[Analysis] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#114936)

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

[Passes] Remove some legacy printer passes

MemDepPrinter doesn't have a new PM equivalent, but MemDep is soft deprecated anyway and adding one should be easy if somebody wants to.

[Analysis] Qualify auto variables in for loops (NFC)

Cleanup includes: LLVMAnalysis

Number of lines output by preprocessor:
before: 1065940348
after: 1065307662

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Diff

Cleanup includes: LLVMAnalysis

Number of lines output by preprocessor:
before: 1065940348
after: 1065307662

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120659

show more ...

Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.

More specifically,

Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.

More specifically, this commit suppresses the dependencies on
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h in two headers: llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h and
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h. As these headers (esp. the former) are widely used,
this has a decent impact on number of preprocessed lines generated during
compilation of LLVM, as showcased below.

This is achieved by moving some definitions back to the .cpp file, no
performance impact implied[0].

As a consequence of that patch, downstream user may need to manually some extra
files:

llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

In some situations, codes maybe relying on the fact that
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h was including llvm/ADT/Triple.h, this hidden
dependency now needs to be explicit.

$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
after: 10978519
before: 11245451

Related Discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
[0] https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=fa7145dfbf94cb93b1c3e610582c495cb806569b&to=995d3e326ee1d9489145e20762c65465a9caeab4&stat=instructions

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118781

show more ...

[NPM] Port module-debuginfo pass to the new pass manager

Port pass to NPM and update tests in DebugInfo/Generic.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89730

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of reco

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.

I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h

Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.

Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Remove redundant includes from lib/Analysis.

llvm-svn: 320617

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787

show more ...

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153

show more ...

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpress

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982

show more ...

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920

show more ...

Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."

This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently

[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.

This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902

show more ...

Re-commit "Use StringRef in Support/Darf APIs (NFC)"

This reverts commit r283285 and re-commit r283275 with
a fix for format("%s", Str); where Str is a StringRef.

llvm-svn: 283298

Revert "Re-commit "Use StringRef in Support/Darf APIs (NFC)""

One test seems randomly broken: DebugInfo/X86/gnu-public-names.ll

llvm-svn: 283285

Re-commit "Use StringRef in Support/Darf APIs (NFC)"

This reverts commit r283278 and re-commit r283275 with
the update to fix the build on the LLDB side.

llvm-svn: 283281

Revert "Use StringRef in Support/Darf APIs (NFC)"

This reverts commit r283275, it broke LLDB Android debug server.

llvm-svn: 283278

Use StringRef in Support/Darf APIs (NFC)

llvm-svn: 283275

Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)

Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390

Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC

The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-c

Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC

The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137

show more ...

IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata

Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the

IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata

Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.

Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.

Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).

Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.

llvm-svn: 236120

show more ...

DebugInfo: Drop rest of DIDescriptor subclasses

Delete the remaining subclasses of (the already deleted) `DIDescriptor`.
Part of PR23080.

llvm-svn: 235404

DebugInfo: Gut DIType and subclasses

Continuing PR23080, gut `DIType` and its various subclasses, leaving
behind thin wrappers around the pointer types in the new debug info
hierarchy.

llvm-svn: 23

DebugInfo: Gut DIType and subclasses

Continuing PR23080, gut `DIType` and its various subclasses, leaving
behind thin wrappers around the pointer types in the new debug info
hierarchy.

llvm-svn: 235064

show more ...