[libc++] Implement std::boyer_moore{, _horspool}_searcher

This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: n

[libc++] Implement std::boyer_moore{, _horspool}_searcher

This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074

show more ...

Revert "[libc++][libc++abi] Add tests for vendor-specific properties"

This reverts commit 9892d1644f62cf8f5133ee0d2ebafb56f6500cc1, which
causes clang test failures in libcxx tests.

[libc++][libc++abi] Add tests for vendor-specific properties

Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
lo

[libc++][libc++abi] Add tests for vendor-specific properties

Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.

In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.

The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.

But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736

show more ...

[libc++] Clarify the name of Lit features related to standard library selection

Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that u

[libc++] Clarify the name of Lit features related to standard library selection

Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).

Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...

[libc++][test] Properly mark libc++-only XFAILs

These tests PASS on libstdc++ and MSVC.

Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 362252

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

Add the C++17 extensions to std::search. Include the default searcher, but not the Boyer-Moore or Boyer-Moore-Horspool searcher (yet). BUT put the BM and BMH tests in place, marked to XFAIL. The othe

Add the C++17 extensions to std::search. Include the default searcher, but not the Boyer-Moore or Boyer-Moore-Horspool searcher (yet). BUT put the BM and BMH tests in place, marked to XFAIL. The other searchers will follow soon

llvm-svn: 322019

show more ...