[libc++] Uglify non-standard member typedef const_reference in bitset (#121620)

According to
[[template.bitset.general]](https://eel.is/c++draft/template.bitset.general),
`std::bitset` is supposed

[libc++] Uglify non-standard member typedef const_reference in bitset (#121620)

According to
[[template.bitset.general]](https://eel.is/c++draft/template.bitset.general),
`std::bitset` is supposed to have only
one (public) member typedef, `reference`. However, libc++'s
implementation of `std::bitset` offers more that that. Specifically, it
offers a public typedef `const_reference` and two private typedefs
`size_type` and `difference_type`. These non-standard member typedefs,
despite being private, can cause potential ambiguities in name lookup in
user-defined classes, as demonstrated in issue #121618.

Fixing the public member typedef `const_reference` is straightforward:
we can simply replace it with an `__ugly_name` such as
`__const_reference`. However, fixing the private member typedefs
`size_type` and `difference_type` is not so straightforward as they are
required by the `__bit_iterator` class and the corresponding algorithms
optimized for `__bit_iterator`s (e.g., `ranges::fill`).

This PR fixes the member typedef `const_reference` by using uglified
name for it. Further work will be undertaken to address `size_type` and
`difference_type`.

Follows up #80706, #111127, and #112843,

show more ...

[libc++] Implement P2417R2 (A more constexpr bitset)

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: jloser, arichardson, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131218

[libc++] `bitset::operator[] const` should return bool

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/10686

Reviewed By: Mordante, ldionne, var-const, #libc

Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arpha

[libc++] `bitset::operator[] const` should return bool

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/10686

Reviewed By: Mordante, ldionne, var-const, #libc

Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122092

show more ...

[libc++] Remove additional uses of std::rand() missed by 63aeadb4849d

[libc++] Refactor tests to remove uses of std::rand()

This allows running these tests on systems that do not support std::rand().

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Suppress MSVC's /analyze warning C6294 in a more fine-grained manner.

Fixes D32926.

llvm-svn: 302325

[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warnings C4127 and C6326 about constants.

MSVC has compiler warnings C4127 "conditional expression is constant" (enabled
by /W4) and C6326 "Potential comparison of a constan

[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warnings C4127 and C6326 about constants.

MSVC has compiler warnings C4127 "conditional expression is constant" (enabled
by /W4) and C6326 "Potential comparison of a constant with another constant"
(enabled by /analyze). They're potentially useful, although they're slightly
annoying to library devs who know what they're doing. In the latest version of
the compiler, C4127 is suppressed when the compiler sees simple tests like
"if (name_of_thing)", so extracting comparison expressions into named
constants is a workaround. At the same time, using std::integral_constant
avoids C6326, which doesn't look at template arguments.

test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/emplace.pass.cpp
Replace 1 == 1 with true, which is the same as far as the library is concerned.

Fixes D28837.

llvm-svn: 292432

show more ...

Guard Clang and GCC specific pragmas. Patch from STL@microsoft.com

llvm-svn: 267836

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658