[lldb][test] Modernize asserts (#82503)

This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsne

[lldb][test] Modernize asserts (#82503)

This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).

For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.

show more ...

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problem

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460

show more ...

Reland "[lldb] Use just-built libcxx for tests when available"

This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
re

Reland "[lldb] Use just-built libcxx for tests when available"

This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
requests by tests that had `USE_LIBCPP=1` defined in their makefiles.
Now, we also use a non-default libcxx if all conditions below are true:

1. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of libstdcpp
(USE_LIBSTDCPP=1).
2. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of the system's
library (USE_SYSTEM_STDLIB=1).
3. A path to libcxx was either provided by the user through CMake flags
or libcxx was built together with LLDB.

Condition (2) is new and introduced in this patch in order to support
tests that are either:

* Cross-platform (such as API/macosx/macCatalyst and
API/tools/lldb-server). The just-built libcxx is usually not built for
platforms other than the host's.
* Cross-language (such as API/lang/objc/exceptions). In this case, the
Objective C runtime throws an exceptions that always goes through the
system's libcxx, instead of the just built libcxx. Fixing this would
require either changing the install-name of the just built libcxx in Mac
systems, or tuning the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH variable at runtime.

Some other tests exposes limitations of LLDB when running with a debug
standard library. TestDbgInfoContentForwardLists had an assertion
removed, as it was checking for buggy LLDB behavior (which now
crashes). TestFixIts had a variable renamed, as the old name clashes
with a standard library name when debug info is present. This is a known
issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34391.

For `TestSBModule`, the way the "main" module is found was changed to
look for the "a.out" module, instead of relying on the index being 0. In
some systems, the index 0 is dyld when a custom standard library is
used.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132940

show more ...

Revert "[lldb] Use just-built libcxx for tests when available"

This reverts commit c38eeecbc7d929c9601f2189214a7a90d3982a47.

[lldb] Use just-built libcxx for tests when available

This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
requests by

[lldb] Use just-built libcxx for tests when available

This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
requests by tests that had `USE_LIBCPP=1` defined in their makefiles.
Now, we also use a non-default libcxx if all conditions below are true:

1. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of libstdcpp
(USE_LIBSTDCPP=1).
2. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of the system's
library (USE_SYSTEM_STDLIB=1).
3. A path to libcxx was either provided by the user through CMake flags
or libcxx was built together with LLDB.

Condition (2) is new and introduced in this patch in order to support
tests that are either:

* Cross-platform (such as API/macosx/macCatalyst and
API/tools/lldb-server). The just-built libcxx is usually not built for
platforms other than the host's.
* Cross-language (such as API/lang/objc/exceptions). In this case, the
Objective C runtime throws an exceptions that always goes through the
system's libcxx, instead of the just built libcxx. Fixing this would
require either changing the install-name of the just built libcxx in Mac
systems, or tuning the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH variable at runtime.

Some other tests exposes limitations of LLDB when running with a debug
standard library. TestDbgInfoContentForwardLists had an assertion
removed, as it was checking for buggy LLDB behavior (which now
crashes). TestFixIts had a variable renamed, as the old name clashes
with a standard library name when debug info is present. This is a known
issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34391.

For `TestSBModule`, the way the "main" module is found was changed to
look for the "a.out" module, instead of relying on the index being 0. In
some systems, the index 0 is dyld when a custom standard library is
used.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132940

show more ...

[lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)

Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://r

[lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)

Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077

show more ...

[lldb] Skip a bunch of tests that shouldn't run remotely

Skip a bunch of tests that don't really make sense to run remotely.

[lldb] Replace asserts on .Success() with assertSuccess()

Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).

* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message

[lldb] Replace asserts on .Success() with assertSuccess()

Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).

* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616

show more ...

[lldb/test] Skip TestSBModule unless darwin

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>

Revert "[lldb/test] Try to fix TestSBModule failure"

This reverts commit 326516448c839d8f9cc515b20a34d0f3a6ee2374.

[lldb/test] Try to fix TestSBModule failure

This should fix https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/68/builds/25571

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>

[lldb/API] Add ability to check if module is backed by a file on disk

This patch introduces a new SBAPI method: `SBModule::IsFileBacked`

As the name suggests, it tells the user if the module's obje

[lldb/API] Add ability to check if module is backed by a file on disk

This patch introduces a new SBAPI method: `SBModule::IsFileBacked`

As the name suggests, it tells the user if the module's object file is
on disk or in memory.

rdar://68538278

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118261

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>

show more ...