -> Bitcode -> Core

and Core uses libLLVMRemarks to generate remarks (see
IR/RemarkStreamer.cpp):

Core -> libLLVMRemarks

we need to separate the Bitstream and Bitcode part.

For clang-doc, it seems that it doesn't need the whole bitcode layer, so
I updated the CMake to only use the bitstream part.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63899

llvm-svn: 365091

show more ...


# 5cacb914 03-Jul-2019 Eugene Leviant <eleviant@accesssoftek.com>

[ThinLTO] Optimize writeonly globals out

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63444

llvm-svn: 365040


# 5b868285 02-Jul-2019 Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com>

[ThinLTO] Address post-review suggestions for index-based WPD summary

Removes a couple of unnecessary and/or redundant checks introduced by
r364960.

llvm-svn: 364968


# a7004363 02-Jul-2019 Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com>

[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD

Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
d

[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD

Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).

Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.

The follow-on index-based WPD patch is D55153.

Depends on D53890.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815

llvm-svn: 364960

show more ...


# 3b77583e 27-Jun-2019 Johannes Doerfert <jdoerfert@anl.gov>

[Attr] Add "willreturn" function attribute

This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back a

[Attr] Add "willreturn" function attribute

This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.

This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.

Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801

llvm-svn: 364555

show more ...


# 408fc084 27-Jun-2019 Hans Wennborg <hans@hanshq.net>

Revert r363658 "[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fix"

We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.

> Recommit of

Revert r363658 "[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fix"

We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.

> Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
> - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
> the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
> overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
> - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
> different since they only report the array or
> struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
> rather than all aggregates which contain one in
> a nested member.
> - Corrected an older comment
>
> Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
>
> Reviewed By: sdesmalen
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321

llvm-svn: 364543

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3
# 43854e3c 18-Jun-2019 Graham Hunter <graham.hunter@arm.com>

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fix

Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
- Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
the verifier, so that we don't impose too mu

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fix

Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
- Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
- Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
different since they only report the array or
struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
rather than all aggregates which contain one in
a nested member.
- Corrected an older comment

Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321

llvm-svn: 363658

show more ...


# b00dbcbb 13-Jun-2019 Eugene Leviant <eleviant@accesssoftek.com>

[ThinLTO][Bitcode] Add 'entrycount' to FS_COMBINED_PROFILE. NFC

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63078

llvm-svn: 363254


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2
# 80fee257 09-Jun-2019 Nico Weber <nicolasweber@gmx.de>

Revert r361953 "[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type"

This reverts commit f4fc01f8dd3a5dfd2060d1ad0df6b90e8351ddf7.
It caused a 3-4x slowdown when doing thinlto links, PR42210.

llvm-svn: 362913


# b7141207 30-May-2019 Tim Northover <tnorthover@apple.com>

Reapply: IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters

When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack.

Reapply: IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters

When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.

If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.

The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.

Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.

llvm-svn: 362128

show more ...


# 71ee3d02 29-May-2019 Tim Northover <tnorthover@apple.com>

Revert "IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters"

The IRLinker doesn't delve into the new byval attribute when mapping types, and
this breaks LTO.

llvm-svn: 362029


# 6e07f16f 29-May-2019 Tim Northover <tnorthover@apple.com>

IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters

When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds

IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters

When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.

If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.

Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.

llvm-svn: 362012

show more ...


# f4fc01f8 29-May-2019 Graham Hunter <graham.hunter@arm.com>

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type

* Adds a 'scalable' flag to VectorType
* Adds an 'ElementCount' class to VectorType to pass (possibly scalable) vector lengths, with overloaded operators.
* Modifie

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type

* Adds a 'scalable' flag to VectorType
* Adds an 'ElementCount' class to VectorType to pass (possibly scalable) vector lengths, with overloaded operators.
* Modifies existing helper functions to use ElementCount
* Adds support for serializing/deserializing to/from both textual and bitcode IR formats
* Extends the verifier to reject global variables of scalable types
* Updates documentation

See the latest version of the RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124396.html

Reviewers: rengolin, lattner, echristo, chandlerc, hfinkel, rkruppe, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, greened, sebpop

Reviewed By: hfinkel, sebpop

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32530

llvm-svn: 361953

show more ...


# 31fda09b 29-May-2019 Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>

Add IR support, ELF section and user documentation for partitioning feature.

The partitioning feature was proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130583.html

This is m

Add IR support, ELF section and user documentation for partitioning feature.

The partitioning feature was proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130583.html

This is mostly just documentation. The feature itself will be contributed
in subsequent patches.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60242

llvm-svn: 361923

show more ...


# 5a4f7cf2 22-May-2019 Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com>

[IR] allow fast-math-flags on select of FP values

This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086

We have been hackin

[IR] allow fast-math-flags on select of FP values

This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086

We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.

Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.

For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917

llvm-svn: 361401

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1
# 37b80122 10-May-2019 Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com>

[ThinLTO] Auto-hide prevailing linkonce_odr only when all copies eligible

Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a templ

[ThinLTO] Auto-hide prevailing linkonce_odr only when all copies eligible

Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).

Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.

Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709

llvm-svn: 360466

show more ...


# 6ed5706a 08-Apr-2019 Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com>

Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocks

COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly langua

Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocks

COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.

COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J

For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.

@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33
!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)

The DWARF generated for this is as follows.

DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4

Patch by Eric Schweitz!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327

llvm-svn: 357934

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0
# caf1316f 12-Mar-2019 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

IR: Add immarg attribute

This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.

Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrin

IR: Add immarg attribute

This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.

Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrinsics that comments
indicate it should apply to. I scanned other target intrinsics, but I
don't see any obvious comments indicating which arguments are intended
to be only immediates.

This breaks one questionable testcase for the autoupgrade. I'm unclear
on whether the autoupgrade is supposed to really handle declarations
which were never valid. The verifier fails because the attributes now
refer to a parameter past the end of the argument list.

llvm-svn: 355981

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1
# 784929d0 08-Feb-2019 Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com>

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2
# b62e9dc4 24-Jan-2019 Julian Lettner <jlettner@apple.com>

Revert "[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls"

This reverts commit cea84ab93aeb079a358ab1c8aeba6d9140ef8b47.

llvm-svn: 352069


# cea84ab9 24-Jan-2019 Julian Lettner <jlettner@apple.com>

[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls

Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before

[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls

Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.

Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute

Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```

The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.

rdar://problem/40723397

Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624

llvm-svn: 352003

show more ...


1...<<11121314151617181920>>...41