History log of /llvm-project/lldb/test/API/commands/command/container/welcome.py (Results 1 – 4 of 4)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5
# 2238dcc3 25-May-2023 Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problem

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3
# 193259cb 12-Aug-2022 David Spickett <david.spickett@linaro.org>

[LLDB] Remove __future__ imports from tests

Not needed now that we require python 3.

Reviewed By: kastiglione, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131761


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2
# 39ea676d 02-Jan-2022 Dave Lee <davelee.com@gmail.com>

[lldb] Compute fully qualified command names in FindCommandsForApropos

Fixes incomplete command names in `apropos` results.

The full command names given by `apropos` have come from command name str

[lldb] Compute fully qualified command names in FindCommandsForApropos

Fixes incomplete command names in `apropos` results.

The full command names given by `apropos` have come from command name string
literals given to `CommandObject` constructors. For most commands, this has
been accurate, but some commands have incorrect strings. This results in
`apropos` output that doesn't tell the user the full command name they might
want learn more about. These strings can be fixed.

There's a seperate issue that can't be fixed as easily: plugin commands. With
the way they're implemented, plugin commands have to exclude the root command
from their command name string. To illustrate, the `language objc` subcommand
has to set its command name string to "objc", which results in apropos printing
results as `objc ...` instead of `language objc ...`.

To fix both of these issues, this commit changes `FindCommandsForApropos` to
derive the fully qualified command name using the keys of subcommand maps.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116491

(cherry picked from commit b3bfd595a548cd85b12e4e83729436cb73b26f29)

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# c5011aed 12-Oct-2021 Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>

Add a "command container" hierarchy to allow users to add container nodes.

The point is to allow users with a related set of script based commands
to organize their commands in a hierarchy in the co

Add a "command container" hierarchy to allow users to add container nodes.

The point is to allow users with a related set of script based commands
to organize their commands in a hierarchy in the command set, rather than
having to have only top-level commands.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110298

show more ...