[lldb][test] Modernize assertEqual(value, bool) (#82526)

Any time we see the pattern `assertEqual(value, bool)`, we can replace
that with `assert<bool>(value)`. Likewise for `assertNotEqual`.

Te

[lldb][test] Modernize assertEqual(value, bool) (#82526)

Any time we see the pattern `assertEqual(value, bool)`, we can replace
that with `assert<bool>(value)`. Likewise for `assertNotEqual`.

Technically this relaxes the test a bit, as we may want to make sure
`value` is either `True` or `False`, and not something that implicitly
converts to a bool. For example, `assertEqual("foo", True)` will fail,
but `assertTrue("foo")` will not. In most cases, this distinction is not
important.

There are two such places that this patch does **not** transform, since
it seems intentional that we want the result to be a bool:
*
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5daf2001a1e4d71ce1273a1e7e31cf6e6ac37c10/lldb/test/API/python_api/sbstructureddata/TestStructuredDataAPI.py#L90
*
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5daf2001a1e4d71ce1273a1e7e31cf6e6ac37c10/lldb/test/API/commands/settings/TestSettings.py#L940

Followup to 9c2468821ec51defd09c246fea4a47886fff8c01. I patched `teyit`
with a `visit_assertEqual` node handler to generate this.

show more ...

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problem

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460

show more ...

[lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)

Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://r

[lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)

Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077

show more ...

[lldb, test] Fix typos in the lldb tests

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126596

[lldb] Fix that the expression commands --top-level flag overwrites --allow-jit false

The `--allow-jit` flag allows the user to force the IR interpreter to run the
provided expression.

The `--top-l

[lldb] Fix that the expression commands --top-level flag overwrites --allow-jit false

The `--allow-jit` flag allows the user to force the IR interpreter to run the
provided expression.

The `--top-level` flag parses and injects the code as if its in the top level
scope of a source file.

Both flags just change the ExecutionPolicy of the expression:
* `--allow-jit true` -> doesn't change anything (its the default)
* `--allow-jit false` -> ExecutionPolicyNever
* `--top-level` -> ExecutionPolicyTopLevel

Passing `--allow-jit false` and `--top-level` currently causes the `--top-level`
to silently overwrite the ExecutionPolicy value that was set by `--allow-jit
false`. There isn't any ExecutionPolicy value that says "top-level but only
interpret", so I would say we reject this combination of flags until someone
finds time to refactor top-level feature out of the ExecutionPolicy enum.

The SBExpressionOptions suffer from a similar symptom as `SetTopLevel` and
`SetAllowJIT` just silently disable each other. But those functions don't have
any error handling, so not a lot we can do about this in the meantime.

Reviewed By: labath, kastiglione

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91780

show more ...

[lldb] Use assertIn/NotIn over assertTrue/False (NFC)

For improved failure messages, use `assertIn` over `assertTrue`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96095

[lldb/Test] Introduce "assertSuccess"

Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message

[lldb/Test] Introduce "assertSuccess"

Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message (False is not True) and the most important piece of
information -- the actual error message -- is completely hidden.

Sometimes we mitigate that by including the error message in the "msg"
argument, but this has two additional problems:
- as the msg argument is evaluated unconditionally, one needs to be
careful to not trigger an exception when the operation was actually
successful.
- it requires more typing, which means we often don't do it

assertSuccess solves these problems by taking the entire SBError object
as an argument. If the operation was unsuccessful, it can format a
reasonable error message itself. The function still accepts a "msg"
argument, which can include any additional context, but this context now
does not need to include the error message.

To demonstrate usage, I replace a number of existing assertTrue
assertions with the new function. As this process is not easily
automatable, I have just manually updated a representative sample. In
some cases, I did not update the code to use assertSuccess, but I went
for even higher-level assertion apis (runCmd, expect_expr), as these are
even shorter, and can produce even better failure messages.

Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82759

show more ...

[lldb][test] Remove symlink for API tests.

Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.

This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:

```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdi

[lldb][test] Remove symlink for API tests.

Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.

This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:

```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```

lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151

show more ...