|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7 |
|
| #
f98a3dd7 |
| 22-May-2024 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[NFC][libc++][test] Removes C++98 support. (#92930)
Libc++ has no separate C++98 support, it uses C++03 instead. This
removes some obsolete c++98 markers in the test.
Thanks to @StephanTLavavej
[NFC][libc++][test] Removes C++98 support. (#92930)
Libc++ has no separate C++98 support, it uses C++03 instead. This
removes some obsolete c++98 markers in the test.
Thanks to @StephanTLavavej for spotting this.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1 |
|
| #
c2df7076 |
| 08-Sep-2022 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Suppress -Wctad-maybe-unsupported on types w/o deduction guides
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides
[libc++] Suppress -Wctad-maybe-unsupported on types w/o deduction guides
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d828 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
show more ...
|