[libcxx] Fix the type attribute for a couple templates

Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.

This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.

[libcxx] Fix the type attribute for a couple templates

Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.

This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.search.default test cases when built in MSVC/DLL configurations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99932

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Add XFAIL LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME in 124 tests that fail in the future CI configuration

This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configurat

[libcxx] [test] Add XFAIL LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME in 124 tests that fail in the future CI configuration

This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.

A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095

show more ...

[libc++] [P1065] Constexpr invoke, reference_wrapper, mem_fn, not_fn, default_searcher.

This completes the implementation of P1065 "constexpr INVOKE":
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/pap

[libc++] [P1065] Constexpr invoke, reference_wrapper, mem_fn, not_fn, default_searcher.

This completes the implementation of P1065 "constexpr INVOKE":
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1065r2.html

This doesn't yet complete the implementation of P1032 "Misc constexpr bits,"
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1032r1.html
but it does complete all of the <functional> bits, which means
that we can now set `__cpp_lib_constexpr_functional` for C++20.

This could use more constexpr tests for `std::reference_wrapper<T>`,
but the existing tests are extremely non-constexpr-friendly and
so I don't want to get into that rabbit-hole today.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93815

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...

Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 362252

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

Add the C++17 extensions to std::search. Include the default searcher, but not the Boyer-Moore or Boyer-Moore-Horspool searcher (yet). BUT put the BM and BMH tests in place, marked to XFAIL. The othe

Add the C++17 extensions to std::search. Include the default searcher, but not the Boyer-Moore or Boyer-Moore-Horspool searcher (yet). BUT put the BM and BMH tests in place, marked to XFAIL. The other searchers will follow soon

llvm-svn: 322019

show more ...